Is Forced Money (Dwangsom) the Key to Enforcing Administrative Court Decisions? Examining Its Impact on Compliance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v7i2.18874Keywords:
Forced Money (Dwangsom), Compliance, Administrative Court, Enforcement, Legal ReformAbstract
The implementation of forced money (dwangsom) in Indonesia’s administrative courts is a legal tool aimed at ensuring compliance with court decisions, particularly in cases where government bodies fail to fulfill their obligations. This research explores the effectiveness of the dwangsom policy and its implications for improving compliance with administrative court rulings. Using a normative juridical approach, the study analyzes how dwangsom is applied in practice and its impact on the level of compliance by state institutions. The findings reveal that while the dwangsom policy has the potential to encourage compliance, its practical application remains inconsistent. In many instances, government agencies either evade or delay the payment of forced money, leading to minimal impact on ensuring timely enforcement of decisions. The research highlights the need for stricter enforcement mechanisms and greater accountability for public officials who fail to comply with court orders. This study introduces a novel perspective on the role of dwangsom in the broader context of administrative justice in Indonesia. It also addresses the urgency of enhancing its effectiveness to improve the credibility of the administrative courts. The contribution of this research lies in its critical evaluation of the dwangsom policy and its potential for reform. By offering recommendations for strengthening enforcement and compliance, this research aims to contribute to the ongoing discourse on improving the efficiency and accountability of Indonesia's administrative justice system. The findings are particularly relevant to policymakers, legal practitioners, and reform advocates working towards a more responsive legal system.
References
Afifi, M., Halim, A., & Amni, S. Z. (2023). Legal System in the Perspectives of H. L. A Hart and John Rawls, 2(1), 51–61.
Cahyani, H., Et Al. (2022). Kebijakan Pasal-Pasal Kontroversial Dalam RUU KUHP Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Dinamika Sosial Kultur Masyarakat Indonesia. Journal Of Law Administration And Social Science, 2(2), 81–90. Https://Doi.Org/10.54957/Jolas.V2i2.175
Darmawan, A. (2020). Implementasi Pelaksanaan Dwangsom (Uang Paksa) Dalam Gugatan Perdata. El-Iqthisadi Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah. Https://Doi.Org/10.24252/El-Iqthisadi.V1i2.11892
Fahruddin, I. (2003). Konsekuensi Pengawasan Peradilan Administrasi Terhadap Tindakan Pemerintah (Doctoral Dissertation). Banding.
Harahap, Y. (2016). Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, Dan Putusan Pengadilan. Sinar Grafika.
Herlambang, P. H., & T. S. (2020). Peran Pengadilan Dalam Proses Eksekusi Putusan Yang Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Semarang. Indonesian State Law Review (Islrev), 3, 39–45.
Lotulung, P. E. (1986). Beberapa Sistem Tentang Control Segi Hukum Terhadap Pemerintahan. PT. Bhuana Ilmu Populer.
Muliyadi, L. (2001). Tuntutan Uang Paksa (Dwangsom) Dalam Teori Dan Praktik. Djambatan.
Pratama, H. H. (2024). Pengantar Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Rajawali Pers.
Pratama, R., & Wibowo, A. (2023). Asas-Asas Hukum Dalam Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 2(1), 18–21. https://doi.org/10.58705/jpm.v2i1.86
Purwanto, E. (2024). Putusan Tun Tidak Dilaksanakan: Konsekuensi Hukum Dan Upaya Paksa Bagi Pejabat Tun. Snapp, 2(1), 424-432. https://doi.org/10.24929/snapp.v2i1.3166
Rahmadinata, K. (2022). Pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/yvku6
Rahman, C. T. N. (2023). Problematik Upaya Paksa Terkait Eksekusi Putusan Sengketa Kepegawaian. Novum: Jurnal Hukum, 35-48.
Rezah, F. S. (2019). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. CV. Social Politic Genius (Sign).
Sari, E. (2019). Buku Ajar: Hukum Administrasi Negara. Bienaedukasi.
Setyowati, R. K. (2023). The Conclusive Phase of Civil Case Resolution: Examining Execution and Post-Decision Challenges in Indonesian Civil Procedural Law. Unnes Law Journal, 9(2), 311-332.
Susanto, S. N. H. (2019). Karakter Yuridis Sanksi Hukum Administrasi: Suatu Pendekatan Komparasi. Administrative Law & Governance Journal, 2(1), 126-142. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i1.126-142
Syahrizal, D. (2019). Hukum Administrasi Negara & Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Mediapressindo.
Ten Berge, J., & Stroink, W. (2024). Arob In Vogelvlucht.
Tumpa, H. A. (2010). Memahami Eksistensi Uang Paksa (Dwangsom) Dan Implementasinya Di Indonesia. Kencana.
Untoro, U. (2018). Self-Rescpect dan Kesadaran Hukum Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Menuju Keadilan. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 13(1), 37-49.
Wibowo, B. R. (2019). Pembenahan Administrasi Peradilan. Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Kementerian Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia RI.
Wijoyo, S. (2019). Karakteristik Hukum Acara Peradilan Administrasi: Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Airlangga University Press.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
18874Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Felisha Chandra, Syahwal Syahwal, Pratama Herry Herlambang, Muhammad Akbar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All works published in the Indonesian State Law Review are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). All writings published in this journal are the personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions.