MISTAKES WITHIN THE DESCRIPTIVE TEXTS PRODUCED BY UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Adip Arifin
Retmono -
Warsono -

Abstract

Learning a target language is actually a process of trial and error, whether as the first, the second or even foreign language. This study is aimed to find out the mistakes within the descriptive texts. The method used in this study was a qualitative approach, and the design was discourse analysis. The data were taken from the 27 descriptive texts written by the fourth semester students of English Department, while the technique of analysis was based on the error analysis theory, involved: collection of a sample, identification, description and explanation. The generic structure result showed that the students could write well in the identification and aspect part, but not in conclusion part. In case of lexicogrammatical features, the use of verbs caused the most number of mistakes, or 132 mistakes (30.07%), while the fewest ones was the use of adjective, found only 4 times (0.91%) of the total mistakes. Generally, the students used the lexicogrammatical features in their writing, even though still need to be improved. The causes of students’ mistakes were mostly due to the interlingual aspect.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Arifin, A., -, R., & -, W. (1). MISTAKES WITHIN THE DESCRIPTIVE TEXTS PRODUCED BY UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS. English Education Journal, 4(2). Retrieved from http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/6664

References

Anderson, M. & Anderson, K.(2003). Text Types in English 1-2. South Yarra: Macmillan Education Australia.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principle: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (2nd.ed.). San Fransisco: Longman.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (4th ed.) New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Corder, S. P. (1973). Introducing Applied Linguistics. Hormondsworth: Penguin
Ellis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (1997). Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2011). Educational Research 10th ed.: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Hariri, M. (2012). Taxonomy of morpho-syntactic errors and error analysis. Reserch Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol 4 (22), pp. 4856-4850. Retrieved from http://www.rjas.org on October 12th, 2013.
Huang, J. (2003). Error analysis in English teaching: A review of studies. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. Vol. 2, pp. 19-34. Retrieved from http://www.ijsrp.org on October 12th, 2013.
Hyland, K. (2007). Genre and Second Language Writing. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
James, C. (1998). Errors in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis. New York: Longman
Johnson, M. (2004). A Philosophy of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Mary Jane Peluso.
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London: Longman.
Nemser, W. (1971). Approximative Systems of Foreign Language Learners. In Richards. Error Analysis; Perspective on Second Language Acquisition. London: Longman.
Newmark, P. (1988). A Textbook of Translation. London: Prentice Hall.
Richards, J. C. (1974). Error Analysis: Perspectives on second Language Acquisition. London: Longman
Valette, R. M. (1997). Modern Language Testing. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Widdowson, H. G. (2007). Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wishon, J. & Burks, P. (1980). Let’s Write English. New York: American Book.