Revolutionizing Indonesia’s Administrative Court: A Bold Push for Fairness and Proportionality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v7i1.18860Keywords:
Indonesia, Administrative Court, Fairness, Proportionality, Judicial ReformAbstract
Indonesia's administrative justice system is at a critical juncture, facing challenges of inefficiency, inconsistency, and limited access to fair legal recourse. This research examines the urgent need for a transformative approach in establishing an Indonesian Administrative Court grounded in the principles of fairness and proportionality. Despite progress in administrative reform, the current system often falls short of delivering just outcomes for citizens, leaving many marginalized and without proper redress. The novel contribution of this study lies in its comprehensive framework for integrating these foundational principles into the court’s design and practice. By analyzing both international best practices and local judicial traditions, the research proposes a set of reforms that would enhance the accessibility, transparency, and responsiveness of the administrative judiciary. The principle of fairness emphasizes equal treatment and impartial decision-making, while proportionality ensures that legal outcomes align with the scale of the issues at hand. Through an in-depth case study of administrative court decisions, this work identifies critical gaps where these principles can be meaningfully implemented. The urgency of these reforms is underscored by the growing demand for public accountability and citizen trust in the judiciary, which is essential for Indonesia’s democratic stability. By offering practical solutions and a conceptual shift, this research provides a timely contribution to the ongoing discourse on judicial reform in Indonesia, with the potential to reshape the administrative court system into a more equitable and effective institution for all citizens.
References
Batu, A. L., & Hayati, T. (2023). Penanganan Bagi Pejabat Pemerintah Yang Tidak Melaksanakan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Unes Law Review, 5(4), 2918–2927. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i4
Elsye, R. (2016). Hukum Tata Usaha Negara.
Fadillah, A. P., Nurhasanah, A. I., Akbar, B. M., Salsabilla, O., Fitri, K., & Korespondensi, E. (n.d.). PERBANDINGAN ADMINISTRASI ANTARA INDONESIA DAN THAILAND.
Fajlurrahman, J. (2021). Buku Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.pdf.
Habibi, D. (2019). Perbandingan Hukum Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dan Verwaltungsgericht Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Rakyat. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 49(2), 320. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no2.2006
Harahap Zarina. (2015). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Edisi Revisi (Issue 5).
Herlambang, P. H. (2019). Keragaman Budaya Dalam Masyarakat. Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev), 2(1), 336–342.
Jiwantara, F. A., & Hasanah, S. (2021). Pelaksanaan Prosedur Eksekusi Putusan Peradilan Administrasi Antara Indonesia Dengan Thailand. Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah, 1(4), 571–585.
Panjaitan, B. S. (2016). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.
Sari, E., & Iskandar, H. (2019). Pengantar HUKUM ACARA TATA USAHA NEGARA. In Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952.
Siallagan, H., Siburian, K., & Z, F. (2014). HUKUM ACARA PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA. In Penambahan Natrium Benzoat Dan Kalium Sorbat (Antiinversi) Dan Kecepatan Pengadukan Sebagai Upaya Penghambatan Reaksi Inversi Pada Nira Tebu.
Herlambang, P. H. (2024). Pengantar Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
18860Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nazla Arliva Rahman, Ratih Damayanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All works published in the Indonesian State Law Review are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). All writings published in this journal are the personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions.