Comparative Study of the Application of the 'Conseil d'État' Concept in State Administrative Courts in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v7i1.18863Keywords:
The State Administrative Court, Conseil d'État, ConceptAbstract
The State Administrative Court (PTUN) in Indonesia plays a crucial role in resolving disputes between individuals or legal entities and state administrative bodies or officials, serving as a protector of justice in the relationship between government and society. Similarly, France's Conseil d'État, established in 1799, serves as the highest administrative judicial body, resolving conflicts between citizens and the government, while also advising the government on legislative matters. This article presents a comparative study of the application of the Conseil d'État concept in the context of Indonesia’s State Administrative Courts. Using a normative juridical research method, the study examines whether the structures, functions, and practices of the Conseil d'État can be adapted to enhance the Indonesian legal system. The research explores key differences and similarities in the roles of these institutions, focusing on procedural, institutional, and advisory aspects. The findings suggest that while both institutions share a common goal of ensuring accountability and fairness in state administration, the application of the Conseil d'État model in Indonesia may face challenges due to differences in legal traditions, governance structures, and administrative practices. Nevertheless, adopting certain aspects of the Conseil d'État, such as its advisory role and specialized procedural mechanisms, could improve the efficiency and authority of the PTUN. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on legal reforms in Indonesia’s administrative justice system, offering valuable insights into potential reforms that could enhance judicial independence and promote better governance. The study's novelty lies in its focus on cross-national legal comparisons, offering a fresh perspective on the adaptation of foreign legal models in Indonesia. Given the urgent need for judicial reform in Indonesia, the findings of this study could guide future policy changes aimed at strengthening administrative justice.
References
Al’anam, M., Ramli, L., & Hemsanit, N. (2024). The Expansion of the Absolute Competence of Administrative Courts: A Comparative Legal Study with the French Conseil d'État. Nagara Law Journal, 1(02).
Bell, J. et.al, Principles of French Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Burlian, P. Sistem Hukum di Indonesia (Palembang: NoerFikri Offsert, 2015), 68-69.
Chayani, D. (2023). Existence of State Administrative Court in Resolving Disputes. JUSTICES: Journal of Law, 2(2), 105-112.
Delvolvé, P. (2007). The Council of State, the Supreme Court of the French Administrative System.
Herlambang, P. H., Utama, Y. J., & Putrijanti, A. (2023). Upaya Peningkatan dan Penerapan Penggunaan E-Court pada Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Semarang. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 11(2), 94-107.
Marshaal NG. H. et. al, Hukum Acara Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia (Palembang: Tunas Gemilang Press, 2018)
Mercier, A. (2001). Pouvoirs de la dérision, dérision des pouvoirs. Hermès, la revue, 29(1), 9-18.
Miarsa, F. R. D., Zamroni, M., Romadhon, A. H., & Adhaningrum, C. H. (2021). Contempt of Court dalam Pelaksanaan Putusan PTUN: Suatu Perbandingan Indonesia dan Prancis. Journal of Judicial Review, 23(1), 97-114.
Monica, L. S., & Rahman, M. A. M. (2023). The Debate on the Grace Period in Appealing Cases Against the State Administrative Court. Indonesian State Law Review, 6(1), 107-132.
Mujiburohman, D. A. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (STPN Press, 2022)
Pratiwi, S. J., Steven, S., & Permatasari, A. D. P. (2020). The Application of E-Court as an Effort to Modernize the Justice Administration in Indonesia: Challenges & Problems. Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services, 2(1), 39-56.
Puhi, O., Akili, R. H., & Moonti, R. M. (2020). The Settlement of Abuse of Authority by Government Officials. The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education, 2(1), 85-100.
Rayhan, A., & Wijaya, S. K. (2023). Efektifitas Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Menyelesaikan Putusan Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Peradaban Hukum, 1(1), 61-80.
Rosida, H., Putri, N. M., Banjaransari, A. P. R. P., Nadiyya, A., & Sella, C. (2022). The Effectiveness of The Implementation of the E-Court Justice System and The Impact on Administrative Court in Indonesia. Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal, 2(2), 258-272.
Saputro, B. P. B. (2021). Public Information Dispute Resolution (Perspective of the State Administrative Court Act and the Public Information Disclosure Act). Unnes Law Journal, 7(1), 61-88.
Steiner, E. French Law: A Comparative Approach, 2nd edn (Oxford, 2018; online edn, Oxford Academic, 19 Apr. 2018
Sudiarawan, K. A., Karunian, A. Y., Mangku, D. G. S., & Hermanto, B. (2022). Discourses on Citizen Lawsuit as Administrative Dispute Object: Government Administration Law vs. Administrative Court Law. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 7(2), 449-486.
Syah, A. M., Herlambang, P. H., Wedhatami, B., & Marco, C. (2023). Granting Clemency to Antasari Azhar as the Object of a State Administrative Law Dispute. Indonesian State Law Review, 6(2), 177-200.
Tjandra, W. R. (2013). Perbandingan Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dan Conseil d’etat sebagai Institusi Pengawas Tindakan Hukum Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 20(3), 423-439.
Utari, I. S., & Arifin, R. (2020). Law Enforcement and Legal Reform in Indonesia and Global Context: How the Law Responds to Community Development?. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 1(1), 1-4.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
18863Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Adzkiya Azam, Moch. Andry Wikra Wardhana Mamonto, Arif Hidayat, Ristina Yudhanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All works published in the Indonesian State Law Review are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). All writings published in this journal are the personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions.