Implications of the Limits for Filing a Lawsuit to the State Administrative Court: Upholding Legal Certainty or Injuring Human Rights?
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The State Administrative Court (PTUN) plays an important role in adjudicating state administrative conflicts, issuing final and impactful State Administrative Decisions (KTUN). Recipients aggrieved by these decisions have a 90-day window, as mandated by Article 55 of the Administrative Court Law (UU PTUN), to file a lawsuit if they believe the KTUN violates established laws, regulations, or principles of good governance. Despite its apparent procedural clarity, the 90-day timeframe has become a subject of public controversy, prompting four challenges to its constitutionality before the Constitutional Court. Critics argue that this stringent deadline, rather than achieving its intended goals of legal certainty and political stability, poses a potential threat to human rights. This study employs normative legal research techniques, library law research, and meticulous data collection to dissect the complexities surrounding the State Administrative Court's lawsuit filing deadline. The findings underscore the contentious nature of the 90-day limit, emphasizing its potential adverse effects on human rights and its perceived departure from its intended purposes. By elucidating these dimensions, the study aims to foster a deeper understanding of the controversy and its implications.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All works published in the Indonesian State Law Review are licensed & copyrighted under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
The editorial board of the Indonesian State Law Review shares common vision with Universitas Negeri Semarang as a Publisher in providing unrestricted access to knowledge and education for all and thereby follows Open Access Policy to showcase its content. The Indonesian State Law Review follows open access copyright and licensing policy on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Universitas Negeri Semarang and the Indonesian State Law Review adhere to Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License. The authors submitting and publishing in the Indonesian State Law Review agree to the copyright policy under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Under this license, the authors published in the Indonesian State Law Review retain the copyright including publishing rights of their scholarly work and agree to let others remix, tweak, and even build upon their work commercially (for academic, scientific, and common purposes). All other authors using the content of the Indonesian State Law Review are required to cite author(s) and publisher in their work.
References
Aspani, Budi. "Eksistensi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan." Jurnal Universitas Palembang 17, no. 2 (2019): 114-121.
Baherman, Herman. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Upaya Administratif Sebagai Syarat Formal Pengajuan Gugatan di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (Studi Analisis Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2018 Tentang Pedoman Penyelesaian Sengketa Administrasi Pemerintahan Setelah Menempuh Upaya Admininstratif)”. Thesis. (Bengkulu: IAIN Bengkulu, 2020).
Bahri, Teuku Saiful. Hukum Tata Negara dan Hukum Administrasi Negara dalam Tataran Reformasi Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. (Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2018).
Bedner, Adriaan. Administrative Courts in Indonesia: A Socio-Legal Study. Vol. 6. (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2001).
Bourchier, David. "Magic memos, collusion and judges with attitude: notes on the politics of law in contemporary Indonesia." In Law, Capitalism and Power in Asia. (London: Routledge, 2006), pp. 199-215.
Chafid, Moch, and Anna Erliyana. "Implikasi Procedural Time-Limits atas Gugatan Keputusan Administrasi Negara (Studi Banding: Indonesia, Australia, Kanada)." Administrative Law and Governance Journal 3 no. 4 (2020): 742-763.
Crouch, Melissa, ed. The Politics of Court Reform: Judicial Change and Legal Culture in Indonesia. (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2019).
Dalimunthe, Fadli Zaini. "The Comparison of Evidence in State Administrative Court Between Indonesia and South Korea." Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 9 no. 2 (2020): 232-254.
Darmansya, Adimas Gusti, and Rasji Rasji. "Analisis Upaya Penyelundupan Hukum dalam Upaya Menghindari Syarat Jangka Waktu 90 Hari dalam Mengajukan Gugatan Ke Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Studi Putusan Nomor 51/G/2020/PTUN. PLG)." Jurnal Hukum Adigama 4 no. 2 (2021): 1509-1533.
Darmansyah, Adimas Gusti, and Rasji Rasji. "Analysis of Law Evasion Effort to Avoid the 90 Days Time Requisite in Filing a Lawsuit to the State Administrative Court (Decision Number 51/G/2020/PTUN. PLG)." 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2021). Atlantis Press, 2022.
Effendi, Maftuh. "Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia Suatu Pemikiran Ke Arah Perluasan Kompetensi Pasca Amandemen Kedua Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara." Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 3 no. 1 (2018): 25-36.
Hadjon, Philipus M. "Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Konteks Undang-Undang No. 30 Th. 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan." Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 4 no. 1 (2015): 51-64.
Hapsari, Elisabeth Putri, Lapon Tukan Leonard, and Ayu Putriyanti. "Kewenangan Hakim Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Menggunakan Asas Ultra Petita Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 5k/tun/1992 (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 32/g/2012/ptun. smg)." Diponegoro Law Journal 6.2 (2017): 1-18.
Herlambang, Pratama Herry, and Tri Sulistiyono. "Peran Pengadilan dalam Proses Eksekusi Putusan Yang Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Semarang (The Role of the Court in the Process of Executing Decisions that Have Permanent Legal Force at the Semarang State Administrative Court)." Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) 3 no. 1 (2020): 39-45.
Herlambang, Unu Putra. "Permasalahan Tenggang Waktu Pengajuan Gugatan oleh Pihak Ketiga Dalam Perkara Tata Usaha Negara." AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2 no. 2 (2021): 111-122.
Jaelani, Abdul Kadir. "Implementasi Daluarsa Gugatan dalam Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia." Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum 18 no. 2 (2020): 56-70.
Kadir, Abdul, La Ode Bariun, and Winner Agustinus Siregar. "Tenggang Waktu Pengajuan Gugatan Pada Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Kendari Pasca Berlakunya Perma No. 6 Tahun 2018." Jurnal Restorative Justice 6 no. 1 (2022): 56-75.
Letter of Application for Material Review Article 55 of Law No. 51 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law no. 5 of 1986 concerning the State Administrative Court (PTUN) regarding the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD 1945), available online at https://www.mkri.id/public/filepermohonan/Permohonan_3353_3081_Permohonan.pdf
Liyan, Zhang. “State Compensation Extent in Civil and Administrative Suit.” Journal of Liaoning Police Academy (2002).
Mahanani, Anajeng Esri Edhi. "Pemetaan Normatif Logika Pengecualian Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara." Widya Pranata Hukum: Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum 3 no. 1 (2021): 76-89.
Marvin, Renius Albert. "Polemik Jangka Waktu Pengajuan Gugatan ke Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara." Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 49 no. 4 (2019): 942-958.
Mawardi, Ivan. Paradigma Baru PTUN Respon Peradilan Administrasi Terhadap Demokratisasi. Yogyakarta: Thafa Media, 2016).
McCrudden, Christopher. "Legal Research and the Social Sciences." In Legal Theory and the Social Sciences. (London: Routledge, 2017), pp. 149-167.
McConville, Mike, ed. Research Methods for Law. (Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press, 2017).
Puhi, Oyaldi, Rustam Hs Akili, and Roy Marthen Moonti. "The Settlement of Abuse of Authority by Government Officials." The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education 2 no. 1 (2020): 85-100.
Pujianti, Sri. “Aturan Batas Waktu Gugatan dalam UU PTUN Digugat”, Online News Constitutional Court the Republic of Indonesia, March 26, 2018. Available online at https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=14378.
Putriyanti, Ayu. "Kajian Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan dalam Kaitan dengan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara." Pandecta Research Law Journal 10 no. 2 (2015): 180-194.
Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration. (Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara, 2014). Available online at https://peraturan.go.id/id/uu-no-30-tahun-2014
Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning the State Administrative Court (referred as PTUN Law). (Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara, 1986). Available online at https://peraturan.go.id/files/uu5-1986.pdf
Rezah, Farah Syah. Hukun Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. (Makassar: CV. Social Politic Genius, 2018).
Riza, Dola. "Hakikat KTUN Menurut Undang-undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Vs Undang-undang Admnistrasi Pemerintahan." Soumatera Law Review 2, no. 2 (2019): 207-220.
Riza, Dola. "Hakikat KTUN Menurut Undang-undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Vs Undang-undang Admnistrasi Pemerintahan." Soumatera Law Review 2 no. 2 (2019): 207-220.
Riza, Dola. "Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Menurut Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dan Undang-Undang Admnistrasi Pemerintahan." Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 3 no. 1 (2018): 85-102.
Salam, Alaa Foaud, and Saab Naji Aboud. "Dismissing The Judicial Claim in The Administrative Lawsuit." Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture 33 (2023): 2411-2427.
Setyowati, Herning. "The Judges Ethics and Justice: An Analysis of Law Enforcement in Indonesian Court System." Law Research Review Quarterly 7 no. 4 (2021): 403-416.
Simanjuntak, Enrico. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Transformasi & Refleksi. (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021).
Untoro, Untoro. "Self-Rescpect dan Kesadaran Hukum Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Menuju Keadilan." Pandecta Research Law Journal 13 no. 1 (2018): 37-49.
Utama, Kartika Widya. "Surat keputusan tata usaha negara yang bersifat fiktif positif." Notarius 8 no. 2 (2015): 141-251.
Wahyunadi, Yodi Martono. "Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Konteks Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan." Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 5 no. 1 (2016): 135-154.
Wibowo, Mardian, I. Nyoman Nurjaya, and Muchammad Ali Safaat. "The Criticism on the Meaning of “Open Legal Policy” in Verdicts of Judicial Review at the Constitutional Court Mardian Wibowo." Constitutional Review 3 no. 2 (2018): 262-286.
Wijayanti, Winda. "Eksistensi Undang-Undang Sebagai Produk Hukum dalam Pemenuhan Keadilan Bagi Rakyat (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 50/PUU-X/2012)." Jurnal Konstitusi 10 no. 1 (2013): 179-204.
Xin-hua, Gao. “The Historical Limitation of the Plaintiff’s Qualification in Administrative Litigation in the New Judicial Interpretation.” Journal Liaoning Normal University (2005).
Yasa, Putu Gede Arya Sumerta, et al. "Position of Fictitious Positive Administrative Decisions as Dispute Object of State Administrative Court: Indonesia Omnibus Law Perspective." Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 24 no. 5 (2021): 1-12.
Yuslism, Yuslim. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016).