Implementation of Strict Liability by Companies in Cases of Environmental Damage in Indonesia: An Overview of State Administrative Law in Indonesia

Main Article Content

Muhammad Ainurrasyid Al Fikri

Abstract

Strict liability in the context of companies in environmental damage refers to the legal principle which states that companies can be held fully responsible for environmental damage resulting from their operational activities, without having to prove the fault or negligence of the company. This means that the company can be held responsible for environmental damage caused, whether intentionally or unintentionally. This study used normative legal research, while the approaches used are combining statutory, a conceptual and a case approach. The development of strict liability in positive law in Indonesia has experienced development and refinement over time, indicated by the application made in several cases concerning environmental violations by several irresponsible parties. Basically, the implementation of strict liability really helps the aggrieved parties, especially the common people, in enforcing environmental laws in Indonesia. The principle of strict liability in environmental damage has a number of important implications. First, companies are required to take careful precautions in their operations to prevent environmental damage. They must follow strict environmental standards and implement suitable technologies to reduce their negative impact on the environment. Second, companies must pay compensation for environmental damage resulting from their operations, even if they are not to blame for the damage. The principle of strict liability eliminates the need to prove the company's fault or negligence, therefore that the company must be financially responsible for the environmental losses incurred.

Article Details

How to Cite
Al Fikri, Muhammad Ainurrasyid. 2022. “Implementation of Strict Liability by Companies in Cases of Environmental Damage in Indonesia: An Overview of State Administrative Law in Indonesia”. Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) 5 (2), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v5i2.47460.
Section
Articles

References

Ahmadi Niyaz, Sadaf, Reza Zeinalzadeh, and Ali Raeispour Rajabali. “Study of Good Governance Effect on Environment Quality Index in Selected Developing Countries.” Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 20, No. 4 (2018): 165-177.

Astuti, Amelia Dwi, and Ika Riswanti Putranti. “Implikasi Kebijakan Indonesia dalam Menangani Kasus Pencemaran Lingkungan oleh PT. Freeport terhadap Keamanan Manusia di Mimika Papua.” Journal of International Relations 4. No. 3 (2018): 547-555.

Bakry, Muammar, et al. “Establishing Omnibus Law in Indonesia: Strict Liability in Environmental Law.” Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 24 (2021): 1-9.

Bennett, Nathan J., and Terre Satterfield. “Environmental governance: A practical framework to guide design, evaluation, and analysis.” Conservation Letters 11.6 (2018): e12600.

Fadhillah, Fajri. “Tanggung renteng dalam perkara perdata pencemaran udara dari kebakaran hutan dan lahan.” Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia 3. No. 1 (2016): 51-85.

Hafrida, Hafrida, Helmi Helmi, and Bunga Permatasari. “The Implementation of The Strict-Liability Principle to The Perpetrators of Forest and Land Burning.” Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 7, No. 3 (2020): 314-333.

Hardjaloka, Loura. “Ketepatan Hakim dalam Penerapan Precautionary Principle sebagai “Ius Cogen” dalam Kasus Gunung Mandalawangi.” Jurnal Yudisial 5, No. 2 (2012): 134-153.

Hardjasoemantri, Koesnadi. Hukum Tata Lingkungan. (Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 1994).

Imamulhadi, Imamulhadi “Perkembangan Prinsip Strict Liability dan Precautionary dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan Hidup di Pengadilan.” Mimbar Hukum 25, No. 3 (2013): 416-432.

Kartilantika, Ambar. “Penerapan Prinsip Strict Liability dalam Gugatan Ganti Rugi oleh Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan dalam Kasus Kebakaran Hutan dan/atau Lahan”, Dissertation (Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2019).

Listiyani, Nurul, Muzahid Akbar Hayat, and Subianta Mandala. “Penormaan Pengawasan Izin Lingkungan dalam Pencegahan Pencemaran dan Kerusakan Lingkungan Hidup dalam Eksploitasi Sumber Daya Alam.” Jurnal Media Hukum 25, No. 2 (2018): 217-227.

Luhukay, Roni Sulistyanto. “Tanggung Jawab PT Freeport Indonesia terhadap Penanganan Kerusakan Lingkungan Akibat Pertambangan di Kabupaten Mimika Papua.” Lex Et Societatis 4, No. 3 (2016).

Mahardika, Ahmad Gelora. “Implikasi Penghapusan Strict Liability dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Terhadap Lingkungan Hidup di Era Sustainable Development Goals.” Legacy: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundang-Undangan 2, No. 1 (2022): 58-85.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. (Jakarta: Kencana, 2008).

Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia. (Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2010).

Naldi, Ari, Herdis Herdiansyah, and LG Saraswati Putri. “Good Governance Role for a Sustainable Solid Waste Management in Rural Community.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Vol. 819. No. 1. IOP Publishing, 2021.

Notoatmojo, Soekidjo. Etika dan Hukum Kesehatan. (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010).

Parlina, Nurasti. “Penerapan Class Action di Indonesia Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1794 K/PDT/2004.” Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran 2, No. 2 (2021): 237-252.

Permana, Rizky Banyualam, Dewo Baskoro, and Arie Afriansyah. “Hukum Internasional Made in Garut? Mengkritisi Status Jus Cogens Atas Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Dalam Mandalawangi.” Bina Hukum Lingkungan 5, No. 1 (2020): 153-179.

Prasetya, Imam, Florentina Br Hombing, and Rudolf Silaban. “Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Lingkungan.” Jurnal Rectum: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana 4, No. 2 (2022): 34-45.

Putra, I., Wayan Dedi, and Kadek Agus Sadiarawan. “Perbandingan Penerapan Prinsip Pertanggungjawaban Mutlak Pada Putusan Hakim: Studi Kasus Perkara Lingkungan di Indonesia.” Magister Hukum Udayana 10 (2021): 166-176.

Rahmatillah, Syarifah, and Tasbi Husen. “Penyalahgunaan Pengelolaan Pertambangan Terhadap Kerusakan Lingkungan Hidup di Kecamatan Kluet Tengah.” LEGITIMASI: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum 7, No. 1 (2018): 149-171.

Republic of Indonesia. Law No. 23 of 1997 concerning Environmental Management. (Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara, 1997).

Republic of Indonesia. Law No. 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management. (Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara, 2009).

Republic of Indonesia. Law No. 4 of 1982 concerning Provisions and Principles of Environmental Management. (Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara, 1982).

Rifai-Hasan, Pipip Ahmad. “Development, power, and the mining industry in Papua: A study of Freeport Indonesia.” Journal of Business Ethics 89 (2009): 129-143.

Romsan, H. Achmad, Abunawar Basyeban, and Moh Idris. “The Use of the Strict Liability Principle by the Indonesian Courts in Solving Environmental Conflicts.” 6th International Conference on Community Development (ICCD 2019). Atlantis Press, 2019.

Santosa, Ahmad. Good Governance Hukum Lingkungan. (Jakarta: ICEL, 2001).

Sukananda, Satria, and Danang Adi Nugraha. “Urgensi Penerapan Analisis Dampak Lingkungan (AMDAL) Sebagai Kontrol Dampak Terhadap Lingkungan di Indonesia.” Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan 1, No. 2 (2020).

Symon, Andrew. “The Politics of Power: Freeport in Suharto's Indonesia.” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs 26, No. 2 (2004): 379-383.

Wahyuni, Sri, et al. “Konsistensi Putusan Hakim Terhadap Perkara Kerugian Lingkungan Hidup di Indonesia.” ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan 15, No. 2 (2021): 197-216.

Wibisana, Andri Gunawan. “The many faces of strict liability in Indonesia's wildfire litigation.” Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 28, No. 2 (2019): 185-196.

Wulandari, Purnomo, and Sri Endah Wahyuningsih. “The Strict Liability by Corporate in Enforcement of Environmental Law.” Law Development Journal 2, No. 4 (2021): 477-488.