Discourse on Legal Expression in Arrangements of Corruption Eradication in Indonesia

Article Sidebar

Full Text (English)
Published Nov 1, 2020
DOI https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v5i2.40670

Main Article Content

Shubhan Noor Hidayat
Universitas Sebelas Maret
Lego Karjoko
Department of Administrative Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5377-876X
Sapto Hermawan
Department of Administrative Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1527-594X

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to explain and examine the expansion of the absolute competence of the Administrative Court (hereinafter referred to as PTUN) after the Government Administration Law is promulgated and the implications of the application of the Administrative Law on legal certainty to eradicate and enforce corruption in Indonesia. This research uses a normative juridical research method and uses a statutory approach (statute approach). The results showed "that there are several forms of expansion of PTUN competencies, such as the authority that acts factually, the authority, administrative authorization, decide on positive fictitious decisions, and discretionary trials". Meanwhile, the implications of the Government Administration Law on corruption are known as corruption crimes, which are true. So, in this context, there are at least two problems, namely: “1. If the authorized court case is carried out by the state government which is submitted to the court simultaneously, to the State Administrative Court and to the District Court in a corruption case? 2. If at any time a PTUN decision has been issued stating that it is not authorized, but there is also a party who submits the case to the District Court on charges of corruption. What is the attitude of the District Court, whether to accept the PTUN decision on the case or choose to override the PTUN decisionâ€.  So the author is of the view that in this case there is concern that it will complicate the prosecution or eradication of criminal acts of corruption in the case of abuse of authority committed by government officials.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hidayat, S. N., Karjoko, L., & Hermawan, S. (2020). Discourse on Legal Expression in Arrangements of Corruption Eradication in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 5(2), 391-418. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v5i2.40670
Issue
Vol 5 No 2 (2020): Legal Developments in National and Global Context: Various Contemporary Issues
Section
Research Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under the licence of  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0). 

Author Biographies

Shubhan Noor Hidayat, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Shubhan Noor Hidayat is a Student of Master of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Lego Karjoko, Department of Administrative Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Lego Karjoko is a senior lecturer at the Department of Administrative Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia. His areas of expertise include State Administrative Law and Legal Studies. Some of his works have been published in various national and international journals, such as "Setting of Plantation Land Area Limitation Based on Social Function Principles of Land Cultivation Rights to Realize Social Welfare Promoting Plantation" (Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 2017), "Pengaturan Tanah Baluwarti Sebagai Kawasan Cagar Budaya yang Berbasis Budaya Hukum Jawa" (Mimbar Hukum, 2009), and "Komparasi Antara Sistem Hukum Tanah Nasional Dengan Sistem Hukum Tanah Keraton Yogyakarta" (Yustisia, 2008).

Sapto Hermawan, Department of Administrative Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Sapto Hermawan is a lecturer at the Department of Administrative Law, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia. Obtained a Bachelor's degree (UGM, 2002), a Master of Laws (UGM, 2012), and a Doctor of Law (UGM, 2018) from Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. His areas of expertise include state administrative law. In addition to being a Lecturer and Researcher, currently, he also serves as the Managing Editor of the Journal Yustisia and is an editor and reviewer of several legal journals, both national and international.

References

Atmasasmita, R. (2008). Arah Pembangunan Hukum di Indonesia, Komisi Yudisial dan Keadilan Sosial. Jakarta: Komisi Yudisial.

Buana, M. S. (2010). “Hubungan Tarik-Menarik Antara Asas Kepastian Hukum (Legal Certainty) Dengan Asas Keadilan (Substantial Justice) Dalam Putusan-Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Thesis, Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Elpah, D. (2016). Titik Singgung Kewenangan Antara Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dengan Pengadilan Tipikor dalam Menilai Terjadinya Penyalahgunaan Wewenang, Jakarta: Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan MA.

Hadjon, P. M. et.al. (1993). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UGM Press.

Hadjon, P. M. et.al. (1999) Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia (Introduction to the Indonesian Administrative Law), Cetakan Keenam. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Jaya, N. S. P. (2008). Beberapa Pemikiran ke arah Pengembangan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Marbun, S.F. (1997). Peradilan Administrasi Negara dan Upaya Administrasi di Inodnesia,.Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Permana, T. C. I. (2016). Catatan Kritis terhadap Perluasan Kewenangan Mengadili Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Yogyakarta: Genta Press.

Republic of Indonesia. (2015). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI No. 4 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pedoman Beracara Dalam Penilaian Unsur Penyalahgunaan Wewenang.

Republic of Indonesia. (2016). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 25/PUU-XIV/2016.

Ridwan, H.R. (2009a). Tiga Dimensi Hukum Administrasi dan Peradilan Administrasi, Cetakan Pertama, Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Ridwan, H.R. (2009b) Hukum Administrasi di Daerah, Cetakan Pertama, Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Ridwan, H.R. et. al. (2018). Perluasan Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 25(2), 339-358.

Saputra, R. (2020). Development of Creative Industries as Regional Leaders in National Tourism Efforts Based on Geographical Indications. Jurnal Bestuur, 8(2), 108-120.

Suhariyanto, B. (2018) Persinggungan Kewenangan Mengadili Penyalahgunaan Diskresi Antara Pengadilan TUN dan Pengadilan Tipikor, Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 7(2), 213-236 .

Susanti, I. (2014). Refleksi Ilmu Hukum dalam Analisis Penegakan Hukum Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 14(1), 123-133/

Wahab, S. A. (2011). Analisis Kebijakan: Dari Formulasi Ke Penyusunan Model Model Implementasi Kebijakan Publik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Wahyunadi, Y. M. (2016). “Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Konteks Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan”, Dissertation, Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti.

Widodo, J. (2001). Etika Birokrasi dalam Pelayanan Publik. Malang: Citra Media.

Widodo, J. (2004). Membangun Birokrasi Berbasis Kinerja. Malang: Banyumedia.

Wiyono, R. (2007). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Cetakan Peratama. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.