Effectiveness of Social Science Learning Based on Noble Values of Ki Hajar Dewantara’s Teaching to Strengthen the Students’ Character

Warsito Warsito(1), Asrowi Asrowi(2),




(1) Widya Dharma University, Klaten, Central Java, Indonesia
(2) Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia

Abstract

The objectives of this research are: 1) to describe the reasons why social science learning based on the noble values of Ki Hajar Dewantara’s teaching is effective to strengthen the students’ character; 2) to describe the effectiveness of social science learning based on the noble values of Ki Hajar Dewantara’s teaching in to strengthen the students’ character; 3) to compare the effectiveness of the enhancement of the students’ character of social science learning through the noble values of Ki Hajar Dewantara’s teaching and conventional social science learning. This research used the mixed methods. The population was the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools in Solo Raya and its vicinity which encompasses Surakarta City, Boyolali Regency, Sukoharjo, Karanganyar, Wonogiri, Sragen, and Klaten. The data were collected through (1) test, (2) questionnaire, (3) in-depth interview, (4) observation, and (5) documentation. The data were analyzed by using the difference test. The results of research are as follows: 1) the reasons why social science learning process based on the noble values of Ki Hajar Dewantara’s teaching is effective to strengthen the students’ character 2) Social science learning based on the noble values of Ki Hajar Dewantara’s teaching is more effective in strengthen the students’ understanding of character education, and it is more effective than the conventional learning as indicated by the results of the difference test. 

Keywords

social science learning, Ki Hajar Dewantara, students’ character

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arends, R.I. (2001). Learning to Teach. Fifth Edition. Boston Burr Ridge: Published by McGraw-Hill.

As’aril Muhajir. (2011). Ilmu Pendidikan Perspektif Kontekstual. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Berkowitz, Marvin W. and Melinda C. Bier. 2007. What Works in Character Education, Journal of Research in Character Education, 5 (1), 2007, pp. 29-48.

Beichner, Dawn and Spohn, Cassia. (2012) Modeling the Effects of Victim Behavior and Moral Character on Prosecutors’ Charging Decisions in Sexual Assault Cases. Violence and Victims Journals. 27.1 (2012): 3-24.

Borba, M. (2001). Building Moral Intelligence. (Membangun Kecerdasan Moral). Alih bahasa: Lina Jusuf. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Budiyono. (2013). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Press.

Cheng, Chao-Shun. (2007). Character Education and Character-trait Development Enrichment for College Students. Chinese Association of Gifted Education, Paper Presented at the 2007 seminar of Kao Yuan University for General Education May 25, 2007 at Kao Yuan University Kaohsiung Country, ROC, E-mail: [email protected]

Eko Putro Widoyoko (2011). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Panduan Praktis bagi Pendidik dan Calon Pendidik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Ferzacca, S. (2002).A Javanese Metropolis and Mental Life. Ethos. 301/2. Source: http://search.proquest.com/docview. Diunduh: Senin, 18 Maret 2013 pukul 15.05 WIB.

Goleman, Daniel. (2001). Emotional Intellegence (Kecerdasan Emosional). Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Gredler, M. E. (2011). Learning and Instruction-Teori dan Aplikasi. Dialihbahasakan oleh Tri Wibowo B.S. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Haris Mudjiman. (2006). Belajar Mandiri (Self-Motivated Learning). Surakarta: LPP dan UPT Penerbitan dan Pencetakan UNS UNS Press.

Joyce B., Weil M., Calhoun E. (2011). Models of Teaching. Boston : Pearson Prentice Hall.

Ki Hajar Dewantara. (1962). Karja Ki Hadjar Dewantara. Jogjakarta: Madjelis Luhur Persatuan Taman Siswa.

Ki Hajar Dewantara. (1962). Kumpulan Tulisan-tulisan Ki Hadjar Dewantara. Jogjakarta: Madjelis Luhur Persatuan Taman Siswa.

Ki Soeratman. (1980). Tutwuri Handayani. Yogyakarta: Majelis Luhur Tamansiswa.

Ki Supriyoko (2013). Budi Pekerti Masuk Perdais, 27 Februari 2013. Kedaulatan Rakyat, p.2

__________. (2013). Konsep Pendidikan Karakter Bangsa: Pendidikan Karakter Terpadu dalam Membangun Generasi Muda di Era Global. Makalah Disampaikan dalam Forum Seminar Nasional Memperingati Hari Pahlawan dan Hari Guru di Semarang, 30 November 2013.

Mattar, N., & Khalil, R. (2010) “Character education seeking the best of both worlds: a study of cultural identity and leadership in Egypt.” Article. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social sciences. Volume 5, No. 11, pp. 23-52. Diunduh 7 Oktober 2013.

Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis, A Sourcebook of New Methods. Beverly Hills London New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Mohamad Termizi Borhan & Zurida Ismail. (2011). Pre-Service Teachers’ Perception Toward Environmental Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours. Malaysian Journal of Learning & Instruction mjli.Vol. 8 (2011): 117-137.

Ratna Megawangi. (2004). Pendidikan Karakter: Solusi yang Tepat untuk Membangun Bangsa. Bogor: Indonesia Heritage Foundations.

Siswandari. (2011). Statistika Computer Based. Surakarta: LPP dan UPT Penerbitan dan Percetakan UNS (UNS Press).

Slavin, R.E. (2000) Educational Psychology: Theory into Practice. Prentice Hall: Engelwood (liff).

Smith, M. K. (2004). The Behaviourist Orientation of Learning. (http//www.infed. org.biblio/learning.behaviourist.htm. Juli 1996.

Sri Untari, Suparlan AH., Ketut DA., dan Nur Wahyu R. (2008). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar dan Lembar Kegiatan Siswa Mata Pelajaran PKn dengan Pendekatan Deep Dialoque/Critical Thinking untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berdialog dan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Penelitian Kependidikan, Tahun 18, Nomor 1, Oktober 2008, Hal. 154-177.

Sugiyono. (2000). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Penerbit CV Alfabeta.

_______. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.

Suyanto. (2010). Urgensi Pendidikan Karakter.http://www.mendikdasmen.depdiknas.go.id/web/pages/urgensi.html, diunduh 17-1-2014.

Virtue, D. C. &Vogler, K. E.(2008).The Pedagogical Value of Folk Literature as a Cultural Resource for Social Studies Instruction: An Analysis of Folktales from Denmark. Journal of Social Studies Research. 32.1 (Spring 2008): 28-39.

Walpole, R.E. (1982). Introduction to Statistics. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.

Wittrock, M.C. (1990). Generating Processes of Comprehension. Educational Psychologist.24 (4).531-541.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.