Alghifari, E. S. (2014). Pengaruh Risiko Sistematis terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan dan Implikasinya pada Nilai Perusahaan (Studi pada Perusahaan Food and Beverage di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2007-2011). Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen dan Bisnis, 5(1), 1-16.
Banks, E. (2004). Corporate Governance: Financial Responsibility, Controls and Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: a Review and Typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991-1013.
Davis, G. F. (1996). The Significance of Board Interlocks for Corporate Governance. Scholarly Research and Theory Papers, 4(3), 154-159.
De, B. (2003). The Incidence and Performance Effects of Interlocking Directorates in Emerging Market Business Groups: Evidence from India. Research Paper in Economics.
Ghozali, Imam & Ratmono, D. (2013). No Title. FEB Universitas Diponegoro.
Gustina, D. L., & Wijayanto, A. (2015). Analisis Rasio Keuangan dalam Memprediksi Perubahan Laba. Management Analysis Journal, 4(2), 120-128.
Hamdan, A. (2018). Board Interlocking and Firm Performance : the Role of Foreign Ownership in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Managerial Finance.
Haryanto, S. (2014). Identifikasi Ekspektasi Investor Melalui Kebijakan Struktur Modal, Profitabilitas, Ukuran Perusahaan dan GCPI. Mamika Manajemen, 5(2), 183-199.
Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2003). Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: a Survey of the Economic Literature, (April), 7-26.
Jensen, & Meckling. (1976). Theory of the Firm : Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
Kaczmarek, S., Kimino, S., & Pye, A. (2012). Interlocking Directorships and Firm Performance in Highly Regulated Sectors : the Moderating Impact of Board Diversity. Journal of Management & Governance.
Keuangan, otoritas jasa. (n.d.). Roadmap Tata Kelola Perusahaan Indonesia.
Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Republik Indonesia. (2009). Perkom KPPU Nomor 07 Tahun 2009 tentang Pedoman Jabatan Rangkap Sesuai Ketentuan Pasal 26 UU No 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.
Lamb, N. H. (2017). Does the Number of Interlocking Directors Influence a Firm’s Financial Performance? an Exploratory Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Management Vol., 17(1998), 47-57.
Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What Do Interlock Do ? an Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates. Annual Reviewing of Sociology, 22(271).
Muliawati, S., & Khoiruddin, M. (2015). Faktor-Faktor Penentu Profitabilitas Bank Syariah di Indonesia. Management Analysis Journal, 3(2), 1-6.
Nam, H. J., & An, Y. (2018). The Effect of Interlocking Directors Network on Firm Value and Performance: Evidence from Korean-Listed Firms. Global Economic Review, 47(2), 151-173.
Non, Marielle C & Franses, P. H. (2007). Interlocking Boards and Firm Performance : Evidence from a New Panel Database. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper.
Nugraha, A. A. (2013). Analisis Pengaruh Struktur Modal terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan yang Tergabung dalam Indeks Kompas 100. Management Analysis Journal, 2(1), 1-7.
Pombo, C., & Gutiérrez, L. H. (2011). Journal of Economics and Business Outside Directors, Board Interlocks and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Colombian Business Groups. Journal of Economics and Business, 63(4), 251-277.
Prihandoko, N. D. (2018). Pengaruh Rangkap Jabatan (Interlocking Directorate) dan Proporsi Dewan Komisaris Independen terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan dan Kinerja Pasar pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Stieykpn.
Rahmawati, D. &, & Khoiruddin, M. (2017). Pengaruh Corporate Governance dan Kinerja Keuangan Dalam Memprediksi Kondisi Financial Distress. Management Analysis Journal, 6(1).
Ridhloah, S. (2010). Faktor Penentu Struktur Modal: Studi Empirik pada Perusahaan Multifinansial. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen, 1(2), 144-153.
Ross, A. (1973). The Economic the Theory of Agency: Principal’s Problem. Decision Making Under UncertaintyY, 63 No. 2.
Roudaki, J., & Bhuiyan, M. B. U. (2015). Interlocking Directorship in New Zealand Interlocking Directorship in New Zealand. Australasian Accounting, Bussiness and Finance Journal, 9(3), 45-58.
Safitri &Yulianto, R. D. S. & A. (2015). Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan terhadap Return Total Saham pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Management Analysis Journal, 4(1).
Saidin, N., Malek, M., & Saidin, S. F. (2013). The Impact of Interlocking Directorates on Corporate Performance of Bursa Malaysia Listed Companies. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, (September 2015).
Seftianne, & Handayani, R. (2011). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Struktur Modal pada Perusahaan Publik Sektor Manufaktur. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, Volume 13(1), Hlm 39-56.
Shropshire, C. (2010). The Role of The Interlocking Director and Board Receptivity in The Diffusion of Practices. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 246-264.
Wardoyo & Veronica, T. M. (2013). Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility & Kinerja Keuangan terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen, 4(2), 132-149.
Wijayanto, A. (2010). Analisis Pengaruh ROA, EPS, Financial Leverage, Proceed Terhadap Initial Return. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen, 1(1), 68-78.
Yulianto, A. (2013). Keputusan Struktur Modal dan Kebijakan Deviden sebagai Mekanisme Mengurangi Masalah Keagenan. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen, 4(2), 161-179. Yulianto, A., Suhadak, Darminto, & Handayani, siti ragil. (2014). The Role of Corporate Governance, Dividend Policy, and Capital Structure on Ownership Structure toward the Firm Value. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(8), 134-141.
Yulianto, A., Witiastuti, R. S., & Ardiansari, A. (2018). Trade-off or Pecking Order Theory in Indonesia. Eouropean Journal of Business and Management, 10(30), 2010-2012.
- Abstract viewed - 533 times
- pdf downloaded - 431 times
Affiliations
Meilinda Brielyan Pertiwi
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Arief Yulianto
Universitas Negeri Semarang
How to Cite
Board Interlocking and Firm Performance: Evidence from Indonesia
Vol 9 No 1 (2020): Management Analysis Journal
Submitted: Oct 7, 2019
Published: Mar 24, 2020
Abstract
This study aims to determine the relationships of board interlocking and firm performance as measured by Return on Assets (ROA). This research method uses a quantitative approach with research objects of all companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2008-2017. The sample selection method uses a purposive sampling. The sample used was 4450 observation. Data analysis methods used are descriptive analysis and dummy variable regression Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). The result showed that the average performance of companies that do interlock of directors at other companies at the same time is higher than companies that do not do interlock. The existence of a director who has do interlock allows directors to get access in other places and can mutually utilize resource supported by empirical result where the total assets of companies that do interlock higher than companies that did not interlock. Although concurrent positions can improve the company, the company still complies with government regulations so that the company does not get the law and get sanctionse.