Beningga, JS, Berkowitz, M.W Kuen, P and Smith, K. 2003. The Reliasionship Of Character Education Implementation and Academic Achievment in Elemantary School. Fresno: California State Univercity
Chou, Mei Ju, Yang, Chen-Hsin, & Huang. 2014. The Beauty of Character Education on Prescholl Children Parentchild Relationship. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science. 2(3): 527-533.
Dewanti, Handayani, RizqyKusuma Lestari. 2017. Children Confidence Development by Theme Based Movement and Singing Method at RA Islamic Tunas Bangsa 4 Ngaliyan Semarang. Department of Early Childhood Teacher Education, Faculty of Science of Education, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Dewi, P. 2014. Pengembangan Model Integratif Pembelajaran Menulis Berbasis Teks. Semarang: PPS UNNES
Girvan Carina, Claire Conneely, Brendan Tangney. 2015. Extending Experiential Learning in Teacher Professional Development. Centre for Research In IT In Education, School of Education and School Computer Science and Statistics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin: University of Dublin.
Gitome, Joshepin, Michael, Katola & Nyabwari. 2013. Correlation between Student Discipline and Performance in The Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education. International journal of Education and Research 1(8): 23-25.
Hindarto, Nathan, Khoirul Anwar. 2007. Pengaruh Kemahiran Berproses Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SMA melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif. FMIPA UNNES 36(1): 68-73.
Hindarto H. 2015. Readiness of Elementary School Teachers in Implementing Characters Integrated Learning in The Science Subject. Science Education. Semarang: Postgraduate Program Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Pane, Murty Magda & Rina Patriana. 2016. The Significance of Environmental Contens in Character Education for Quality of Life. Journal of Procedia Social and Behavioral Science.
Rusilowati, A. 2013. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Metode Discovery Learning untuk Pemahaman Sains pada Anak TK B. Journal of Primary Education , 2(2): 71-76.
Nuvitalia Duwi, Siti Patonaha, Ernawati Saptaningruma, Khumaedi, Ani Rusilowati. 2016. The Development of Teaching Aid in The Implementation of Natural Science in The Curriculum 2013 Junior School.
Sugiyono. 2008. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugiyono. 2012. Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta
Syaifudin Achmad, Fathur Rokhman, Ida Zulaeha. 2017. Pengembangan Strategi Pembelajaran Tematik Integratif pada Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar. Fakultas Bahasa fan Seni, Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Vescio Vicki, Dorene Ross, Alyson Adams. 2008. A Review of Research on The Impact of Professional Learning Communities on Teaching Practice snd Student Learning. School of Teaching snd Learning, University of Florida, 2403 Norman Hall, P.O. Box 117048, Gainesville, FL 32611-7048, USA.
- Abstract viewed - 241 times
- pdf downloaded - 194 times
Affiliations
Perdana Wira Saputra
Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Ani Rusilowati
Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Sarwi Sarwi
Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
How to Cite
The Effectiveness of Karisma Instructional Model in Fostering The Characters and Increasing Students’ Learning Outcomes of 4th Gradeelementary School Students
Vol 7 No 1 (2018): April 2018
Submitted: Jan 26, 2018
Published: Feb 20, 2018
Abstract
Educational problems require an innovative learning system and research to solve the problems. Research with learning model is line of way to improve the quality of education. The objectives of the research are to describe the way of implementing Karisma learning model, to know the difference of character improvement and learning outcomes, and to know the problems that occurred when implementing the Karisma learning model in Elementary School. Type of research which was used in the research was experiment, while the data analysis technique which was used was two way variant (two way anava) The result of research of the significance of students’ character improvement for factor of student attitude learning model is 0,026 <0,05, or Ftable = 3,027 and Fcount = 3,683. Students’ learning outcomes generally improved with the average of SD LB score 88, SD MR score 74. SD SM scores 82, and SD DD score 78. The results of study by using Karisma learning modelare better, that is 83.29, compared with conventional model which is only scored 74.76. Response data shows that students feel active and do discussion with score of 83.2%. Based on the data analys, schools that implement the Karisma learning model have more positive impact when it is implemented.