Evaluation of Institutional Development : Case on Private Forest Farmer Group in Sumbawa Regency

Dian - Diniyati(1),


(1) Institute for Research and Development on Agroforestry Technology

Abstract

Although a large number of studies have been conducted to evaluate the success of farmer groups, a comprehensive evaluations starting from group formation process has not been carried out much.  This research rates the success of farmer groups as a vehicle to improve the livelihoods of farmers in the area of Management Unit of Production Forest (KPHP) of Puncak Ngengas-Batu Lanteh, Sumbawa. The success was measured by evaluating three roles of farmer groups namely,  a) class for learning, b) forum for collaboration, and c) unit for production. This research was conducted in two periods, i.e. on April 2016 and April 2017. The sample consisted of 20 forest farmers selected purposively, the data were collected through interviews and focus group discussion techniques and analysed descriptively. This study revealed that the roles scale of farmer groups as class for learning and as a forum for collaboration were categorized as low level, while as a unit for production was categorized as moderate level. These categories show that in general the farmer group had not succeeded in carrying out its function as a class for learning, and as a vehicle for collaboration, except as a unit for production. This weak condition was utilized by middlemen to take advantages from marketing activity by controlling forest product prices.  The Kanada farmer group was categorized in the beginner group which needs 75 % intervention from outsider such as continual mentoring by counsellors to grow the attitude from working alone to working together in a group. 

Keywords

class for learning, farmer group, production unit, roles of group, working together.

Full Text:

Fulltext PDF

References

Abdul-rahaman, A., & Abdulai, A. (2018). Do farmer groups impact on farm yield and efficiency of smallholder farmers ? Evidence from rice farmers in northern Ghana. Food Policy Journal, (October).

Abebe, G. K., Bijman, J., & Royer, A. (2016). Are middlemen facilitators or barriers to improve smallholders â€TM welfare in rural economies ? Empirical evidence from Ethiopia. Journal of Rural Studies, 43, 203–213. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.004

Banaszak, I. (n.d.). Determinants of Successful Cooperation in Agricultural Markets : Evidence from Producer Groups in Poland, 27–46.

Cahyono, S., & Tjokropandoyo, D. S. (2013). Peran Kelembagaan Petani Dalam Mendukung Keberlanjutan Pertanian Sebagai Basis Pengembangan Ekonomi Lokal. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah Dan Kota, 2(1), 15–23.

Diniyati, D. (2015). Ragam Pekerjaan Petani Penggarap di RPH Kanar Luk Wilayah KPHP Batulanteh, Kabupaten Sumbawa. In inovasi agroforestry mendukung kemandirian bangsa (pp. 720–725).

Fa, J., Chlebicka, A., & Beata, Å. (2017). Social relationships and governing collaborative actions in rural areas : Some evidence from agricultural producer groups in Poland. Journal of Rural Studies Journal, 49(1305), 104–116.

Ginting, I. M., & Fauzia, L. (2012). Studi Perbandingan Natara Kelompok Tani kelas Pemula dengan kelompok tani kelas Madya di Kabupaten Aceh Tamiang. Program Study Agribisnis, USU.

Hermanto, H., & Swastika, D. K. S. (2011). Penguatan Kelompok Tani: Langkah Awal Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Petani. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 9(4), 371–390.

Hidayatullah, M., Handoko, C., Maring, A. J., & Ramdiawan, R. (2017). Kondisi Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat Pemburu Madu Hutan di Dusun Arung Santek, Pulau Moyo. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional dalam rangka Dies Natalis Ke 42 UNS.

Koampa, M. V., Benu, O. L. S., Sendow, M. M., & Moniaga, V. R. B. (2015). Partisipasi Kelompok Tani Dalam Kegiatan Penyuluhan Pertanian Di Desa Kanonang Lima, Kecamatan Kawangkoan Barat. ASE, 11(3A), 19–32.

Nuryanti, S., & Swastika, D. K. S. (2011). Peran Kelompok Tani Dalam Penerapan Teknologi Pertanian. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomii, 29(2), 111–128.

Puspitasari, A. W. (2015). Farmer ’ s Prosperity : How to Increase Farmer ’ s Bargain Power ( In Islamic Perspective ). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211(September), 455–460. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.060

Ranjan, R. (2017). Challenges to Farm Produce Marketing : A Model of Bargaining between Farmers and Middlemen under Risk. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 42(3), 386–405.

Ruhimat, I. S. (2015). Tingkat motivasi petani dalam penerapan sistem agroforestry. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 12(2), 131–147.

Rustandi, Y., & Suhadji, R. (2017). Keragaan Evaluasi Fungsi Kelembagaan Kelompok Tani Di Kecamatan Papar Kabupaten Kediri Jawa Timur. Agrica Ekstensia, 2(2), 55–60.

Suryahadi, A. (2007). Modul 4 : Persyaratan dan Unsur-unsur Evaluasi yang baik. In Kumpulan Bahan Latihan Pemantauan Evaluasi Program-program Penangulangan Kemiskinan. Jakarta: Bappenas.

Tolno, E., Kobayashi, H., Ichizen, M., Esham, M., & Balde, B. S. (2015). Economic Analysis of the Role of Farmer Organizations in Enhancing Smallholder Potato Farmers ’ Income in Middle Guinea. Journal of Agricultural Science, 7(3), 123–137. http://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v7n3p123

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.