A Comparative Study of Blasphemy Law in Indonesia and America: Religious and Legal Aspects
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Blasphemy laws serve as contentious intersections of religious belief and legal governance, reflecting the complex relationship between state authority and individual freedoms. This comparative study explores the dynamics of blasphemy laws in two diverse contexts: Indonesia and the United States. Indonesia, as the world's most populous Muslim-majority nation, exemplifies a predominantly Islamic legal framework, while the United States, renowned for its constitutional protections of free speech, offers a contrasting perspective rooted in secular principles. Drawing upon religious, cultural, and legal dimensions, this research scrutinizes the origins, evolution, and enforcement of blasphemy laws in both countries. It examines the socio-political contexts that shape interpretations of blasphemy, exploring the role of religion in public discourse and legal jurisprudence. Furthermore, it delves into case studies and landmark legal rulings to discern the practical implications of blasphemy laws on religious minorities, freedom of expression, and societal cohesion. By juxtaposing these two distinct legal landscapes, this study aims to illuminate the complexities inherent in navigating religious sensitivities within legal frameworks, as well as the broader implications for human rights and democratic governance. Through an interdisciplinary approach, it seeks to foster a nuanced understanding of the multifaceted interactions between religion, law, and society, thereby contributing to scholarly discourse and policy dialogue on issues of religious freedom and legal pluralism in an increasingly interconnected world.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Ahyar, Muzayyin and Alfitri. “Aksi Bela Islam: Islamic Clicktivism and the New Authority of Religious Propaganda in the Millennial Age Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies 9, No. 1 (2019): 1–29.
Al-Qardhawi, Yusuf. n.d. Islam dan Sekularisme Diterjemahkan Dari Buku: Al-Islam Wal Ilma’niyah Wajhan Lil Wajhin. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Anon. n.d. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Edisi Keli. Balai Pustaka.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. “Kedudukan dan Peranan Hukum Tata Negara dalam Pembangunan.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 25, No. 2 (1995): 135.
Asy’ari, Hasyim. “Relasi Negara dan Agama Di Indonesia.” Materials Science and Engineering 37, No. 1 (2014): 60–67.
Budiyono, Budiyono. “Hubungan Negara Dan Agama Dalam Negara Pancasila.” Fiat Justicia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, No. 3 (2014).
Commager, Henry Steele. “Penghujatan Abner Kneeland.” Triwulanan New England 8, No. 1 (1935).
Crouch, Melissa A. “Law and Religion in Indonesia: The Constitutional Court and the Blasphemy Law.” Asian Journal of Comparative Law 7, No. 1 (2012): 1–53.
Dictionary, Merriam-Webster. co. n.d. “Blasphemy.”
Dictionary, Merriam-Webster. co. n.d. “Secularism.”
Hamzah, Andi. Hukum Acara Pidana. (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014).
Haris, Munawir. “Warisan Paradigmatik Kebijakan Politik Kerukunan Antaragama Kolonial Pada Masa Reformasi.” Tasamuh: Jurnal Studi Islam 9, No. 1 (2017): 157–208.
Huda, M. Syamsul. "The local construction of religious blasphemy in East Java." JIIS-Journal of Indonesian Islam 13, No. 1 (2019): 69-114.
Husaini, Adian. Wajah Peradaban Barat, Dari Hegemoni Kristen Ke Dominasi Sekular-Liberal. (Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 2005).
Hutabarat, Binsar Antoni. “Evaluasi Terhadap Peraturan Bersama Menteri Tahun 2006 Tentang Pendirian Rumah Ibadah.” Societas Dei: Jurnal Agama Dan Masyarakat 4, No. 1 (2017): 8.
Ishak, Nurfaika. "Religious Tolerance in the Constitution and Guarantees for the Protection of Human Rights." Jurnal Scientia Indonesia 8, No. 1 (2022): 53-70.
Makin, Al. “Not A Religious State; A Study of Three Indonesian Religious Leaders on The Relation of State And Religion.” Journal Indonesia and the Malay Word 45 (2017): 1–22.
Marshall, Paul. “The Ambiguities of Religious Freedom in Indonesia.” Review of Faith and International Affairs 16, No. 1 (2018): 85–96.
Moeljatno, Moeljatno. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2002).
Moko, Catur. “Pluralisme Agama Menurut Nurcholis Madjid (1939-2005) Dalam Konteks Keindonesiaan.” Medina-Te : Jurnal Studi Islam 13, No. 1 (2017).
Muktiono, Muktiono. “Mengkaji Politik Hukum Kebebasan Beragama Dan Berkeyakinan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 12, No. 2 (2012).
Nirenberg, Sarah. “The Resurgence of Secularism: Hostility Towards Religion in The United States and France.” Washington University Jurisprudence Review 5, No. 1 (2012).
Prasetyani, Rurin Sisilia, and Shally Saniyya Novina. "The Interpretation of Freedom of Religion and Believe: How Do University Understand This to Society?." The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education 2, No. 1 (2020): 15-28.
Prasetyo, Kresna Adi, and Ridwan Arifin. "Analisis Hukum Pidana Mengenai Tindak Pidana Penistaan Agama di Indonesia." Gorontalo Law Review 2, No. 1 (2019): 1-12.
Pultoni, Siti Aminah, and Uli Parulian Sihombing. Panduan Pemantauan Tindak Pidana Penodaan Agama Dan Ujaran Kebencian. Jakarta: The Indonesian Legal Resource Center, 2012).
Remmelink, Jan. Hukum Pidana Komentar Atas Pasal Terpenting Dari KUHP Belanda Dan Padanannya Dalam KUHP Indonesia. (Jakarta: Gramedia, 2003).
Rohman, Fathur and Ahmad Ali Munir. “Membangun Kerukunan Umat Beragama Dengan Nilai-Nilai Pluralisme Gus Dur.” An-Nuha 5, No. 2 (2018).
Saifuddin, Lukman H. “Indonesia Adalah Negara Agamis: Merumuskan Relasi Agama dan Negara dalam Perspektif Pancasila. . In Kongres Pancasila held by Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM) Yogyakarta and Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, 2019.
Sari, Desika Arum. "The Doctrine of Belief as a Vulnerable Group: How do the Human Rights Laws Accommodate this Group?." Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang 5, No. 2 (2019).
Thompson, Derek. “Three Decades Ago, America Lost Its Religion, Why?”, 2019.
Tsakyrakis, Stavros. “Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights?” International Journal of Constitutional Law 7, No. 3 (2019): 468–493.
U. S. Commission on Civil Rights. 1979. “Religious Discrimination. A Neglected Issue. A Consultation Sponsored by the United States Commission on Civil Rights.” Washington D.C., 1979.
Winkle, Andrew B. Van. “Separation Of Religion And State In Japan: A Pragmatic Interpretation of Articles 20 And 89 of The Japanese Constitution.” Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal Association 21, No. 2 (2012).
Zainuddin, Muhammad. Pluralisme Agama: Pergulatan Dialogis Islam-Kristen di Indonesia. (Malang: UIN Maliki Press, 2010).