Ariyanti, L. D, & Zulaeha, I. (2017). Tindak Tutur Ekspresif Humanis dalam Interaksi Pembelajaran di SMA Negeri 1 Batang: Analisis Wacana Kelas. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(2), 111-122. Retrieved from
https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/seloka/article/view/17272
Arum, D. P. (2015). Struktur Konversasi Wacana Debat dalam Indonesia Lawyers Club. Jurnal Pena Indonesia, 1(2), 188-215. Retrieved from
https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jpi/article/view/700
Astuti, S. P. (2018). Tegur Sapa Penjual dan Pembeli di Pasar Tradisional Surya Kusuma Semarang. Nusa, 13(1), 147-155. Retrieved from
https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/nusa/article/view/18334
Bintana, K., Rukmini, D., & Sofwan, A. (2018) The Adjacency Pairs Patterns of Trumps’ Victory Interview in ‘60 Minutes’. English Education Journal, 8(1), 18-26. Retrieved from
https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/article/view/22044
Ermawati, Yanti, Y., & Elfiondri. (2016). An Analysis of Adjacency Pairs As Seen in Oprah Winfrey’s Talk Show. Abstract of Undergraduate Research, Faculty of Humanities, Bung Hatta University, 1(2). Retrieved from
http://ejurnal.bunghatta.ac.id/index.php?journal=JFIB&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=6965
Isgiant, L. (2016). The Adjacency Pairs Analysis on ‘Six Minutes English’ Conversation Script of BBC Learning English: A Study of Discourse Analysis. Proceedings. Prasasti III, 437-441. Retrieved from
https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosidingprasasti/article/view/1566
Martyawati, A. D. (2014). Pasangan Berdampingan (Adjacency Pairs) dalam Lomba Ngapeh di Kutai Kartanegara. Proceedings. Prasasti I, 9-12. Retrieved from
https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosidingprasasti/article/view/436
Mudra, H. (2018). Adjacency Pairs as Uttered in The Conversations of Sofia Coppola’s Lost in Translation Movie Script. Humanus: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-ilmu Humaniora, 17(1), 126-137. Retrieved from
http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/humanus/article/view/8050
Permatasari, I. (2017). Adjacency Pairs in Drama Script “Teen Angel†by D.M. Larson. Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies, 4(2), 13-20. Retrieved from
http://garuda.ristekdikti.go.id/journal/article/579535
Purwoko, H. (2008). Discourse Analysis : Kajian Wacana Bagi Semua Orang. Jakarta: Indeks.
Rustono. (1999). Pokok-Pokok Pragmatik. Semarang: IKIP Press.
Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Sanata Darma University Press.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan-Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Yule, G. (2014). Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Yusandra, T. F. (2017). Struktur Percakapan dalam Teks Drama Anggun Nan Tongga Karya Wisran Hadi. Jurnal Kata, 1(2), 117-130. Retrieved from
http://ejournal.kopertis10.or.id/index.php/kata/article/view/2112
Zulaeha, I. (2016). Teori, Model, dan Implementasi: Pembelajaran Menulis Kreatif. Semarang: UNNES Press.
- Abstract viewed - 655 times
- pdf downloaded - 5633 times
Affiliations
Wiwin Widiyastuti
Public Senior High School 1 Karanganyar, Demak, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
Rustono Rustono
Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
How to Cite
Adjacency Pair of Conversation on Interactional Discourse in High School Learning
Vol 7 No 3 (2018): December 2018
Submitted: Jan 28, 2019
Published: Dec 31, 2018
Abstract
In interactional discourse, the learning between teacher and students is preferably the delivery of intentions to the interlocutor. There are often implicit intentions in these interactions. The objective of this study is to describe the adjacency pair in the conversations of teacher and students in interactional discourse in high school learning. Data were collected by observation method with uninvolved conversation observation technique. Data analysis was conducted by using pragmatic methods with heuristic techniques. Based on research studies, it shows that eleven adjacency pair, including interlocutor of greeting, call-answer, complaint-aid, complaint-apologies, request-allow, request-giving information, request-offer, request-acceptance, assignment-approval, offer-acceptance, and proposal-acceptance. Practically, the research results are useful as input to teachers that there are various language characteristics of high school students that must be considered.