The Enactment of the Common Interest Concept and the Theory of Repressive Legal Protection on Consumer Reviews Against Defamation Claims

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i3.13231

Keywords:

Consumer Reviews, Legal Protection, Common Interest, Repressive Legal Protection, Social Media

Abstract

Essentially, the objective of reviews is to offer testimonials regarding the quality of product based on personal experiences, serving as a reference for potential consumers concerning the product’s attributes and quality. Businesses also leverage consumer reviews as material for product evaluation, marketing, and enhancing after-sales services. However, in practice businesses do not always receive consumer reviews favorably, particularly when these reviews result in financial losses. This is especially true when reviews are published by influencers with substantial social media followings. Consequently, businesses may initiate legal action against consumers for defamation. According to defamation provisions, acts carried out in the public interest cannot be penalized. This study addresses the legal protection of consumers against defamation lawsuits by businesses, employing the common interest concept and the theory of repressive legal protection. The aim is to analyze the application of the common interest concept and the theory of repressive legal protection concerning reviews on social media, aiming to provide new insights for law enforcement officials in handling defamation cases involving consumers and businesses. This study utilizes normative juridical methods, reviewing literature on legislation, legal concepts, and theories. The study concludes that according to the theory of repressive legal protection, businesses that violate their obligations to consumers should be sanctioned. The enactment of the common interest concept to consumer reviews requires an examination of legal evidence and facts, and if proven, should result in sanctions for businesses as a form of repressive legal protection.

References

Agustalita, Dinda Heidiyuan, and Deni Setya Bagus Yuherawan, “Makna Kepentingan Umum Pada Kewenangan Deponering dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum”, Jurnal Suara Hukum 4, no. 1 (2023): 160–89.

Agustianto, Agustianto. "An Exoneration Clause in Standard Agreements: Problems in Consumer Protection." Pandecta Research Law Journal 17, no. 1 (2022): 129-136.

Ali, Moch and Agus Yudha Hernoko, “Characteristics of Party Autonomy in a Transnational Electronic Consumer Contract”, Yuridika 35, no. 1 (2020): 55–74.

Arifin, Zulham. "A Critical Review of Consumer Protection Online Shopping, False Advertising, and Legal Protection." Journal of Law and Sustainable Development 11, no. 5 (2023): 1-15.

Asmorowati, RR. Meiti. “Konsep Kepentingan Umum dalam Pengadaan Tanah Dihubungkan dengan Kepastian Hukum”, Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia 6, no. 1 (2020): 29–55.

Budianto, Edy, and Diah Ayu Wulandari. "Critical Study of Criminal Aspects of Law Number 8 of 1999 Concerning Consumer Protection." Journal of Law and Legal Reform 1, no. 2 (2020): 333-352.

Bunga, Dewi. "Product Reviews by YouTubers: Education or Defamation?." Jurnal Kertha Patrika 43, no. 3 (2021): 226–40.

Devi, Putu Carina Sari, and Suatra Putrawan. "Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Yang Melakukan Review Produk Barang Atau Jasa di Media Sosial." Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 7 (2019):1–14.

Dewi, Retno Sari, Dwiatmanto Dwiatmanto, and Surjanti Surjanti. "Comparison of Consumer Protection Laws Between Indonesia, the Philippines, and South Korea in Achieving Justice." SASI 30, no. 2 (2024): 169-182.

Ezekiel, Kezia. "Our Right to Share, Their Right to Know: An Analysis of Public Interest Defense to Defamation." Lentera Hukum 8, no. 2 (2021): 241-266.

Fajriana, Mia Maulia. “How Are Business Actors Responsible for Consumer Losses in Default Cases?”, Journal of Law and Legal Reform 2, no. 2 (2021): 187–96.

Ferdinal, Yan, and Pudji Astuti. "Tinjauan Yuridis Kebebasan Berpendapat Konsumen Terkait Review Produk di Media Sosial." Novum: Jurnal Hukum 20, no. 1 (2024): 86-96.

Fibrianti, Nurul, et al. "Legal Culture and Legal Consciousness of Consumers: The Influence on Regulation and Enforcement of Consumer Protection Laws." Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 8, no. 2 (2023): 1267-1310.

Gumelar, Agung, and Rabiah Z. Harahap. "Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Dari Delik Pencemaran Nama Baik Suatu Produk di Media Sosial." EduYustisia 2, no. 1 (2023): 40-47.

Herdiana, M. Rifki. "Hukuman Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Melelui Medsos." Journal Evidence of Law 1, no. 3 (2022): 68-78.

Jahriyah, Vita Fajrin et al., “Kebebasan Berekspresi di Media Elektronik dalam Perspektif Pasal 27 Ayat (3) Undang- Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Perubahan Atas Undang- Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Pelayanan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE)”, Sosio Yustisia: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perubahan Sosial 1, no. 2 (2021): 65–87.

Nuryaasiinta, Cut Mayang Widya. "How Far is Consumer Protection in the Health Care Sector?." Unnes Law Journal 6, no. 1 (2020): 47-72.

Priambudi, Rafiki Candra. "Pencemaran Nama Baik Menurut Pasal 310 KUHP dan Pasal 27 Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang ITE." Lex Administratum 8, no. 4 (2020):185–93.

Rahma, Iftinaity Shaumi, et al., “Indonesian Legal Protection for Consumers on the Validity of Electronic Contracts in the E-Commerce Transactions”, Yuridika 37, no. 3 (2022): 697–714.

Rakhmatullah, Bha’iq Roza. Perlindungan Hukum dan Keadilan dalam Musyawarah Ganti Rugi Pengadaan Tanah, ed. Nur Khasanah (Pekalongan: Nasya Expanding Management, 2023).

Raminggela, Marcellino Roberto. "Penerapan Sanksi Pada Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik dan Penghinaan Melalui Media Sosial Menurut UU ITE." Lex Privatum 9, no. 5 (2021): 67–75.

Samudra, Anton Hendrik. "Pencemaran Nama Baik dan Penghinaan Melalui Media Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi di Indonesia Pasca Amandemen UU ITE." Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 50, no. 1 (2020): 91-105.

Schmitz, Benedikt. “Rethinking the Public Interest in Consumer Protection”, European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance 9, no. 2 (2022): 210–35.

Simon, Rita. Consumer Protection and Public Interest (London: Intersentia,2021).

Subagyono, Bambang Sugeng Ariadi, Zahry Vandawati Chumaida, and Mochamad Kevin Romadhona, “Enforcement of Consumer Rights Through Dispute Settlement Resolution Agency to Improve the Consumer Satisfaction Index in Indonesia”, Yuridika 37, no. 3 (2022): 673–96

Taklima, Musa, Adi Sulistiyono, and M. Syamsudin. "Consumer Protection as an Instrument for Fulfilling Human Rights in the Economic Sector and its Constitutionalizing Efforts in the 1945 Constitution." Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum san Syariah 14, no. 1 (2023): 75-105.

Tjipto, Felix Pratama, et al. "Consumer Protection Law: The Case Study of Grabtoko Company in Indonesian E-Commerce Transactions." Journal of Private and Commercial Law 5, no. 2 (2021): 120-140.

Widiarty, Wiwik Sri, and Aartje Tehupeiory. "The Role of Business Law in Improving Consumer Protection in the Digital Age." Journal of Law and Sustainable Development 12, no. 2 (2024): 1-12.

Downloads

Article ID

13231

Published

31-10-2024

How to Cite

“The Enactment of the Common Interest Concept and the Theory of Repressive Legal Protection on Consumer Reviews Against Defamation Claims”. 2024. Journal of Law and Legal Reform 5 (3): 973-1000. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i3.13231.