Discourses on Citizen Lawsuit as Administrative Dispute Object: Government Administration Law vs. Administrative Court Law

Main Article Content

Kadek Agus Sudiarawan
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4708-1701
Alia Yofira Karunian
Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9433-827X
Bagus Hermanto
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0220-5574

Abstract

Citizen lawsuit mechanism has been used several times in Indonesian court procedure, although there is no regulation in this matter. The aims of this study were to determine the characteristic of citizen lawsuit in Indonesia, and the expansion meaning of the state administrative decision after the enactment of government administration law, as well as the potential for citizen lawsuit as dispute object of the state administrative court with comparation with serval countries in order to provide an appropriate legal system of citizen lawsuit as ius constituendum. This article used normative legal research with a conceptual approach, legislative approach, and comparative approach. The results indicated that the characteristic of a citizen lawsuit in Indonesia is generally a citizen access to represent the public interest in condition that the state fails to fulfill the rights of its citizen, and the plaintiff does not need to describe the losses he has suffered directly. The expansion of the meaning of state administrative decision under the Government Administrative Law has resulted in the competence of court and the dispute object has been expanded, thus if the citizen lawsuit is viewed from the administrative dispute perspective, it should be included in the State Administrative Court object. However, due to the limited expansion of Article 87 of the Government Administration Law by the Administrative Court Law, both of which are still valid, the State Administrative Court is not authorized to examine and adjudicate citizen lawsuits. Based on comparative data, there are several weaknesses of the citizen lawsuit system such as the legal standing of the applicant/plaintiff which make several countries have changed the provisions of the regulation.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sudiarawan, K. A., Karunian, A. Y., Mangku, D. G. S., & Hermanto, B. (2022). Discourses on Citizen Lawsuit as Administrative Dispute Object: Government Administration Law vs. Administrative Court Law. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 7(2), 499-486. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i2.60166
Section
Research Articles
Author Biographies

Kadek Agus Sudiarawan, Faculty of Law, Universitas Udayana

Kadek Agus Sudiarawan is a lecturer in the Faculty of Law, Universitas Udayana, Indonesia and currently sitting as the Editor in Chief for several law journals under the faculty, as well as the Secretary for the Publication Unit of Universitas Udayana. Now he also as student of Doctoral of Law Program at the Faculty of Law Universitas Udayana. Some of his recent publications such as Classification of Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement in Indonesia: is it Necessary? (Hasanuddin Law Review, 2022),  Automatic Exchange of Information (AEoI) for Indonesian Tax Purposes : Economic Analysis of Law Approach (Lex Scientia Law Review,2022), Position of Fictitious Positive Administrative Decisions as Dispute Object of State Administrative Court: Indonesia Omnibus Law Perspective (Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 2021) and The Exploitation of Indigenous Communities by Commercial Actors: Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expression (Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 2021).

Alia Yofira Karunian, Edinburgh Law School, The University of Edinburgh

Alia Yofira Karunian is LL.M. candidate Student at School of Law, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom and previously she is active as Researcher and Counselor on ELSAM, one of the most prominent NGOs that concerned on Human Rights issues in Indonesia. Previously she also graduated on S.H./LL.B. degree at Udayana University. Some of her recent publication including Digital IDs Rooted in Justice: Lived Experiences and Civil Society Advocacy Towards Better Systems (The Engine Room, 2022); Data Profiling and Elections: Has Data-Driven Political Campaign Gone Too Far? (Udayana Journal Law and Culture, 2019); and Inkonsistensi Kebijakan Energi di Indonesia: Kaitannya terhadap Pemberlakuan Standar Emisi Gas Buang Euro 4 (Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia, 2018).

Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku, Faculty of Law and Social Science, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku is a Lecturer at the Department of Law, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia. His area of expertise concerning International Law, Comparative Law, Law and Society, as well as Law and Culture. Some of his recent publications such as Crimes of Genocide in the Viewpoint of International Criminal Law (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies, 2022), Analysis of Diplomatic Law in Lifting the Honorary Consul of The State of Indonesia To Palestine (Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 2022), and The Role of the National Agency for Border Management in Maintaining the Territorial Sovereignty in the Land Bord between Indonessia and Timor Leste (Ahmad Dahlan International Conference on Law and Social Justice).Now, he also serving as Head of Department of Law at the Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia.

Bagus Hermanto, Faculty of Law, Universitas Udayana

Bagus Hermanto currently active as Assistant Researchers and Legal Practitioners on Constitutional Law issues at Universitas Udayana and Universitas Bali Dwipa. He has expertise on Legislation, Legislative Studies, Constitutional Law, Human Rights Law, as well as Public Policy and Legal Political Studies. He has been graduated on S.H./LL.B. and M.H./LL.M. at Universitas Udayana and he fellows on Short Course of Basic Principles of Administrative Law, Yamaguchi University Japan. Some of his recent publications including Law Reform as the Part of National Resilience: Discovering Hindu and Pancasila Values in Indonesia’s Legal Development Plan (International Proceedings of the International Conference for Democracy and National Resilience (ICDNR 2021); Between Mental Illness, Criminal Policy Reform, and Human Rights: Discourse on Reformulation of The Article 44 Indonesia Criminal Code (International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 2022); and Deliberate legislative reforms to improve the legislation quality in developing countries: case of Indonesia (Theory and Practice of Legislation, in-press, June 2022).

References

Ahmadov, F. T. (2017). The Right of Actio Popularis before International Courts and Tribunals. Oxford: University of Oxford.

Arifin, R. (2022). Translating the Meaning of Justice and Legal Protection: What exactly is justice?. JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies), 7(1), i-iv. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i1.57881.

Baety, L. A. (2017). Dampak Hukum Perluasan Kewenangan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 dan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014. Thesis. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Bimasakti, M. A. (2020). Merekonstruksi Paradigma Gugatan Citizen Lawsuit Di Indonesia Sebagai Sengketa Administrasi. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 50(1), 230. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2492.

Bedner, A. (2013). Indonesian Legal Scholarship and Jurisprudence as an Obstacle for Transplanting Legal Institutions, Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 5(2), 253-273. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404512001145.

Chen, A.H.Y. (2010). Pathways of Western liberal constitutional development in Asia: A comparative study of five major nations, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 8(4), 849–884. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor002.

Crouch, M. (2021). The Challenges for Court Reform after Authoritarian Rule: The Role of Specialized Courts in Indonesia, Constitutional Review, 7(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev711.

Emadewani, P. (2009). Pertimbangan Hakim Mengabulkan Gugatan Citizen Lawsuit dalam Perkara Lingkungan Hidup. Jurnal Verstek, 7(3), 139–145. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/verstek/article/view/38277.

Fatah, A. (2013). Gugatan Warga Negara Sebagai Mekanisme Pemenuhan Hak Asasi Manusia dan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara. Yuridika, 28(3), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v28i3.347.

Fatah, A. (2019). Citizen Lawsuit in Environmental Cases. Lentera Hukum, 6(2), 287-306. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v6i2.9675.

Flatt, E. P. (1991). Citizen Suits under the Clean Water Act: Post-Complaint Compliance Does Not Moot Requests for Penalties, Atlantic States Legal Foundation v. Tyson Foods. Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository, 2(1), 1–20.

Gárdos-Orosz, F. (2012). The Hungarian Constitutional Court in Transition – from Actio Popularis to Constitutional Complaint. Acta Juridica Hungarica, 53(4), 302–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1556/ajur.53.2012.4.3.

Han, S. L. (2017). Background Memorandum Public Interest Litigation in China. Paul Tsai China Center of Yale Law School, 1–24.

Hermanto, B., & Mas Aryani, N. (2021). Omnibus legislation as a tool of legislative reform by developing countries: Indonesia, Turkey and Serbia practice. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 9(3), 425-450. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2022.2027162.

Hermanto, B. (2022). Deliberate legislative reforms to improve the legislation quality in developing countries: case of Indonesia. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2022.2080392.

Iqbal, M. (2012). Aspek Hukum Class Action dan Citizen Law Suit Serta Perkembangannya di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 1(1), 89–112. https://jurnalhukumdanperadilan.org/index.php/jurnalhukumperadilan/article/view/148.

Jaja, T. C., & Aditya, Z. F. (2022). Promoting the Good Governance by Advancing the Role of Parliamentarians and the Term Offices Limitation (Comparing Nigeria and Indonesia). JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies), 7(1), 265-298. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i1.54776.

Jayantiari, I. G. A. M. R., Sudiarawan, K. A., & Dewi, T. I. D. W. P. (2020). Pembangunan Hukum Berorientasi Keadilan Melalui Harmonisasi Hukum Negara dan Hukum Adat, Jurnal Majelis, 2(1), 151-174.

Julaiddin, J, & Sari, H. P. (2019). Citizen Lawsuit (Gugatan Warga Negara) Terhadap Penyelenggara Negara dalam Mencari Keadilan. Swara Justisia, 1(1), 13–23.

Krinsky, D. (2006). How To Sue Without Standing: The Constitutionality of Citizen Suits in Non-Article III Tribunals. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 57, 1–48. https://ssrn.com/abstract=930836.

Mahkamah Agung. (2009). Class Action & Citizen Lawsuit: Laporan Penelitian. Jakarta: Badan Litbang Diklat Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI. Available online at < https://perpustakaan.mahkamahagung.go.id/read/ebook/49>

Martana, N., et.al. (2019). Discourses of Legal Certainty in Execution of Administrative Court Decision. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 2(2), 89-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v2i2.35.

Mangku, D.G.S., et.al., (2022). Implementation of e-court in settlement of civil cases in district court, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2573, 030004-1. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0104105.

Naviah, F. (2013). Penerapan Mekanisme Gugatan Citizen Lawsuit dalam Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia. Jurnal Verstek, 1(3), 1–12. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/verstek/article/view/38815.

Nasir, C. (2018). Pengawasan terhadap Kebijakan Pemerintah Melalui Mekanisme Citizen Lawsuit. Jurnal Konstitusi, 14(4), 906. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk14410.

Noor, H., J., Afkar, K, & Glaser, H. (2021). Application of Sanctions Against State Administrative Officials Failing to Implement Administrative Court Decisions. Bestuur, 9(1), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v9i1.49686

Pompe, S. (2005). The Indonesian Supreme Court: A Study of Institutional Collapse. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.

Pratami, N. L. A. D. P. (2017). Karakteristik Gugatan Warga Negara (Citizen Lawsuit) dan Perbandingannya dengan Gugatan Perwakilan Kelompok (Class Action). Kertha Wicara, 6(4), 1–6. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthawicara/article/view/34224.

Sudiarawan, K. A., Wairocana, I. G. N., & Hermanto, B. (2020). Are there Obstacles after the Administrative Court Absolute Competence Extension of Indonesia?. Varia Justicia, 16(2), 156-169. https://doi.org/10.31603/variajusticia.v16i2.3590.

Sudiarawan, K. A. (2019). Rekonstruksi Pergeseran Paradigma Upaya Administratif dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pra Pemilihan Kepala Daerah, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 16(3), 325-343, https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v16i3.505.

Sugianto, I. (2004). Hak Gugat Warga Negara (Citizen Lawsuit) terhadap Negara-Kajian Putusan No. 28/Pdt.G/2003/PN.Jkt.Pusat. Majalah Dictum Jurnal Kajian Putusan Pengadilan, 41.

Tong, J. W., & Zheng, Y. S. (2020). Citizen Lawsuits Against the Government in China : Twenty Court Cases , 2013 – 2019. Chinese Law & Government, 51(2–3), 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094609.2019.1710434.

Verschuuren, J. (2009). The Role of the Judiciary in Environmental Governance Publication: Comparative Perspectives, 4. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International BV., pp. 55–83. Available at

Wairocana, I. G. N., Layang, I. W. B. S., Sudiarta, K., Martana, P. A. H., Sudiarawan, K. A., & Pramana, I. G. P. (2019). Dinamika Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Pasca UU Administrasi Pemerintahan. Thesis. Denpasar Bali: Universitas Udayana.

Wairocana, I., Sudiarta, I. K., Layang, I. W. B. S., Siki, W. B., Sudiarawan, K. A., Pramana, I., & Pasek, G. (2019). The Expansion of Administrative Decision Meaning Based on Government Administration Law: A Dispute Submission Process Approach. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 8(1), 13-33.

Wairocana, I. G. N., Layang, I. W. B. S., Sudiarta, K., Martana, P. A. H., Sudiarawan, K. A., & Hermanto, B. (2021). Kendala dan Cara Hakim Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Pasca Uu Administrasi Pemerintahan: Suatu Pendekatan Atas Penanganan Perkara Fiktif Positif. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 50(3), 563-585. http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no3.2755.

Wibowo, S., & Wijaya, M. (2021). Implementation of the Small Claims Court in Dispute Case Settlement in Indonesia. Lex Scientia Law Review, 5(1), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v5i1.42859.

Wiratraman, H. P. (2022). Constitutional Struggles and the Court in Indonesia’s Turn to Authoritarian Politics. Federal Law Review, 50(3), 314–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0067205X221107404.

Yasa, P. G. A. S., Sudiarawan, K. A., Pratama, A. C. P. N., & Pranajaya, M. D. (2021). Position of Fictitious Positive Administrative Decisions as Dispute Object of State Administrative Court: Indonesia Omnibus Law Perspective. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(5), 1-12.

Yuliartini, N. P. R., Putra, I. B. W., Atmaja, G. M. W., & Mangku, D. G. S. (2022). The Construction of National Legal Systems from Pancasila's Perspective. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 7(2), 479-488. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v7i2p479-488.

Yusa, I. G., Hermanto, B., & Ardani, N. K. (2021, December). Law Reform as the Part of National Resilience: Discovering Hindu and Pancasila Values in Indonesia’s Legal Development Plan. In International Conference for Democracy and National Resilience (ICDNR 2021) (pp. 1-10). Atlantis Press. https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211221.001.

Zulaeha, M. (2017). Mengatasi Kabut Asap Melalui Mekanisme Citizen Lawsuit. Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia, 3(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.38011/jhli.v3i1.35.

Most read articles by the same author(s)