“THE BOARD GAME TO DEVELOP STUENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL FOR HIGH AND LOW ACHIEVERS” The Case at The Eleventh Graders of Ihsaniyah Senior High School of Tegal In The Academic Year of 2013-2014

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Maila Huda Shofyana

Abstract

This study was investigated the effectiveness of the board game for High and Low Students’ achievement in speaking. The objects of this study were conducted at the eleventh graders; the samples of the research were from two classes, each class consisting of 26 students for experimental group and 26 students for control group. Each class was divided into two groups based on their level of achievement (high and low). This research applied a quantitative method with a factorial design. The data were analyzed by using ANOVA and Tuckey test. The result of the study showed that: (1) there is no significant difference between using board game and drilling to the high achievers ;(2) There is a significant difference between using board game and drilling to the low achievers;(3) There is a significant difference of using board game to the high and low achievers; (4) There is a significant difference of using drilling to the high and low achievers; (5) There is a significant interaction of teaching technique (board game and drilling) and types of students of achievement (high and low).

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Shofyana, M. H. (1). “THE BOARD GAME TO DEVELOP STUENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL FOR HIGH AND LOW ACHIEVERS” The Case at The Eleventh Graders of Ihsaniyah Senior High School of Tegal In The Academic Year of 2013-2014. English Education Journal, 4(1). Retrieved from http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/6649

References

Arikunto, S. 2007. Prosedur Penelitian; Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (6th Revised Ed.). Jakarta: P.T. Rineka Cipta.
Brown, H. Douglas. 2001. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. San Francisco State University: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Cohen, Louis et.al. 2007. Research Methods in Education. 6thed. New York: Routledge.
Gay, L.R. 1992. Educational Research. Competencies for Analysis and Application New York: Macmilan Publishing Company.
Harmer, Jeremy. 2001. The Practice of English Language Teaching. 3rd Edition. Essex: Pearson Education Ltd.
J.1998.How to Teach English. Harlow: Longman
Hornby A. S 1990. Oxford Advance Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. London: Oxford University Pres.
Johnson, Burke and Christensen, Larry. 2000. Educational Research. Quantitative and Qualitative Approach. USA: A Pearson Education Company.
K, Friederike. 1984. Keep Talking,communicative fluency activities for language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Nunan, David. 1991. Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richard, Jack C, and Rodgers Thedore S. 2001. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching, Second Edition. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta
Tuckman, B. W. 1978. Conducting Educational Research.N.Y. Harcout Brace Jovanouich.