The Effect of PjBL with WBL Media and Cognitive Style on Students’ Understanding and Science-Integrated Concept Application

S. Safaruddin, I. N. S. Degeng, P. Setyosari, N. Murtadho

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out the effect of PjBL with WBL media as an instructional strategy and direct instructional (DI) strategy on the understanding (intercept) and the concept application of science-integrated learning media. The method of this research is Quasi-Experimental with 2x2 factorial design. The number of respondents is 110 pre-service teachers consisting of 68 respondents for the experimental class and 42 respondents for the control class. The sampling technique is purposive sampling with a class as an experimental class and another class as a control class. MANOVA is used to analyze the data. The result of the test shows that: (1) there is a difference in the average score of learning outcomes in understanding and science-integrated conceptual application among pre-service teachers who are taught with Web-based PjBL and DI strategies. The average score of understanding the concept of developing science-integrated learning media with a Web-based PjBL strategy is 88.81, DI is 85.69. The average score of the concept application with Web-based PjBL strategy is 89.07, DI is 85.69; (2) there are differences in the average score of understanding learning outcomes and the application of the concept of developing science-integrated learning media between pre-service teachers who have a cognitive style of FD and FI. The average score of understanding the concept of FD is 88.08, FI is 86.12. The average score of the concept application FD is 87.37, FI is 88.29. From these data, it can be concluded that the Web-based PjBL strategy has a better contribution than DI in improving the learning outcomes of understanding and application of the concept of developing science-integrated learning media.

Keywords

PjBL; website learning; cognitive style; conceptual understanding; science-integrated

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abidin, Y. (2014). Desain sistem pembelajaran dalam konteks kurikulum 2013. Refika Aditama.

Aldabbus, S. (2018). Project-based learning: Implementation & challenges. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development, 6(3), 71-79.

Aldarmono, A. (2012). Identifikasi gaya kognitif (cognitive style) peserta didik dalam belajar. AlMabsut: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Sosial, 3(1), 63-69.

Amini, R. (2017). The Development of Integrated Learning Based Students’ book to Improve Elementary School Students’competence. Unnes Science Education Journal, 6(2), 1586–1592.

Andheska, H., Suparno, S., Dawud, D., & Suyitno, Ä°. (2020). Writing Motivation and The Ability in Writing a Research Proposal of Generation Z Students Based on Cognitive Style. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 87-104.

Asuman, B., Khan, M. S. H., & Clement, C. K. (2018). Integration of Web-Based Learning into Higher Education Institutions in Uganda: Teachers’ Perspectives. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 13(3), 33-50.

Atsuwe, B. A., & Thaddeus, T. (2019). Effect of Cognitive Style on Students Achievement and Retention in Physics in Senior Secondary School in Gwer-West Local Government Area, Benue State, Nigeria. International Journal, 7(2), 73-78.

Baron, J. (2020). Religion, cognitive style, and rational thinking. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 64-68.

Baya’a, N. F., Daher, W. M., & Anabousy, A. A. (2019). The Development of In-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Integration of ICT in a Community of Practice: Teaching-in-Context Theory. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 14(01), 125.

Binns, I. C., Casto, A. R., Polly, D., & Bickmore, S. T. (2020). Examining Pre-Service Teachers’ Integration of Science and Literacy through Trade Books. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 24(2), 7-21.

Buchori, A., Setyosari, P., Dasna, I. W., Ulfa, S., Degeng, I. N. S., & Sa’dijah, C. (2017). Effectiveness of Direct Instruction Learning Strategy Assisted by Mobile Augmented Reality And Achievement Motivation on Students Cognitive Learning Results. Asian Social Science, 13(9), 137-144.

Bugawa, A. M., & Mirzal, A. (2018). The impact of Web 2.0 technologies on the learning experience of students in higher education: A review. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 13(3), 1-17.

Chiu, C. F. (2020). Facilitating K-12 Teachers in Creating Apps by Visual Programming and Project-based Learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(01), 103-118.

Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research design pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Degeng, I. N. S. (2013). Ilmu pembelajaran: Klasifikasi variabel untuk pengembangan teori dan penelitian. Bandung: Kalam Hidup.

Deswila, N., Kustati, M., Besral, B., & Sukandi, S. S. (2020). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Approach across Curriculum in Science Classrooms: Are the English Language Use and Learning Reveal?. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 1(1), 15-21.

Efstratia, D. (2014). Experiential education through project based learning. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 152, 1256-1260.

Fazio, X., & Gallagher, T. L. (2019). Science and language integration in elementary classrooms: Instructional enactments and student learning outcomes. Research in Science Education, 49(4), 959-976.

Fletcher, T., Ní Chróinín, D., & O’Sullivan, M. (2016). A Layered Approach to Critical Friendship as a Means to Support Pedagogical Innovation in Pre-Service Teacher Education. Studying teacher education, 12(3), 302-319.

Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and Learning with Technology: Effectiveness of ICT Integration in Schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175-191.

Hakim, A., Setyosari, P., Degeng, N. S., & Kuswandi, D. (2018). Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran (Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Vs Pembelajaran Langsung) dan Motivasi Belajar. JINOTEP (Jurnal Inovasi dan Teknologi Pembelajaran): Kajian dan Riset Dalam Teknologi Pembelajaran, 3(1), 1-13.

Han, H. (2019). Design and Implementation of WebBased English Autonomous Learning System. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(06), 18-26.

Han, S., & Bhattacharya, K. (2001). Constructionisme, Learning by Design, and Project Based Learning. University of Georgia

Hsieh, S., Yu, Y. T., Chen, E. H., Yang, C. T., & Wang, C. H. (2020). ERP correlates of a flanker task with varying levels of analytic-holistic cognitive style. Personality and Individual Differences, 153, 109673.

Ilmi, A. M., & Sunarno, W. (2020, January). Development of TPACK based-physics learning media to improve HOTS and scientific attitude. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1440, No. 1, p. 012049). IOP Publishing.

Ismuwardani, Z., Nuryatin, A., & Doyin, M. (2019). Implementation of Project Based Learning Model to Increased Creativity and Self-Reliance of Students on Poetry Writing Skills. Journal of Primary Education, 8(1), 51-58.

Kızkapan, O., & Bektaş, O. (2017). The Effect of Project Based Learning on Seventh Grade Students’ Academic Achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 10(1), 37–54.

Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277.

Margunayasa, I. G., Dantes, N., Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., & Suastra, I. W. (2019). The Effect of Guided Inquiry Learning and Cognitive Style on Science Learning Achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 737-750.

Martínez-Bernal, J., Sanabria Rodríguez, L. B., & López-Vargas, O. (2016). Relationships between learning achievement, self-monitoring, cognitive style, and learning style in medical students. Praxis & Saber, 7(14), 141-164.

Marwazi, M., Masrukan, M., & Putra, N. M. D. (2019). Analysis of Problem Solving Ability Based on Field Dependent Cognitive Style in Discovery Learning Models. Journal of Primary Education, 8(2), 127-134.

Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (Eds.). (2006). The new taxonomy of educational objectives. Corwin Press.

Maulana, I. T., Hary, R., Purwasih, R., Firdian, F., Sundara, T. A., & Na’am, J. (2019). Projectbased learning model practicality on local network devices installation subject. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(15), 94-106.

Mkrttchian, V., Krevskiy, I., Bershadsky, A., Glotova, T., Gamidullaeva, L., & Vasin, S. (2019). Web-Based Learning and Development of University’s Electronic Informational Educational Environment. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 14(1), 32-53.

Moore, S., May, D., & Wold, K. (2016). Developing cultural competency in engineering through transnational distance learning. In Engineering Education 4.0 (pp. 777-798). Springer, Cham.

Nie, Y., Xiao, Y., Fritchman, J. C., Liu, Q., Han, J., Xiong, J., & Bao, L. (2019). Teaching towards knowledge integration in learning force and motion. International Journal of Science Education, 41(16), 2271-2295.

Nuankaew, P., Nuankaew, W., Phanniphong, K., Imwut, S., & Bussaman, S. (2019). Students model in different learning styles of academic achievement at the university of Phayao, Thailand. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(12), 133-157.

Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2016). Comparing tablets and PCs in teaching mathematics: An attempt to improve mathematics competence in early childhood education. Preschool and Primary Education, 4(2), 241-253.

Payung, M. S. B., Nuriah, T., & Sarkadi, S. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Dan Gaya Kognitif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Sejarah Siswa di SMA 28 Kab. Tangerang. Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, 6(1).

Pramusinta, Y., Setyosari, P., Widiati, U., & Kuswandi, D. (2019). Exploring metacognitive and critical thinking skills of pre-service elementary school teachers through discovery learning method by integrating various cognitive styles. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 999-1017.

Putranta, H., & Supahar, S. (2019). Development of physics-tier tests (PysTT) to measure students’ conceptual understanding and creative thinking skills: a qualitative synthesis. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 747-775.

Ramadhani, R., Umam, R., Abdurrahman, A., & Syazali, M. (2019). The effect of flipped-problem based learning model integrated with LMSgoogle classroom for senior high school students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 137-158.

Reinhardt, A., Korner, T., & Walter, M. (2019, June). Community building as basis for fostering Teaching & Learning innovation-18 years of project funding. In EdMedia+ Innovate Learning (pp. 1048-1053). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Rich, K. M., Yadav, A., & Schwarz, C. V. (2019). Computational thinking, mathematics, and science: Elementary teachers’ perspectives on integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 27(2), 165-205.

Rusman, R. (2017). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada.

Salim, A., Setyosari, P., Kamdi, W., & Dasna, I. W. (2019). Improving Competency Management of Public Health Center In Indonesia Using The Problem Based Learning Model. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 731-746.

Sari, H. V., & Suswanto, H. (2017). Pengembangan media pembelajaran Berbasis Web Untuk mengukur hasil Belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran Komputer Jaringan Dasar program Keahlian teknik komputer dan jaringan. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 2(7), 1008-1016.

Sarmi, R. S. (2019, April). Learning media analysis in the development of integrated science teacher book with theme the energy in the life using type integrated of 21st century learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1185, No. 1, p. 012080). IOP Publishing.

Sa’dijah, C., & Sudirman, S. (2016). Proses Berpikir Siswa SMP Bergaya Kognitif Field Dependent dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Berdasarkan Teori Pemrosesan Informasi. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(2), 237-245.

Schuster, K., Thöing, K., May, D., Lensing, K., Grosch, M., Richert, A., ... & Jeschke, S. (2016). Status quo of media usage and mobile learning in engineering education. In Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2015/2016 (pp. 429-441). Springer, Cham.

Scott, I. (2011). The learning outcome in higher education: time to think again?. Worcester Journal of Learning and Teaching, (5).

Sellah, L., Jacinta, K., & Helen, M. (2017). Analysis of Student-Teacher Cognitive Styles Interaction: An Approach to Understanding Learner Performance. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(14), 10-20.

Setyosari, P. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan & Pengembangan†edisi Keempat. Penerbit Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta.

Shaughnessy, J. J., Zechmeister, E. B., & Zechmeister, J. S. (2012). Research Methods in Psychology (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Shubina, I., & Kulakli, A. (2019). Pervasive learning and technology usage for creativity development in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(01), 95-109.

Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., & Russell, J. D. (2014). Instructional technology & media for learning: Teknologi pembelajaran dan media untuk belajar. Prenada Media.

Sumarni, W., & Kadarwati, S. (2020). Ethno-Stem Project-Based Learning: Its Impact to Critical and Creative Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 11-21.

Supermane, S., & Tahir, L. M. (2017). Knowledge management in enhancing the teaching and learning innovation. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(6), 721-727.

Taseman, T., Purwani, W. A., Safaruddin, S., Erfansyah, N. F., Pangastuti, R., Dachlan, A. M., & Khozain, N. (2020). Meeting Standards Through Integrated Curriculum: Point of View by Sussan M. Drake and Rebecca C. Bruns. International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 1(1), 58-62.

Ulya, H. (2015). Hubungan gaya kognitif dengan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa. Jurnal konseling GUSJIGANG, 1(2).

Weitzel, H., & Blank, R. (2020). Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Peer Dialogues between Pre-Service Biology Teachers in the Planning of Science Lessons. Results of an Intervention Study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(1), 75-93.

Wisetsat, C., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2019). Enhancin innovative thinking of Thai pre-service teachers through multi-educational innovations. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 409-419.

Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). Group Embedded Figures Test . Menlo Park. CA.: Mind Garden.

Wong, J., Baars, M., de Koning, B. B., van der Zee, T., Davis, D., Khalil, M., ... & Paas, F. (2019). Educational theories and learning analytics: From data to knowledge. In Utilizing learning analytics to support study success (pp. 3-25). Springer, Cham.

Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Educational Psychology. Allyn and Bacon.

Yudiernawati, A., Setyosari, P., Degeng, I. N. S., & Rudianto, A. (2015). Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran dan Gaya Kognitif terhadap Prestasi Belajar Aplikasi Proses Keperawatan pada Pembelajaran Klinik Keperawatan. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora (JPH), 3(1), 31-40.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i3.24628

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share