Comparison Between SAW and TOPSIS Methods in Selection of Broiler Chicken Meat Quality

Pungky Tri Kisworo Adi(1), Endang Sugiharti(2), Alamsyah Alamsyah(3),


(1) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(2) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(3) Universitas Negeri Semarang

Abstract

Decision support system is a system that can assist semi-structured and unstructured decision making, in which no one knows exactly how decisions should be made. Broiler Chicken farm production is growing very rapidly along with the increasing market demand for Broiler Chicken. Broiler Chickens have fast growth in a relatively short time. The purpose of this research is the selection of chicken meat quality by applying comparison of SAW and TOPSIS method. The variables used are age, ration conversion, weight of chicken weight, and water consumption. The system is created using PHP framework Code Ignitier and database MySQL using waterfall method. That is analyze the user needs on the system, do the database design, by doing a coding and testing the system whether it is what is expected. The result of this research is the application of comparison between SAW and TOPSIS method each consist of 5 criteria. Comparison of these algorithms can facilitate the breeders in choosing a good quality broiler chicken meat.The results of the best farmer recommendation according to comparative method of SAW and TOPSIS. In SAW method of breeder 1 The biggest value is at V2 = 0,341, so alternative A2 is alternatives chosen as good alternative. Breeder 2 The biggest value is at V3 = 0.033, so alternative A3 is the alternative chosen as a good enough alternative. Breeder 3 The biggest value is at V1 = 0.005, so alternative A1 is the alternative chosen as an excellent alternative. Topsis Method of Breeders 1 is the largest value  at V2 = 9.98, so alternative A2 is the alternative chosen as a good alternative. Breeder 2 is the biggest value at V3 = 0.372, so alternative A3 is the alternative chosen as a good enough alternative. Breeder 3 is the biggest value at V3 = 0.982, so alternative A3 is the alternative chosen as a good enough alternative. This system uses only 5 criteria, it would be nice if you add other criteria that support the selection of broiler chicken meat quality.

Keywords

Decision support system, broiler chicken, Simple Additive Weight, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Muslim, M.A. (2012). Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Jurusan Berbasis Web Untuk Meningkatkan Pelayanan Dan Akses Informasi. Jurnal MIPA, 35(1): 92-98

Angkat, L. S. (2015). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Induk Ayam Produktif Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weight (SAW) (Studi Kasus : PT. Expravet Nasuba Farm Desa Namopuli), 9(2), 135–141.

Josaputri, C. A., Sugiharti, E., & Arifudin, R. (2016). Decision Support Systems for The Determination of Cattle with Superior Seeds using AHP and SAW Method. Scientific Journal of Informatics, 3(2): 23-28.

Mude, M. A. (2016). Perbandingan Metode SAW dan TOPSIS pada Kasus UMKM. Jurnal Ilmiah ILKOM, 8(2), 76–81.

Laksana, T. G., & Zarkasy, M. E. (2015). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Supplier Pemilihan Bibit Ayam Broiler Menggunakan Metode Ahp. Jurnal Online ICT STMIK IKMI, 13(1).

Alamsyah, & Arus, A.A. (2014). Analisis Sistem Pendaftaran pada Web Forum Ilmiah Matematika Unnes 2014. Scientific Journal of Informatics, 1(1):107-118.

Adeyemo, G. O. (2013). Growth Performance of Broiler Chickens Fed Fossil Shell Growth Promoter. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 4, 16–19.

Helilintar, R., Winarno, W. W., & Al Fatta, H. (2016). Penerapan Metode SAW dan Fuzzy dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Beasiswa. Citec Journal, 3(2), 89–101.

Shin, Y., Lee, S., Chun, S., & Chung, D. (2013). A Critical Review of Popular Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methodologies. Issues in Information Systems, 14(1), 358–365.

Febriyati, M. N., Sophan, M. K., & Yunitarini, R. (2016). Recruitment Warga Laboratorium Teknik Informatika Di Universitas, 5(3), 133–142.

Idris, S. L. (2012). Analisis Perbandingan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Simple Additive Weighting (SAW).

Hamid, R. A., & Eldin, Z. (2012). A Decision Support System for Performance Evaluation. IJCA Special Issue on “Computational Intelligence & Information Security†CIIS, 1–8.

Mu’asyaroh, F. L., & Mahmudy, W. F. (2016). Implementasi Algoritma Genetika dalam Optimasi Model AHP dan TOPSIS untuk Penentuan Kelayakan Pengisian Bibit Ayam Broiler di Kandang Peternak. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer (JTIIK), 3(4), 208–219.

Pressman, Roger S. (2001). Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 5th Edition. Singapore: McGraw-Hill,Inc.

Nugroho, Z.A., & R. Arifudin. Sistem Informasi Tracer Study Alumni Universitas Negeri Semarang Dengan Aplikasi Digital Maps. Scientific Journal of Informatics, 1(2): 154.

Purwinarko, A. (2014). Model Expertise Management System di Universitas Negeri Semarang. Scientific Journal of Informatics, 1(2): 178.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Scientific Journal of Informatics (SJI)
p-ISSN 2407-7658 | e-ISSN 2460-0040
Published By Department of Computer Science Universitas Negeri Semarang
Website: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/sji
Email: [email protected]

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.