Criminalization and Punishment Policies in Administrative Disciplinary Law: A Comparative Study of Criminal Law from a Societal Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v6i2.16488Keywords:
Disciplinary Law, Societal Perspective, Legal ReformAbstract
This study aimed to explore how society perceives disciplinary law (DL) policies in comparison to traditional criminal law, particularly in terms of criminalization and punishment. To achieve this goal, data was collected through a questionnaire-based survey involving 137 specialized respondents. The survey offers insight into the various aspects of DL, including its clarity, fairness, and effectiveness in deterring administrative violations and promoting discipline. The results indicated that whereas DL seems effective and fair, urgent reforms are necessary, especially in aligning its procedures and sanctions with those of criminal law. Furthermore, the findings highlighted the need for more precise definitions of misconduct and improved procedural fairness to strengthen public trust and enhance the law’s deterrent effect. Statistical tests reveal that respondents’ opinions are not neutral, with a general consensus in agreement with the statements. The study’s findings highlight the pressing need to review and reform the DL structure to confirm fairness, consistency, and impressionability, thereby advancing immediate action.
References
Al-Tamawi, S. M. Administrative Judiciary, Book 3, Disciplinary Judiciary, 3rd ed., Dar Al-Fikr Al-Arabi, 1987. 45–48.
Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) Report, (2015): 1-596. https://law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/2248227/2015.dec.alrc_129_final_report_.pdf
Bhavani, P., A “Study on Employee’s Discipline and Its Effect on Organizational Performances.” International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI), 9, no. 6, (2020): 1–4. DOI: 10.35629/8028-0906040104
Bruegger, J., A. “Freedom, Legality, and the Rule of Law.” WASH. U. JUR. REV. 9, no. 1 (2016): https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_jurisprudence/vol9/iss1/7
Bernatt, M. “The Principle of Procedural Fairness and its Implementation in the Administrative Proceedings- the Perspective of the Country in the democratic transition,” Paper for the workshop on Constitutional Principles and democratic Transition, (2010): https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228159776_The_Principle_of_Procedural_Fairness_and_its_Implementation_in_the_Administrative_Proceedings_-_Perspective_of_the_Country_in_the_Democratic_Transition#fullTextFileContent
Cole, N. “Consistency in employee discipline: An empirical exploration.” Personnel Review, 37, no. 1, (2008): 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480810839996
Cornford, A. “The Aims and Functions of Criminal Law,” The Modern Law Review, 87, no. 2 (2024): 398–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12846
Duarte, S. “Disciplinary administrative law and its judicial control from a public function perspective,” Revista de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas, 50, no.132 (2020): 100–122
Faure, M. G. & Svatikova, K. Criminal or administrative law to protect the environment? Evidence from Western Europe. Journal of Environmental Law, 24, no. 2, (2012): 253–286. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqs005
Gellhorn, W. Administrative Prescription Imposition of Penalties, Washington University Law Quarterly, 1970 no.3, (1970): 265–286.
G Avdeiko, A., A Gazizov, D. “Reforming the Legislation on Administrative Offences,” Siberian Law Review, 16, no. 4, (2019): 454–467. https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2019-16-4-454-467
Harrington, B. Sheffner, D. “Informal Administrative Adjudication”: An Overview, (2021): 1–32. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46930
Hall, D. (8th ed.). Criminal Law and Procedure. Delmar Cengage Learning, New York, (2008). 24.
Henderson, H. Alaska Criminal Law, (2022): 23–24.
Hirsch, A. v. Censure and Proportionality, (1996): https://academic.oup.com/book/11029 6-19 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262411.003.0011
Kargaudiene, A. “The Principle of Proportionality and its Implementation in Lithuanian Administrative Law,” Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 1, (2008): 41–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10076-008-0003-3
Kidron. E. Y. “Understanding Administrative Sanctioning as Corrective Justice,” U. MICH. J. L. REFORM, 51, (2018): 313–355.
Le Roux, P., A. K. “Consistency in discipline: A new trend from the Courts?” Contemporary Labour Law, 14, no. 4, (2014): 31–40. https://www.workplace.co.za/issues/cll2404.pdf
Ming, H. “Re-discussion of the Nature of Administrative Crime and its Influence on the Status of Administrative Criminal Law,” Modern Law Science, (2004): https://typeset.io/papers/re-discussion-of-the-nature-of-administrative-crime-its-3qusiyj2z5, https://www.doi.org/10.32577/MR.2020.4.2
Ministry of Finance and the Public Service: “Disciplinary Policy for Public Bodies.” (2016): https://www.mof.gov.jm/wp-content/uploads/disciplinary-policy-public-bodies-2016.pdf
Naibaho, N., Harkrisnowo, H. AR, S. and Wibisana, A. G. “Administrative Law: Developments and Challenges in Indonesia,” Indonesia Law Review, 11, no. 1, (2021): Article 1. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v11n1.647
Nirmala K G. & Zegeye, A. Criminal Law I, Teaching Material, (2009): https://www.lawethiopia.com/images/teaching_materials/Criminal%20law%20I.pdf
Rathee, A. “Understanding Administrative Sanctions: A Comprehensive Guide to Types and Consequences,” (2020): https://www.sanctionfy.com/blog/understanding-administrative-sanctions-a-comprehensive- guide-to-types-and-consequences
Renfro, J., L. Public Administration: The Essentials, University of Northern Iowa. https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/1558 (2023).
Shabangu, K., M. Kahn, S. B. Thani, X. C. “Critical Considerations for Effective Discipline Management in the Public Sector,” Administratio Publica, 30, no. 4, (2022): 71–95. https://journals.co.za/doi/epdf/10.10520/ejc adminpub_v30_n4_a5
Simpson, Th., W. ‘Trust and the Rule of Law”, in Ruth Chang, and Amia Srinivasan (eds), Conversations in Philosophy, Law, and Politics (2024): 99–118 https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198864523.003.0005,
Stelkens, U., “General Principles of Administrative Law: Legality of Administration,” https://www.uni-speyer.de/fileadmin/Lehrstuehle/Stelkens/Lehrveranstaltungen/General_Principles_of_Administrative_Law/4_AdministrativeLaw_legality.pdf
Valkadinova, V., “The Principle of Proportionality in the Application of Sanctions and Other Measures of State Coercion According to Bulgarian Legislation and European Union Law.” International Scientific Conference: Law in the context of addressing the Challenges of the Contemporary World. (2018): https://www.prafak.ni.ac.rs/files/zbornik/sadrzaj/zbornici/z79/10z79.pdf
Ukpere, W., “The Effectiveness and Consistency of Disciplinary Actions and Procedures within a South African Organization.” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5, no. 4, (2014): 589–596.
US CODE, (2023). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2023-title21/pdf/USCODE-2023-title21-chap13-subchapI-partD-sec863.pdf
Valkadinova, V., “The Principle of Proportionality in the Application of Sanctions and Other Measures of State Coercion According to Bulgarian Legislation and European Union Law,” International Scientific Conference: Law in the context of addressing the Challenges of the Contemporary World. (2018): https://www.prafak.ni.ac.rs/files/zbornik/sadrzaj/zbornici/z79/10z79.pdf
Downloads
Published
Article ID
16488Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Eltayeib Hussein Mahmoud Sharaf Addin (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
