The Role of In-Service Teacher in Supervising Pre-Service Teachers during Teaching Practicum Program

Diah Latifah(1),


(1) Jl Dr. Setiabudhi no 229 Bandung, Indonesia

Abstract

This study analyzes the role of in-service teacher in supervising the pre-service teachers during the Teaching Practicum Program and in building the pre-service teachers’ character to be competent music teachers in the future. This study implements narrative inquiry as the method of research. Narrative inquiry method explains the variety of cases during the process of supervision by the in-service teacher. In addition, the research was held in Pasundan 8 Senior High School Bandung and was analyzed further by using qualitative methods with interactive analysis as it is formulated in the research question of this study. Results show that the supervision by an in-service teacher has been successfully enhanced the ability of pre-service teachers in teaching art and culture, particularly music lesson. The competence of pre-service teachers can be achieved by giving them examples, model, and music experience from in-service of the pre-service teachers.

Keywords

in-service teachers’ supervision; the competence of pre-service teachers in teaching music lesson

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arnett, S. E. & Freeburg, B. W. (2008). Family and Consumer Sciences Pre- Service Teachers: Impact of an Early Field Experience. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 26(1), 48-56.

Cohen-Sayag, E. (2012). Reflective Writing in Pre-Service Teachers’Teaching: What does it Promote?. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(10), 20-36.

Danumihardja. (2001). Paradigma Baru Pendidikan. Jakarta: Paramadina.

Deal, D. & White C. S. (2006). Voices from the classroom: Literacy Beliefs and practices of two novice Elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 20(4), 313-329.

Haith, M. P., & Whittingham, K. A. (1012). The impact of being part of an action learning set for new lecturers: a reflective analysis. Action Learning Research and Practice, 9(2), 111-123.

Hamalik, O. (2005). Evaluasi Kurikulum.Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 129-169.

Kerka, S. (2002). Journal writing as an adult learning tool. Practice Application Brief no. 22 Retrieved from: http://www.cete.org/acve/docgen.asp?tbl=pab&ID=112

Knoblauch, D. & Hoy, W. (2008) “May be I can teach those Kids” The influence on context factors on student teachers’ efficacy beliefs. Teaching and teacher Education, 24(2), 166-179.

Leonarda, H. S. & Marquard, M. J. (2010). The evidence for the effectiveness of action learning. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 7(2), 121-136.

Marshall, W., & Regenia C. J. (2007).An Investigation on the Impact of a Guided Reflection. Technique in Service-Learning Courses to Prepare Special Educators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 30(4), 276–285.

Mulyasa, E. H. (2011). Manajemen & kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Parwoto. (1998). Pedoman Pelaksanaan Program Pengalaman Lapangan (PPL) Program Studi PGLB. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti Depdikbud.

Psacharopoulos, G. (1985). Returns to Education. A Further International Update And Implications. Journal of Human resources, 20(4), 583-604.

Puspita, S., Dewi, W. A., & Sumaryati, S. (2013). Kendala-Kendala Pelaksanaan Program Pengalaman Lapangan (PPL) Mahasiswa FKIP UNS Di SMK Negeri 1 Sukoharjo Tahun 2012. Jupe, 2(1), 26-38.

Rahmat, K., Cristiana, D. M., & Lukman, F. (2013). The Implementation of Sundanese Leadership Values in Education Management: A Study on “DasaPasanta” in School Principal Leadership Based on Sundanese Cultural Values of Leadership. International Journal of Education, 5(4), 110-121.

Russel, A. (2012). The Failures files: Perspective on Failure. Action Learning Research and Practice, 9(2), 201-203.

Sami’an & Analya, P. (2014). Hubungan antara Peran Guru Pamong dan Minat Mahasiswa Menjadi Guru dengan Prestasi Program Pengalaman Lapangan: Studi Kasus Pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Akuntansi FKIP-UMS. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 24(1), 47-53.

Schulz, R. (2005). The practicum: More than practice. Canadian Journal of Education, 28(1/2), 147-169.

Shalaway, L. (2005). Learning to Teach. USA: Corbis.

Slockdale, S. L. & William, R. L. (2004). Cooperative learning groups at the college level: Differential effects on high, average and low exam performers. Journal of Behavioural Education, 13(1), 37-50.

Soewito, N. (2013). Materi Pembekalan PPL. Yogyakarta: Pusat Pengembangan Praktik Pengalaman Lapangan dan Praktik Kerja Lapangan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Suryalaga, H. (2009). Kasundaan Rawayan Jati. Bandung: Yayasan Nur Hidayah.

Tim Pengembang Kurikulum. (2013). Dokumen Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Desember 2012.

Tuli, F. & File, G. (2010). Practicum Experience in Teacher Education. Ethiopian Journal of Education and Sciences, 5(1), 108-116.

Widarto, P. & Noto Widodo. (2012). Pengembangan Model Pembelajar-an Soft Skills untuk Siswa Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 31(3), 1-20.

Widiastuti, N. W. & Suhandana, I. G. A. (2013). Studi Evaluasi Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Praktik Pengalaman Lapangan (PPL) Mahasiswa Fakultas Pendidikan Olahraga dan Kesehatan (FPOK) IKIP PGRI Bali Tahun 2012. Jurnal Penelitian, 4(1), 1-12.

Zaher, A. (2010). Effects of Cooperative Learning vs. Traditional instruction on Prospective Teachers’ Learning Experience and Achievement. Journal of Faculty of Educational Science, 43(1), 151-164.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.