https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/litera/article/view/1318
Arief, N. (2015). Tindak Tutur Guru dalam Wacana Kelas. Malang: Worldwide Readers.
Ariyanti, L. D., & Zulaeha, I. (2017). Tindak Tutur Ekspresif Humanis dalam Interaksi Pembelajaran di SMA Negeri 1 Batang: Analisis Wacana Kelas. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(2), 111-122. Retrieved from
https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/seloka/article/view/17272
Behnam, B. & Yassamin P. (2009). Classroom Discourse: Analyzing Teacher/Learner Interactions in Iranian EFL Task Based Classrooms. Porta Linguarum, 12, 117-132. Retrieved from
http://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/31875
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Universal in Language Use: Politeness Phenomena (Ed.) Question and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Domalewska. D. (2015). Classroom Discourse Analysis in EFL Elementary Lessons. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 1(1), 6-9. Retrieved from
http://www.ijlll.org/vol1/2-X00052.pdf
Duhita, A. A., & Zulaeha, I. (2018). The Politeness Speech of Primary School Teacher in the Character Building of Learners. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 7(2), 112-121. Retrieved from
https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/seloka/article/view/25182
Eemeran, F. H., Petter, H., & A. Francisca S. H. (2007). Argumentatif Indikators in Discourse (A Pragma-Dialectical Study). Neteherlands: Springer
Eliya, I., & Zulaeha, I. (2018). Pola Komunikasi Politik Ganjar Pranowo dalam Perspektif Sosiolinguistik di Media Sosial Instagram. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(3), 286-296. Retrieved from
https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/seloka/article/view/16044
Fahmi, R. N., & Rustono. (2018). Types of Speech Acts in Indonesian Debate Argumentative Discourse. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 7(1), 28-37. Retrieved from
https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/seloka/article/view/22941
Ford, C. E. (1993). Grammar in Interaction: Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fried, L. (2011). Teaching Teachers about Emotion Regulation in the Classroom. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 117-127. Retrieved from
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ920029.pdf
Gallas, K. (1995). Talking Their Way Into Science: Hearing Children's Questions and Theories, Responding with Curricula. New York: Teachers College Press.
Husin, K. (1995). Dinamika Sekolah dan Bilik Darjah. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication & Distribution.
Ibrahim, A. S. (1992). Kajian Tindak Tutur. Surabaya: Penerbit Usaha Nasional.
Johnson, C. E. (1980). Answer to Some Basic Question about Teacher Competencies and Competency – Based Education. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
Katz, A. & Paul, P. (1974). Development of A Sosial Distance Scale. Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. San Diego, California. pp. 1-18. Retrieved from
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/780439.pdf
Masfufah, N. (2010). Kesantunan Bentuk Tuturan Direktif di Lingkungan SMA Negeri 1 Surakaarta (Sebuah Kajian Sosiopragmatik). Thesis. Surakarta: Program Pascasarjana UNS. Retrieved from
https://digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/download/13403/MjgwNjQ=/Kesantunan-bentuk-tuturan-direktif-di-lingkungan-SMA-Negeri-1-Surakarta-abstrak.pdf
Mulyani, M. (2010). Pengoptimalan Kompetensi Mahasiswa Jurusan Bahasa dan sastra Indonesia FBS Unnes dalam Membuat Media Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Menggunakan Elemen Authentic. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 27(2), 1-12. Retrieved from
https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/JPP/article/view/172
Nunan, D. (1989). Understanding language classroom. Cambridge: Prentice Hall.
Nurhayati. (2010). Wacana Interaksi Kelas: Analisis Kritis Aspek dari Dimensi Sosial. Publikasi Ilmiah, pp.1-12. Retrieved from
http://eprints.unsri.ac.id/427
Ormrod, J. E. (2009). Psikologi Pendidikan: Membantu Siswa Tumbuh dan Berkembang. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Purbani, W. (2015). Analisis Wacana. Makalah Penelitian. Lokakarya Penelitian di UBAYA, Surabaya. Retrieved from
http://staffnew.uny.ac.id/upload/131874171/pengabdian/discourse-analysis.pdf
Ruhimat, M. P. T. (2012). Prosedur Pembelajaran. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Retrieved from
http://file.upi.edu/direktori/fip/jur._kurikulum_dan_tek._pendidikan/195711211985031-toto_ruhimat/prosedur_pembelajaran_di_sd.pdf
Rusminto, N. E. (2010). Analisis Wacana; Kajian Teoritis dan Praktis. Bandar Lampung. Universitas Lampung.
Rymes, B. (2016). ClassroomDiscourse Analysis A Tool for Critical Reflection. New York: Routledge.
Sanjaya, W. (2008). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Macanan Jaya Cemerlang.
Sardiman. (2016). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Setiawan, T. (2014). Wacana Bahasa Indonesia. Tangerang: Universitas Terbuka.
Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse Analysis, The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Oxford: Basil Balckwell.
Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press,
Suparlan. (2006). Guru sebagai Profesi. Yogyakarta: Hikaya.
Untoro, R. D. (2010). Analisis Wacana Lisan Interaksi Guru dan Siswa di Kelas (Studi Kasus Pemakaian Bahasa di SMA Negeri 3 Sragen dalam Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia, Biologi, dan Sosiologi). Thesis. Surakarta: Pascasarjana UNS. Retrieved from
https://digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/download/14037/Mjg3NzQ=/Analisis-wacana-lisan-interaksi-guru-dan-siswa-di-kelas-studi-kasus-pemakaian-bahasa-di-SMA-Negeri-3-Sragen-dalam-mata-pelajaran-Bahasa-Indonesia-Biologi-dan-Sosiologi-abstrak.pdf
Veysi, E. (2015). The Communicative Function of Intonation Processing in English and Persian-Perception of Implicit Directive Messages. International Journal of English Language and Translation Studies, 3(3), 73-85. Retrieved from
http://www.eltsjournal.org/archive/value3%20issue3/8-3-3-15.pdf
Yule, G. (2006). Pragmatics. Translate by Indah Fajar W. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Yuliarti, Y., Rustono, & Nuryatin, A. (2015). Tindak Tutur Direktif dalam Wacana Novel Trilogi Karya Agustinus Wibowo. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 4(2), 78-85. Retrieved from
https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/seloka/article/view/9864
- Abstract viewed - 2066 times
- pdf downloaded - 7005 times
Affiliations
R. Iguh Prasetyo
Public Senior High School 1 Wirosari, Grobogan, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
Mimi Mulyani
Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
How to Cite
Teacher’s Directives Speech Acts in Teaching-Learning Interactions: Classroom Discourse Analysis
Vol 7 No 3 (2018): December 2018
Submitted: Oct 12, 2018
Published: Oct 12, 2018
Abstract
Students' responses to the teacher's directive speech act are often not in line with expectations becaused they do not pay attention to the social context, interactional context and individual agency. The objectives of this research are: to describe the social context dimensions, the interactional context dimensions, and the individual agency onteacher’s directive speech act in teaching – learning interactions. This research uses a qualitative description approach and theoretical approach to classroom discourse analysis (Rymes). There is a variety of social distance (familiarity), teacher's high social status, interaction formalities situation, and the dominance of affective and referential functions in teacher's directive speech acts. Teacher's directive speech acts bring predictable, unpredictable interactivity, and create new contexts. Teacher's directive speech acts can showability master in subject matter, the ability to delivery subject matter, and ability tointeraction. The results of this research can be used as a reference in linguistic research and interaction in teaching and learning activities.