Evaluating Learning Management System Adoption Effectiveness for Educators and Students in Batam Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/edukom.v12i2.37063Keywords:
Learning Management System, Information Communication Technology, TPACKAbstract
The rapid expansion of digital technology and online platforms is reshaping higher education, driving widespread adoption of Learning Management Systems (LMS) and synchronous ICT tools for teaching and learning. As institutions increasingly rely on these technologies, it is essential to understand their effectiveness in supporting educational transformation rather than simply digitizing traditional practices. This study investigates the perceived integration and impact of LMS and ICT tools among students and educators across six universities, using the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework. A quantitative survey of 579 respondents assessed seven TPACK domains with reliable measurement instruments. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, correlation, and regression analyses were employed to compare perspectives and identify key predictors of successful technology integration. Results reveal that both groups express positive views of LMS and ICT, with all TPACK constructs rated above 3.8. Educators report higher self-assessed competencies, particularly in technological and pedagogical domains, although the differences are statistically significant but practically minor. Strong correlations among TPACK factors and regression modeling highlight Technological Pedagogical Knowledge and Technological Content Knowledge as the most important predictors of effective integration, underscoring the importance of system supported pedagogical design and content delivery rather than simple content digitization. Despite robust infrastructure and readiness, the findings suggest that LMS and ICT are primarily used to support rather than truly transform learning experiences. The study contributes to educational information systems literature by providing empirical evidence on user perceptions and the need for a system design strategies to achieve more innovative, student centric, technology‑enhanced education in Batam.
References
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102(June 2019), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
Al-Mamary, Y. H. S., Siddiqui, M. A., Abdalraheem, S. G., Jazim, F., Abdulrab, M., Rashed, R. Q., Alquhaif, A. S., & Aliyu Alhaji, A. (2024). Factors impacting Saudi students’ intention to adopt learning management systems using the TPB and UTAUT integrated model. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 15(5), 1110–1141. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-04-2022-0068
Alqahtani, A. Y., & Rajkhan, A. A. (2020). E-learning critical success factors during the covid-19 pandemic: A comprehensive analysis of e-learning managerial perspectives. Education Sciences, 10(9), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090216
Awang, N. E., Hamzah, M. I., & Zulkifli, H. (2025). Barriers to Implementing Innovative Pedagogy: A Systematic Review of Challenges and Strategic Solutions. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(3), 679–698. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.3.32
Ayubi, M. N., & Retnowardhani, A. (2025). Optimizing Learning Experiences: A Study of Student Satisfaction with LMS in Higher Education. APTISI Transactions on Technopreneurship, 7(2), 527–541. https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v7i2.501
Brown, S., Murphy, L., & Hammond, K. (2020). Learning Management System Adoption by Academics: A Perspective Following the Forced Lockdown of NZ Universities due to COVID-19 in 2020. Journal of Open, 25(2), 55–65. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1342579.pdf
Chai, C. S., Jong, M., & Yan, Z. (2020). Surveying Chinese teachers’ technological pedagogical STEM knowledge: A pilot validation of STEM-TPACK survey. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 14(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2020.106181
Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Fantiro, F. A., Muzakki, A., Prakoso, B. B., Saputra, S. Y., & Putri, A. D. C. (2025). Enhancing student engagement in sports learning: The role of e- modules, teacher creativity, and technology. Jurnal SPORTIF : Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran, 11(2), 258–274.
Fibriasari, H., Andayani, W., Putri, T. T. A., & Harianja, N. (2023). Learning Management System Now and in The Future: Study Case from the Indonesian University Students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(1), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.1.1791
Heru Wijayanto Aripradono, Surya Tjahyadi, & Winson Kennedy. (2025). Student Satisfaction and Continuance Intention of E-learning System: University Student Perspective. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Open Source, 8(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.36378/jtos.v8i1.3954
Htet, A., Liana, S. R., Aung, T., & Bhaumik, A. (2023). Impact of Learning Management System on Learning Process in Myanmar: Student Perspective. Journal of Engineering Education and Pedagogy, 1(2), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.56855/jeep.v1i2.686
Huq Shamim, M. R., Jeng, A. M., & Raihan, M. A. (2024). University teachers’ perceptions of ICT-based teaching to construct knowledge for effective classroom interaction in the context of TPACK model. Heliyon, 10(8), e28577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28577
Jiménez Sierra, Á. A., Ortega Iglesias, J. M., Cabero-Almenara, J., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2023). Development of the teacher’s technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) from the Lesson Study: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8(February). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1078913
Kant, N., Prasad, K. D., & Anjali, K. (2021). Selecting an appropriate learning management system in open and distance learning: a strategic approach. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 16(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-09-2020-0075
Khoiriyah, K., Sholahuddin, M. F. T., & Bintang, A. B. D. (2024). Factors contributing to students’ satisfaction in online learning: A proposed framework for CLIL classes. English Learning Innovation, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.22219/englie.v6i1.37256
Khoza, S. B., & Mpungose, C. B. (2022). Digitalised curriculum to the rescue of a higher education institution. African Identities, 20(4), 310–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2020.1815517
Krassadaki, E., Tsafarakis, S., Kapenis, V., & Matsatsinis, N. (2022). The use of ICT during lockdown in higher education and the effects on university instructors. Heliyon, 8(11), e11214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11214
Li, X., & Zhu, W. (2022). System quality, information quality, satisfaction and acceptance of online learning platform among college students in the context of online learning and blended learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(December), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1054691
Mahyoob, M. (2020). Challenges of e-Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic Experienced by EFL Learners. Arab World English Journal, 11(4), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.23
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610
Morera Quesada, G., Fallas Gabuardi, V., Hernández Vargas, R., Quirós, O. E., & Chaverri, G. (2023). Online or Face-to-Face Learning? College Students’ Perceptions in the Aftermath of the COVID-19 Pandemic. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(3), 124–134. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.3.645
Mulyono, Slamet, S. Y., & Chumdari. (2025). The Effectiveness of Interactive Learning Media in Improving Students’ Understanding of the Food Chain Concept in Elementary Schools. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(6), 340–348. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i6.11099
Nguyen, N. T. (2021). A study on satisfaction of users towards learning management system at International University – Vietnam National University HCMC. Asia Pacific Management Review, 26(4), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.02.001
Rahman, M. J. A., Yasin, M. H. M., Hamzah, M. I., Haron, Z., Daud, M. Y., & Ensimau, N. K. (2020). Teaching and Learning-Assisted Learning Management System. 397(Icliqe 2019), 1007–1012. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200129.124
Reich, J. (2021). Ed tech’s failure during the pandemic, and what comes after. Phi Delta Kappan, 102(6), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721721998149
Richards, K., & Thompson, B. M. W. (2023). Challenges and instructor strategies for transitioning to online learning during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of literature. Frontiers in Communication, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1260421
Ruijuan, L., Srikhoa, S., & Jantharajit, N. (2023). Blending of collaborative and active learning instructional methods to improve academic performance and self-motivation of vocational students. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 9(4), 130–135. https://doi.org/10.20448/edu.v9i4.5211
Selvanathan, M., Hussin, N. A. M., & Azazi, N. A. N. (2023). Students learning experiences during COVID-19: Work from home period in Malaysian Higher Learning Institutions. Teaching Public Administration, 41(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420977900
Simon, P. D., Jiang, J., Fryer, L. K., King, R. B., & Frondozo, C. E. (2024). An Assessment of Learning Management System Use in Higher Education: Perspectives from a Comprehensive Sample of Teachers and Students. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09734-5
Suwarno, S. (2022). Application of the UTAUT Model for Acceptance Analysis of COBIT Implementation in E-Learning Management with Microsoft Teams on Distance Learning in Batam City. Khazanah Informatika : Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Dan Informatika, 8(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.23917/khif.v8i1.15311
Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2022). An Overview of the Common Elements of Learning Management System Policies in Higher Education Institutions. TechTrends, 855–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00752-7
