Function of Non-Judge Mediators in Divorce Settlement Through Religious Courts
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Marriage is carried out until the death of one of the husband and wife. In certain conditions, some things require the dissolution of a marriage, meaning that if the marriage relationship continues, harm will occur which will lead to divorce. Mediation as an out-of-court dispute resolution process is used by courts as a divorce settlement process. Mediation is carried out by a mediator, both a judge mediator and a non-judge mediator. The problem discussed is how to resolve divorce cases through mediation by non-judge mediators in the Religious Courts. The research method used is empirical research with qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis is a study related to the integration of the substance of laws and regulations on divorce mediation and resolution in Religious Courts. Based on the results of research, the mediation process in the Religious Courts must be carried out by PERMA Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts, in line with islah as a peacemaker in Islam which has been carried out in the Religious Courts by mediator judges and non-judge mediators. The results of the study show that the success rate is very low. The cause of the failure of divorce settlement through mediation in the Religious Courts is the parties have the intention to divorce, making mediation only a requirement. In addition, the effectiveness of the mediator's function comes from the mediator's skills in handling divorce cases and the awareness of the parties to improve the household and the need for laws on mediation.
Article Details
References
Anam, Khoirul. “Strategi Hakim Mediator Dalam Mencegah Terjadinya Perceraian.” Jurnal Hukum - Yustitiabelen 7, no. 1 (2021): 115–27. https://journal.unita.ac.id/index.php/yustitia/article/download/323/299.
Asyhadi, Farhan. “Efektivitas Mediasi Dalam Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Karawang.” Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 1 (2019): 32–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36805/jjih.v4i1.642.
Azzahro, Mifta Zulfalah. “Faktor Penghambat Mediator Non-Hakim Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Pada Kasus Lanjut Usia.” El-Faqih: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Hukum Islam 9, no. 1 (2023): 39–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58401/faqih.v9i1.863.
Hadad, Al-Thahir Al, and M. Adib Bisri. Wanita Dalam Syariat Dan Masyarakat. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 1993.
Hanifah, Mardalena. “Kajian Yuridis : Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Di Pengadilan.” ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata 2, no. 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v2i1.21.
Harahap, M. Yahya. Kedudukan Kewenangan Dan Acara Peradilan Agama UU No. 7 Th. 1989. Jakarta: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Hariyanto, Erie, Moh. Efendi, and Sulistiyawati. “Dilema Hakim Pengadilan Agama Dalam Menyelesaikan Perkara Hukum Keluarga Melalui Mediasi.” Volksgeist 4, no. 1 (2021): 115–24. https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/volksgeist/article/view/4333/2436.
Hariyanto, Erie, and Moh. Efendi Sulistiyawati. “Dilema Hakim Pengadilan Agama Dalam Menyelesaikan Perkara Hukum Keluarga Melalui Mediasi.” Volksgeist 4, no. 1 (2021): 115–24. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v3i1.4333.
Hartawati, Andi, Sumiati Beddu, and Elvi Susanti. “Model Mediasi Dalam Meningkatkan Keberhasilan Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama.” Indonesia Journal of Criminal Law 4, no. 1 (2022): 59–73. https://journal.ilininstitute.com/index.php/IJoCL/article/view/1551/550.
Hasanah, Faridatul. “Pendekatan Persuasif Mediator Dalam Praktik Mediasi Kasus Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Gresik.” Shakhsiyah Burhaniyah: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Islam 6, no. 1 (2021): 25–48. https://ejournal.unhasy.ac.id/index.php/ShakhsiyahBurhaniyah/article/download/1639/1164.
Hidayat, Masykur. “Keberadaan Lembaga Perdamaian (Dading) Setelah Berlakunya Perma No. 2 Tahun 2003 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi Di Pengadilan.” Airlangga University, 2005. https://repository.unair.ac.id/35921/.
Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum Perdata Indonesia. 5th ed. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014. https://simpus.mkri.id/opac/detail-opac?id=9981.
Mutholib, Liky Faizal, and H. Muhammad Zaki. “Analisis Hukum Islam Terhadap Pelaksanaan Mediasi Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Gedong Tatan Dan Pengadilan Agama Pringsewu Lampung.” Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 4, no. 2 (2022): 83–92. http://repository.radenintan.ac.id/20384/.
Prodjohamidjojo, Martiman. Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia. 3rd ed. Jakarta: Indonesia Legal Center Publishing, 2011.
Saifullah, Muhammad. Mediasi Dalam Tinjauan Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif Di Indonesia. Semarang: Walisongo Press, 2009.
Saraswati, Rika, V Hadiyono, Yuni Kusniati, and Emanuel Boputra. “Peranan Mediator Hakim Dan Mediator Non Hakim Melindungi Hak-Hak Anak Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perceraian.” Jurnal Hukum Justitia Et Pax 36, no. 2 (2020): 159–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v36i2.3164.
Sari, Septi Wulan. “Mediasi Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016.” AHKAM 5, no. 1 (2017): 1–16. https://ejournal.uinsatu.ac.id/index.php/ahkam/article/view/669/480.
Sosroatmodjo, Arso, and Wasit Aulawi. Hukum Perkawinan Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1998.
Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. “Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Concerning Mediation Procedures in Court (Perma No. 1 of 2016).” Jakarta, 2016. https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/legal-product/perma-nomor-1-tahun-2016/detail.
Widjaja, Gunawan. Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2005. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=569165.
Wignjosoebroto, Soetandyo. Hukum : Paradigma Metode Dan Dinamika Masalahnya. 1st ed. Jakarta: Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi Masyarakat (ELSAM), 2002.