The Debate on the Grace Period in Appealing Cases Against the State Administrative Court
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study delves into the nuanced discourse surrounding the grace period concerning appeals against decisions rendered by the State Administrative Court (Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara, PTUN) in Indonesia. Against the backdrop of Indonesia’s evolving legal landscape and commitment to administrative justice, this research critically examines the existing grace period and its implications for litigants, judicial efficiency, and the broader pursuit of fairness. The study considers perspectives from legal scholars, practitioners, and policymakers within the Indonesian context, assessing the necessity and efficacy of the current grace period. Additionally, the research explores comparative legal frameworks, offering insights into how other jurisdictions navigate the delicate balance between finality in administrative decisions and ensuring access to justice. Through case studies and empirical analysis, the study evaluates the practical impact of the grace period on the Indonesian legal system. It aims to identify potential areas for improvement and inform discussions on legal reforms that align with Indonesia’s commitment to enhancing governance, rule of law, and the overall administration of justice. By engaging with Indonesia's unique administrative and legal challenges, this research contributes not only to the academic discourse but also holds practical implications for legal practitioners, policymakers, and stakeholders involved in shaping the country’s legal framework. Ultimately, the study aspires to be a catalyst for informed discussions and potential reforms that will strengthen the Indonesian State Administrative Court system, fostering a more equitable and efficient dispensation of administrative justice.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All works published in the Indonesian State Law Review are licensed & copyrighted under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
The editorial board of the Indonesian State Law Review shares common vision with Universitas Negeri Semarang as a Publisher in providing unrestricted access to knowledge and education for all and thereby follows Open Access Policy to showcase its content. The Indonesian State Law Review follows open access copyright and licensing policy on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Universitas Negeri Semarang and the Indonesian State Law Review adhere to Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License. The authors submitting and publishing in the Indonesian State Law Review agree to the copyright policy under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Under this license, the authors published in the Indonesian State Law Review retain the copyright including publishing rights of their scholarly work and agree to let others remix, tweak, and even build upon their work commercially (for academic, scientific, and common purposes). All other authors using the content of the Indonesian State Law Review are required to cite author(s) and publisher in their work.
References
Allen, Jonathan. "Balancing Justice and Social Unity: Political Theory and the Idea of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission." The University of Toronto Law Journal 49, no. 3 (1999): 315-353.
Arifin, Ridwan. "Democracy on Indonesian Legal Reform: How Can People Participate on Laws and Regulations Establishment Process." Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 2, no. 2 (2017): 155-158.
Arifin, Ridwan. "Translating the Meaning of Justice and Legal Protection: What exactly is justice?." Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 7, no. 1 (2022): i-iv.
Armiati, Ratih, and Latifah Amir. "Analisis Yuridis Pertimbangan Hakim Atas Gugatan Lewat Waktu dalam Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Jambi Nomor 5/G/2017/PTUN. JBI." Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law 1, no. 1 (2020): 37-48.
Arwanto, Bambang. "Kewenangan PTUN dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum oleh Pemerintah (Onrechmatige Overheidsdaad)." Jatiswara 33, no. 2 (2018).
Bakker, Laurens, and Jaap Timmer. "Justice in Indonesia: The social life of a momentous concept." The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 15, no. 4 (2014): 293-301.
Bix, Brian H. "Radbruch’s Formula, Conceptual Analysis, and the Rule of Law." In Law, Liberty, and the Rule of Law. (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2013), pp. 65-75.
Bix, Brian H. "Robert Alexy, Radbruch's Formula, and the Nature of Legal Theory." Rechtstheorie 37 (2006): 139-149.
Buonsu, I. Gede, AA Sagung Laksmi Dewi, and Luh Putu Suryani. "Keputusan Fiktif Sebagai Dasar Pengajuan Gugatan Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara." Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 2, no. 1 (2021): 68-72.
Butt, Simon, and Tim Lindsey. "Judicial mafia: The courts and state illegality in Indonesia." In The State and Illegality in Indonesia. (London: Brill, 2010), pp. 189-213.
Cavanagh, Ralph, and Austin Sarat. "Thinking about Courts: Toward and Beyond a Jurisprudence of Judicial Competence." Law and Society Review (1980): 371-420.
Chroust, Anton-Hermann. "The philosophy of law of Gustav Radbruch." The Philosophical Review 53, no. 1 (1944): 23-45.
Coudert, Frederic R. "Certainty and Justice." The Yale Law Journal 14, no. 7 (1905): 361-373.
Darmansyah, Adimas Gusti, and Rasji Rasji. "Analysis of Law Evasion Effort to Avoid the 90 Days Time Requisite in Filing a Lawsuit to the State Administrative Court (Decision Number 51/G/2020/PTUN. PLG)." 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2021). Atlantis Press, 2022.
de Gurmendi, Silvia Fernández. "Judges: Selection, Competence, Collegiality." American Journal of International Law 112 (2018): 163-167.
Dewi, Yustina Trihoni Nalesti, W. Riawan Tjandra, and Grant R. Niemann. "Independence of Judicial Power as a Foundation of Human Rights Judicial Function in Indonesia." International Journal of Social Science and Humanity 6, no. 3 (2016): 239-242.
Effendi, Maftuh. "Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia Suatu Pemikiran Ke Arah Perluasan Kompetensi Pasca Amandemen Kedua Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara." Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 3, no. 1 (2018): 25-36.
Fauzani, Muhammad Addi. "The Shifting in the Legal Politics of Regulating the General Principles of Good Governance in Indonesian Legislation." As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law 3, no. 1 (2023): 1-24.
Gunawan, Andy, and I. Wayan Arthanaya. "Fungsi Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Hukum Acara Tata Usaha Negara." Jurnal Analogi Hukum 1, no. 1 (2019): 28-33.
Gunawan, Bambang Panji, et al. "The Development of Indonesia as the Rule of Law Based on 1945 Constitution Before and After Amendments." YURISDIKSI: Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains 16, no. 2 (2020): 64-73.
Hakim, M. Aunul, and Sheila Kusuma Wardani Amnesti. "Problematika Penanganan Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum oleh Pemerintah (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad) Pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara." De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah 14, no. 1 (2022): 125-139.
Halpin, Andrew. "Austin's Methodology? His Bequest to Jurisprudence." The Cambridge Law Journal 70, no. 1 (2011): 175-202.
Hendrianto, Stefanus. "The rise and fall of heroic chief justices: constitutional politics and judicial leadership in Indonesia." Washington International Law Journal 25.3 (2016): 489-528.
Heryansyah, Despan. "Shifting the Absolute Competence of State Administrative Justice in the Indonesian Legal System." International and Public Affairs 4, no. 2 (2020): 28-34.
Jaelani, Abdul Kadir. "Implementasi Daluarsa Gugatan Dalam Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia." Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum 18, no. 2 (2020): 56-70.
Kadir, Abdul, La Ode Bariun, and Winner Agustinus Siregar. "Tenggang Waktu Pengajuan Gugatan Pada Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Kendari Pasca Berlakunya Perma No. 6 Tahun 2018." Jurnal Restorative Justice 6, no. 1 (2022): 56-75.
Kalaij, Bernadetta Satyaayu Regitaningtyas, et al. "Penerapan Gugatan Perwakilan Kelompok dalam Pengujian Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara." Padjadjaran Law Review 11, no. 1 (2023): 91-101.
Kristian, Denny. "Upaya Permohonan Putusan Fiktif Positif Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum dalam Lingkup Administrasi Pemerintahan." Lex Administratum 8, no. 1 (2020): 114-122.
Kurniawan, Itok Dwi. "Correlation between Justice, Legal Certainty, and Benefit in Law Enforcement in Indonesia." JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah 8, no. 4 (2023): 3970-3977.
Langbroek, Philip M., et al. "Methodology of legal research: Challenges and opportunities." Utrecht Law Review 13, no. 3 (2017): 1-8.
Lifante-Vidal, Isabel. "Is legal certainty a formal value?." Jurisprudence 11, no. 3 (2020): 456-467; Braithwaite, John. "Rules and principles: A theory of legal certainty." Australasian Journal of Legal Philosophy 27, no. 2002 (2002): 47-82.
Martana, Nyoman, et al. "Discourses of Legal Certainty in Execution of Administrative Court Decision." Substantive Justice International Journal of Law 2, no. 2 (2019): 89-117.
Máynez, Eduardo García. "Justice and Legal Security." Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9, no. 3 (1949): 496-503.
Misranto, Misranto. "Penanganan Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara (TUN) Yang Tidak Termasuk Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara (KTUN) Oleh Peradilan Umum (PU) Setelah Penerapan Undang-undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2004 Tentang PTUN." Perspektif 11, no. 2 (2006): 120-132.
Muslih, Muhammad. "Negara Hukum Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Teori Hukum Gustav Radbruch (Tiga Nilai Dasar Hukum)." Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum 4, no. 1 (2017): 130-152.
Mutiah, Novia Isro’atul. "Legal Injustice in the Perspective of Pancasila: Various Recent Developments in Indonesia." Indonesian Journal of Pancasila and Global Constitutionalism 2, no. 1 (2023): 85-102.
Nurhidayati, Syssy, and Arif Wibowo. "Konsekuensi Kompetensi Absolut Terhadap PTUN Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan." MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum 3, no. 2 (2023): 118-128.
Putriyanti, Ayu. "Kajian Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan dalam Kaitan dengan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara." Pandecta Research Law Journal 10, no. 2 (2015): 180-194.
Radbruch, Gustav. "Five minutes of legal philosophy (1945)." Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26, no. 1 (2006): 13-15.
Raphael, David Daiches. Concepts of Justice. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001); Campbell, Tom, and Tom Campbell. What Justice is About. (London: Macmillan Education UK, 1988).
Republic of Indonesia. Indonesian Constitution of 1945 (Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945).
Republic of Indonesia. Supreme Court Circular Number 1 of 2017 concerning Implementation of the Formulation of the Results of the 2017 Supreme Court Chamber Plenary Meeting as Guidelines for the Implementation of Duties for the Court (Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemberlakukan Rumusan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2017 Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Bagi Pengadilan). (Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara, 2017). Available online at https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/legal-product/sema-nomor-1-tahun-2017/detail
Rezah, Farah Syah.Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. (Makassar: CV Social Politic Genius, 2018).
Rodiyah, Rodiyah, Siti Hafsyah Idris, and Robert Brian Smith. "Mainstreaming Justice in the Establishment of Laws and Regulations Process: Comparing Case in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Australia." Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 8, no. 1 (2023): 333-378.
Rokilah, Rokilah. " Dinamika Negara Hukum Indonesia: Antara Rechtsstaat dan Rule of Law." Nurani Hukum 2, no. 1 (2019): 12-22.
Rokilah, Rokilah. "The Role of the Regulations in Indonesia State System." Ajudikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 1 (2020): 29-38.
Romdoni, Muhamad, et al. "A critique and solution of justice, certainty, and usefulness in law enforcement in Indonesia." Journal of Law Science 5, no. 4 (2023): 174-181.
Samosir, Tetti. "Efektifikasi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara." ADIL: Jurnal Hukum 6, no. 2 (2015): 182-197.
Sandy, Aditya, and Tuti Widyaningrum. "Analisis Putusan Perkara Nomor 29/G/2012/PTUN.JKT yang Didasarkan atas Daluwarsa." Lex Certa 5, no. 1 (2019): 113-125.
SEMA No. SK No. 2 of 1991 Guidelines for the Implementation of several provisions in Law No. 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Court. Available online at https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/index.php/legal-product/sema-no-02-tahun-1991/detail
Simanjuntak, Enrico. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Transformasi dan Refleksi. (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018).
Sobari, Ahmad. "Menguji Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Pada UU Nomor 9 Tahun 2004 Menjadi Norma Hukum Yang Dapat Menentukan Kesalahan Berdasarkan Praktik di PTUN." Populis: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora 8, no. 1 (2023): 92-99.
Soekanto, Soerjono. "Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan Hukum." Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 6, no. 6 (2017): 429-439.
Soetami, A. Siti. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. (Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2016).
Spaak, Torben. "Meta-ethics and legal theory: The case of Gustav Radbruch." Law and Philosophy 28, no. 3 (2009): 261-290.
Sutiyoso, Bambang. "Mencari Format Ideal Keadilan Putusan dalam Peradilan." Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 17, no. 2 (2010): 217-232.
Syahrizal, Darda. Hukum Administrasi Negara dan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. (Jakarta: Media Pressindo, 2013).
Triwulan, Titik. Hukum Tata Usaha Negara dan Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia. (Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2016).
Utama, Kartika Widya. "Surat Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Yang Bersifat Fiktif Positif." Notarius 8, no. 2 (2015): 141-251.
Utari, Indah Sri, and Ridwan Arifin. "Law Enforcement and Legal Reform in Indonesia and Global Context: How the Law Responds to Community Development?." Journal of Law and Legal Reform 1, no. 1 (2020): 1-4.