The Effectiveness of The Implementation of The e-Court Justice System and The Impact on Administrative Court in Indonesia

Main Article Content

Heni Rosida
Nadiyah Meyliana Putri
Ayu Putri Rainah Petung Banjaransari
Ahsana Nadiyya
Christ Sella

Abstract

Using the e-Court system in the Administrative Court aims to create a simple, fast, and low-cost judicial environment under the constitutional mandate where law enforcement and justice need to be carried out as efficiently as possible, both in terms of faster time and cheaper cost. However, in its implementation, it is necessary to conduct a study on the effectiveness and impact of technological renewal in the form of e-Court in the administrative court realm to evaluate the existing system. This research is normative legal research using statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches. In contrast, the legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials using documentary study techniques. From this study, it was found that the e-Court system can optimize the realization of the principles of good general justice in Indonesia, but in its implementation it is not yet optimal in terms of implementation and technically so that innovation and further improvements are still needed.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rosida, H., Putri, N. M., Petung Banjaransari, A. P. R., Nadiyya, A., & Sella, C. (2022). The Effectiveness of The Implementation of The e-Court Justice System and The Impact on Administrative Court in Indonesia. Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal, 2(2), 258-272. https://doi.org/10.15294/ipmhi.v2i2.58270
Section
Articles

References

Apeldoorn, Van. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 1986.
Atmosudirjo, Prajudi. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Administrasi. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1986.
Bhunia, Priynkar. “Supreme Court Od India Launches Integrated Case Management Information System for Encanced Transparancy and Efficiency.” Accessed June 30, 2022. https://www.opengovasia.com/articles/7588-supreme-Court-of-india-launches-integrated-case-management-information-system-for-enhanced-transparency-and-efficiency.
Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama. “Di Family Court of Australia, Ini Yang Dipelajari Para Inovator Pengadilan.” Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama. Last modified 2016. Accessed June 30, 2022. https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/seputar-ditjen-badilag/seputar-ditjen-badilag/di-family court-of-australia-ini-yang-dipelajari-para-inovator-pengadilan.
Hadjon, P. M. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press, 1991.
Indrati, M. F. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan: Jenis, Fungsi, Dan Materi Muatan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2007.
Indroharto. Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang Tentang Peradilan TUN, Buku 1, Beberapa Pengertian Dasar Hukum Acara TUN. Jakarta: Pustaka Dinar Harapan, 2004.
Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Court
Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions
Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power
Law Number 51 of 2019 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 on the State Administrative Court
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. KMA: "Aparatur Peradilan Harus Melayani dengan Sepenuh Hati". Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Last Modified 2017. Accessed June 30, 2022. https://mahkamahagung.go.id/id/berita/2688/kma-aparatur-peradilan-harus-melayani-dengan-sepenuh-hati.
Mardatilah, Aida. “Sejumlah Kelemahan Sidang Elektronik Dalam Praktik.” Hukum Online. Last modified 2020. Accessed June 30, 2022. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/sejumlah-kelemahan-sidang-elektronik-dalam-praktik-lt5f40072ab9863.
Marzuki, P. M. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2006.
Munandar, Mutiara Hamdalah, Yudha Chandra Arwana, and Asna Yusrina. “Legal Offerings Increase the Effectiveness of Determination of Coercive Money and Administrative Sanctions on State Administrative Decisions.” Lex Scientia Law Review 5, no. 1 (2021): 83-96.
Paridah, Baiq. “Implementasi Dan Dampak E-Court Terhadap Advokat Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Di Pengadilan Negeri Selong.” Jurnal Juridica 2, no. 1 (2020): 41-54.
Presidential Regulation No. 14 of 2005 concerning the Registrar of the Supreme Court
Salim, Agus, and Elfran Bima Muttaqin. “Persidangan Elektronik (E-Litigasi) Pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Paulus Law Journal 2, no. 1 (2020): 15–25.
Sari, N. P. R. K.. “Eksistensi E-Court Untuk Mewujudkan Asas Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 20, no. 1 (2019): 1–17.
Scholten, Paul. Penuntun Dalam Mempelajari Hukum Perdata Belanda. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press, 2005.
Shidiq, Zacfar Achmad, and Arfan Kaimuddin. “Sistem E-Court Sebagai Wujud Implementasi Asas Peradilan Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum 27, no. 3 (2021).
Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press, 2009.
Soekanto, Soerjono, and Purbacaraka Purnadi. Aneka Cara Pembedaan Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1989.
Sudarsono. “Penerapan Peradilan Elektronik Di Lingkungan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Hukum Peratun 1, no. 1 (2018): 57–78.
Susanto, Susanto. “Menciptakan Sistem Peradilan Efisien Dengan Sistem E-Court Pada Pengadilan Negeri Dan Pengadilan Agama Se-Temanggung Raya.” JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) 6, no. 1 (2020): 104-116.

Most read articles by the same author(s)