Multimodal Learning Interaction in Multimedia Laboratory Environments: An Empirical Framework for Infrastructure Development

Authors

  • Jarir Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika Author
  • Akbar Juliansyah Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika Author
  • Fitri Ramdani Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika Author
  • Wirawan Putrayadi Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika Author
  • Edy Haryanto Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/edukom.v13i1.50379

Keywords:

Educational Technology, Laboratory Learning Effectiveness, Multimedia Laboratory, Multimedia Laboratory Infrastructure, Multimodal Learning Interaction

Abstract

Multimedia-supported laboratory environments play an important role in enhancing learning engagement, conceptual understanding, and practical competence in higher education. However, limited empirical evidence exists regarding the relative contributions of the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic interaction dimensions to laboratory learning effectiveness. This study aimed to develop an empirical multimodal interaction framework for multimedia laboratory infrastructure development by examining the influence of these three dimensions on perceived learning effectiveness. A mixed-methods sequential explanatory design was employed. Quantitative data were collected from 101 university students enrolled in PTI Practicum, PTI Non-Practicum, and BK courses. Multiple regression analysis was conducted using responses from 58 students with direct laboratory practicum experience. Qualitative support was obtained through expert validation involving 14 lecturers. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test, multiple linear regression, and expert triangulation. The descriptive analysis revealed that the kinesthetic dimension had the highest mean score, indicating a stronger preference for hands-on and experiential learning activities. However, the regression analysis demonstrated that the auditory dimension made the strongest contribution to perceived laboratory learning effectiveness, followed by the visual and kinesthetic dimensions. The regression model explained 64.8% of the variance in perceived learning effectiveness, indicating substantial explanatory power. The standardized regression coefficients were subsequently normalized and translated into infrastructure development priorities, forming the basis of the proposed empirical framework. Lecturer validation further emphasized the importance of experiential learning and practical engagement in laboratory environments, while highlighting the complementary roles of instructional communication and multimedia support in enhancing learning effectiveness. These findings suggest that effective multimedia laboratory environments should integrate instructional communication, multimedia visualization, and experiential learning facilities in a balanced manner, recognizing their complementary roles within a multimodal learning ecosystem. This study contributes an empirical framework to support adaptive multimedia laboratory infrastructure development and instructional design in higher education. In practice, the proposed framework may assist laboratory managers and higher education institutions in prioritizing instructional communication, multimedia visualization, and experiential learning facilities according to empirically identified learning interaction needs.

References

Abu-Issa, A., Butmeh, H., & Tumar, I. (2024). Modeling students’ preferences and knowledge for improving educational achievements. Frontiers in Computer Science, 6, 1359770. https://doi.org/10.3389/FCOMP.2024.1359770/TEXT

Adeyele, V. O. (2024). Relative effectiveness of simulation games, blended learning, and interactive multimedia in basic science achievement of varying ability pupils. Education and Information Technologies 2024 29:11, 29(11), 14451–14470. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-023-12414-Z

Chaw, L. Y., & Tang, C. M. (2023). Learner Characteristics and Learners’ Inclination towards Particular Learning Environments. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 21(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.34190/EJEL.21.1.2537

Gangadharan, S., Al Mezeini, K., Gnanamuthu, S. S., & Al Marshoudi, K. A. (2025). The Relationship Between Preferred Learning Styles and Academic Achievement of Undergraduate Health Sciences Students Compared to Other Disciplines at a Middle Eastern University Utilizing the VARK Instrument. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 16, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S491487

Heliawati, L., Lidiawati, L., & Pursitasari, I. D. (2022). Articulate Storyline 3 multimedia based on gamification to improve critical thinking skills and self-regulated learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11(3), 1435–1444. https://doi.org/10.11591/IJERE.V11I3.22168

Hmedna, B., Bakki, A., Mezouary, A. El, & Baz, O. (2023). Unlocking teachers’ potential: MOOCLS, a visualization tool for enhancing MOOC teaching. Smart Learning Environments 2023 10:1, 10(1), 58-. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40561-023-00277-3

Indriati, L., Mai, N., & Yeen-Ju, H. T. (2024). Enhancing Authentic Assessment in Large-Class Design Education Through Authentic Project-Based Learning. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(9), 432–452. https://doi.org/10.26803/IJLTER.23.9.22

Jacobs, A., Pan, Y.-C., & Ho, Y.-C. (2024). Exploring the Effectiveness of Bite-Sized Learning for Statistics via TikTok. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education / Revue Internationale Du e-Learning et La Formation à Distance, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.55667/10.55667/IJEDE.2024.V39.I2.1334

Mahmudah, M., Mahliatussikah, H., Solehudin, M., Masnun, & Batrisya, N. A. (2026). A Multimodal Instructional Design Model: Integrating Infographics and Interactive Videos in Arabic Language Learning. International Journal of Arabic Language Teaching, 8(01), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.32332/IJALT.V8I01.11671

Mayer, R. E. (2024). The Past, Present, and Future of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychology Review 2024 36:1, 36(1), 8-. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10648-023-09842-1

Memon, Mumtaz Ali, Hiram Ting, Jun‐Hwa Cheah, T. Ramayah, Francis Chuah, dan Tat‐Huei Cham. 2020. “Sample Size for Survey Research: Review and Recommendations.” Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling 4 (2). https://doi.org/10.47263/jasem.4(2)01.

Patanduk, S. T., Rachel, Sirande, N., Sirande, N., & Julian, T. (2023). A Need Analysis on Media in Teaching English to Young Learners: Exploring Appropriateness and Advantages. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 9(2), 952–961. https://doi.org/10.30605/ONOMA.V9I2.2759

Revano, T. F., Juanatas, R. A., & Alcober, G. M. I. (2024). Exploring the Efficacy of Multimedia Technology in Fostering Technology-Enabled Learning and Teaching: Bridging Educational Gaps. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1145/3678726.3678728;ISSUE:ISSUE:DOI

Ristić, I., Runić-Ristić, M., Savić Tot, T., Tot, V., & Bajac, M. (2023). The Effects and Effectiveness of An Adaptive E-Learning System on The Learning Process and Performance of Students. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 11(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2023-11-1-77-92

Seery, M. K., Agustian, H. Y., Christiansen, F. V., Gammelgaard, B., & Malm, R. H. (2024). 10 Guiding principles for learning in the laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 25(2), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RP00245D

Septiani, D., Lestari, T., & Azizah, D. M. (2024). Analysis of Learning Style Profiles to Optimize Student Achievement. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 19(6), 959–963. https://doi.org/10.29303/JPM.V19I6.7613

Sinrang, N. (2025). Multimodal Meaning Making and Language Learning in Digital Multilingual Environments. LIER: Language Inquiry & Exploration Review, 2(2), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.71435/688502

Srikasem, S., Seephom, S., Viriyopase, A., Phutrakool, P., Khowinthaseth, S., Narajeenron, K., Thanomlikhit, C., Chavanovanich, J., Ritsamdang, J., Dhanakoses, K., Potisartra, K., Bunditanukul, K., Kongruttanachok, N., Chanchaochai, N., Tanjapatkul, N., Worasilchai, N., Chaimongkol, N., Kheawwan, P., Sunpawut, P., … Kotrajaras, V. (2025). Comparing the Effectiveness of Multimodal Learning Using Computer-Based and Immersive Virtual Reality Simulation–Based Interprofessional Education With Co-Debriefing, Medical Movies, and Massive Online Open Courses for Mitigating Stress and Long-Term Bur…. JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:E70726 Https://Mededu.Jmir.Org/2025/1/E70726, 11(1), e70726. https://doi.org/10.2196/70726

Staneviciene, E., & Žekienė, G. (2025). The Use of Multimedia in the Teaching and Learning Process of Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(19), 8859. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU17198859/S1

Wu, S. (2024). Application of multimedia technology to innovative vocational education on learning satisfaction in China. PLOS ONE, 19(2), e0298861. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0298861

Yaw Obeng, A. (2023). Consequential effects of using competing perspectives to predict learning style in e-learning systems. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2218960

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

Article ID

50379

How to Cite

Jarir, Juliansyah, A., Ramdani, F., Putrayadi, W., & Haryanto, E. (2026). Multimodal Learning Interaction in Multimedia Laboratory Environments: An Empirical Framework for Infrastructure Development. Edu Komputika Journal, 13(1), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.15294/edukom.v13i1.50379