AI in Administrative Dispute Resolution: Exploring Opportunities and Risks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v7i2.18877Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Administrative Disputes, Legal Innovation, Judicial Efficiency, Risk and EthicsAbstract
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into the resolution of administrative disputes presents both significant opportunities and potential risks within the legal framework. As administrative courts globally face growing caseloads and demands for faster, more efficient decision-making, AI offers a promising solution for enhancing the speed, accuracy, and consistency of legal processes. This research explores the potential applications of AI in Indonesia's administrative justice system, focusing on its role in case management, decision support, and predictive analytics. The findings highlight several key opportunities, including AI’s potential to streamline case processing, reduce human error, and improve access to justice by automating routine tasks. Additionally, AI can help predict legal outcomes based on data-driven insights, offering both practitioners and courts valuable tools to enhance decision-making. However, the study also identifies significant risks, such as the potential for bias in algorithmic decision-making, lack of transparency, and concerns over the loss of human oversight in critical legal decisions. These risks may undermine the fairness and accountability of administrative dispute resolution. The novelty of this research lies in its focus on the intersection of AI and administrative law, offering a fresh perspective on how emerging technologies can be harnessed to improve judicial efficiency while addressing the inherent challenges. The urgency of this exploration is underscored by the increasing demand for reforms in administrative justice systems. This study contributes valuable insights for policymakers and legal professionals on how to balance innovation with safeguards to ensure AI’s responsible and equitable use in administrative dispute resolution.
References
Almada, Marco. "Automated Uncertainty: A Research Agenda for Artificial Intelligence in Administrative Decisions." Review of European Administrative Law 16, no. 3 (2023): 137-158.
Darman, A. "Peran Artificial Intelligence dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Hukum". Jurnal Hukum (2023)
Fernando, Zico Junius, et al. "Robot Lawyer in Indonesian Criminal Justice System: Problems and Challenges for Future Law Enforcement." Lex Scientia Law Review 7, no. 2 (2023): 489-528.
Herlambang, Pratama Herry, Yos Johan Utama, and Aju Putrijanti. "Upaya Peningkatan dan Penerapan Penggunaan E-Court pada Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Semarang." Jurnal Hukum Progresif 11, no. 2 (2023): 94-107.
Lodder, Arno, and Ernest Thiessen. "The role of artificial intelligence in online dispute resolution." Workshop on online dispute resolution at the international conference on artificial intelligence and law, Edinburgh, UK. 2003.
Lozada-Pimiento, Nicolás. "AI systems and technology in dispute resolution." Uniform Law Review 24, no. 2 (2019): 348-366.
Paristina., Nur. Penggunaan Upaya Administratif bagi Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara. Universitas Airlangga, 2020.
Pudyatmoko, S., & Tjandra, W. I. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya, 1996.
Raso, Jennifer. "AI and administrative law." Artificial Intelligence and the Law in Canada (Toronto: LexisNexis Canada, 2021) (2021).
Wolswinkel, Johan. "Artificial intelligence and administrative law." Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing (2022).
Zeleznikow, John. "Using artificial intelligence to provide intelligent dispute resolution support." Group Decision and Negotiation 30, no. 4 (2021): 789-812.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
18877Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Esa Maulana Wibowo, Ngaboawaji Daniel Nte, Bagus Hendradi Kusuma

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All works published in the Indonesian State Law Review are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). All writings published in this journal are the personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions.