Gender Differences in The Adoption of Mobile Banking: Review of Using TAM on Banking Customers

Agung Sugiarto(1),


(1) Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata

Abstract

Mobile banking as a manifestation of the use of technology in the banking sector, has a very massive deployment level. This study focuses on the use of mobile banking technology as one of the products of information technology in the banking field. Gender differences of mobile banking users empirically shown to be affected by several factors that can be identified through modeling framework technology acceptance model (TAM), including: perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use.

Keywords

TAM; perceived usefulness; perceived ease of use

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R. and Todd, P.A. 1992. “Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication”. MIS Quarterly. June, pp. 227-47.

Ajzen, I. 1975. “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (50:2), pp. 179-211.

Berninghausen and Kerstan, 1992. Forging New Path. Feminist Social.

Methodological and Rural Women in Java.

Bierstaker, James L, Burnaby, Priscilla dan Thibodeau. 2001. The Impact of Information Technology on The Audit Process: an Assessment of The State of The Art and Implications for The Future. Managerial Auditing Journal. Vol.16, No.3 : 159 – 164.

Davis, F. D. 1986. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly (13:3), pp. 319- 339.

Elaine, Showalter. 1989. Feminist criticism: essays on women, literature and theory. New York: Pantheon Book.

Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

Gefen, D., and Straub, D.W. 1997. “Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model,” MIS Quarterly (21:4), pp. 389-400.

Ghozali, I. 2004. Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Undip.

Griffith TL. 1999. Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Acad ManagRev; 24(3):472–88.

Harrison dan Datta, 2007. Akuntansi. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Jogiyanto, 2007. Sistem Informasi Keperilakuan, Andi Offset Yogyakarta

Kim, Hyo-Jeong, Michael Mannino, Robert J. Nieschwietz. 2009. Information technology acceptance in the internal audit profession:

Impact of technology features and complexity. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 10 (2009) 214–228

Rezaee, Zabihollah. 2001. Continuous Auditing :The Audit of The Future.Managerial Auditing Journal Vol.16 No. 3 : 150 –158

Sugiyono, 2009. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.

Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., and Howell, J. M. 1991. “Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization,” MIS Quarterly (15:1), pp. 125-143.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G.2000. Why Don’t Men Ever Stop to Ask For Directions? Gender, Social Influence and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior. Management Information System Quarterly Vol. 24 No. 1, Maret 2000.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License