THE IDEATIONAL MEANING REALISED IN THE WRITTEN DISCOURSE IN ONLINE NEWSPAPER ON ABDUL QODIR JAELANI (AQJ)
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
This thesis is aimed at reporting the analysis on the ideational meaning realised in the written discourse in online newspaper on Abdul Qodir Jaelani (AQJ). Under a discourse analysis method, the data were collected through retrieving twenty texts on the discourse of AQJ from some online newspapers. The texts on the discourse of AQJ are analysed using the framework of systemic functional linguistics which is realised based on the ideational meaning as suggested by Halliday & Matthiessen (2004). The findings reveal that there are 1043 participant types (2%) involve throughout the texts. Meanwhile, there are 712 process types (3%) involve, and there are 274 circumstance types (7%) involve throughout the texts. Hence, the existence of participants is more dominant than processes and circumstances available throughout twenty texts. Based on the findings, it is recommended that the English teacher can apply discourse analysis as the approach to analyse the texts in teaching the English learners about how to analyse the clauses of the texts to enhance their ability in analysing the text both journalistic texts (hard and soft news) and classroom texts (text types).
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
Brown, H. D. 2007. The principles of language learning and teaching, fifth edition. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Butt, D, Fahey, R, Feez, S, Spinks, S, and Yollap, C. 2000. Using functional grammar, an explorer’s guide. Macquarie University-Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
Christie, F and Derewianka, B. 2008. School discourse. London: Continuum.
Derewianka, B. 1990. Exploring how texts work. Sydney: Primary English teaching association.
Emilia, E. 2005. A critical genre-based approach to teaching academic writing in a tertiary efl context in indonesia. Ph.D., Dissertation. Australia: University of Melbourne.
Eggins, S. 1994. An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Pinter Publisher Ltd.
Eggins, S. 2004. An introduction to systemic functional linguistics, 2nd edition. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Freddi, M. 2004. Functional grammar: an introduction for the EFL students. Bologna: Functional Grammar Studies for Non-Native Speakers of English.
Fraenkel, J.R., and Wallen, N.E, and Hyun, H.H. 2012. How to design and evaluate research in education, 8th edition. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.
Garot, L and Wignell, P. 1994. Making sense of functional grammar. Sydney: Antipodean Educational Enterprises.
Griffin, G. 2007. The uses of discourse analysis in the study of gender and migration. University of York. Retrieved September 12th 2013 from http://www.fondazionegraziottin.org/ew/ew_articolo/1122%20-%20similarities%20and%20differencies.pdf.
Halliday, M.A.K., and Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edition. Great Britain: Arnold.
Kazemia, B, Behnam, B, and Ghafoori, N. 2013. Ideational grammatical metaphor in scientific texts: a hallidayan perspective. International Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2013, pp. 146-168. Retrieved on September 25th 2013, from http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijl/article/download/4192/pdf_24
Mulatsih, S. 2007. The realization of ideational meanings in students’ recounts. Celt Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2, December 2007, pp.143-157. Retrieved on September 25th 2013 from http://www.journalcelt.com/2012/01/realization-of-ideational-meanings-in.html
Setiawan, A, Setiabudi, D.H, and Simon, Y. 2011. Linguistic application using transitivity-appraisal analysis. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), Vol.1, No.2, pp. 171-181. Retrieved on October 10th 2013 from http://www.iaesjournal.com/online/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/11/pdf-I-2-10.
Sujatna, E.T.S. 2012. Applying systemic functional linguistics to bahasa Indonesia Clauses. International Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 134-146. Retrieved on October 10th 2013 from http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijl/article/viewFile/1506/pdf.
Tabrizi, F and Nabifar, N. 2013. A comparative study of ideational grammatical metaphor in health and political texts of English newspapers. Journal of Academic and Applied Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1, January 2013, pp. 32-51. Retrieved on September 25th 2013 from http://www.academians.org/Articles/Jan2013-3.pdf
Trappes-Lomax, H. 2008. Discourse analysis. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. Retrieved on October 10th 2013 from http://www.wyxy.snnu.edu.cn/ yy/uploadfiles/201006/20100606095647740.pdf.
Wattless, I and Radic-Bojanic, B. 2007. The analysis of an online debate: the systemic functional grammar approach. Journal of Linguistics and Literature, Vol. 05, No. 01, pp. 47. Retrieved on September 25th 2013 from http://facta.junis.ni.ac.yu/lal/lal2007/lal2007-05.pdf