Inconsistency in the Formulation of Article 2 and Article 3 of Law No. 31 of Corrupt Practices Eradication Law and Disparity in Criminal Penalty for Mining Corruption in the Practice of Law Enforcement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v6i3.19111Keywords:
Unlawful, Abuse of Authority, Mining CorruptionAbstract
This research discusses the transformation of understanding and law enforcement of the elements of Article 2 and Article 3 of the Corruption Eradication Law. The element against the law is Article 2 of the Corruption Eradication Law. In contrast, the element of abuse of authority is the core of the offense in Article 3 of the Corruption Eradication Law. Thus, it is inappropriate to indict the perpetrators of mining corruption with an alternative form of indictment between Article 2 and Article 3 of the Corruption Eradication Law. Inconsistencies in formulating the elements of the offense and the parameters of the article have resulted in disparities in punishment, errors in assessing the existence of abuse of authority by using unlawful parameters and mixing the application of the two articles. This can be viewed in several Supreme Court Decisions in mining corruption cases, where the elements and subjects of the offense are interchangeable. This research aims to study the inconsistent formulation of the elements of the offense in Article 2 and Article 3 of the Corruption Eradication Law, which has led to disparities in punishment in mining corruption cases. This study is conducted by analyzing several Supreme Court Jurisprudence. This research employs normative research with a statutory approach, concept approach, and case approach. The results of this study aim to provide a recommendation on the concept of against the law and abuse of authority in the Corruption Eradication Law.
References
Adami Chazawi, Hukum Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia, Rajawali Pers 2016.
Ade Lutfi Prayogo, Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Pertambangan Rakyat dalam Reklamasi Gumuk Setelah Kegiatan Tambang, Jurnal Lentera Hukum, Volume 5, No.3, Tahun 2018. htps://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v5i3.8201.
Adji Indriyanto Seno, Korupsi Kebijakan Aparatur Negara & Hukum Pidana, CV. Diadit Media, Jakarta, 2007
Ahmad Redi. (2023). Responsive Law Enforcement in Preventing and Eradicating Illegal Mining in Indonesia. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(8), e1436. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i8.1436
Andi Hamzah, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Yaraif Watampone, Jakarta, 2005
Arnold J. Heidenheimer and Michael Johnston, Political Corruption: Concepts and Context, New Brunswick: Transaction Publisher, 2007.
Brian John dan Katrine Thompson dalam Tatiek Sri Djatmiati, Hukum Administrasi Sebuah Bunga Rampai, Laksabang Ustisia, 2021.
David Boto-García, Roberto Balado-Naves, Consumers’ demand for operational licensing: evidence from Airbnb in Paris’, Annals of Tourism Research, 100 (2023), pp. 9,
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 87/Pid.Sus/TPK/2023, dated November 28, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2023.103566.
Epakartika,Rizky Nugraha M,Agung Budiono, Peran Masyarakat Sipil dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi Sektor Sumber Daya Alam, Jurnal Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS, 5(2-2), hal 93-106. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v512,2,485.
Hovelsrud, Grete K., Siri Veland, Bjørn Kaltenborn, Julia Olsen, and Halvor Dannevig, ‘Sustainable Tourism in Svalbard: Balancing Economic Growth, Sustainability, and Environmental Governance’, Polar Record, 57 (2021), pp.1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247421000668.
Jeramy Pope, Strategi Memberantas Korupsi, Elemen Sistem Integritas Nasional, Trasparency Internasional Indonesia dan Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta, 2003.
Karjoko, Lego, I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani, and Willy Naresta Hanum, ‘Legal Policy of Old Wells Petroleum Mining Management Based on Social Justice in Realising Energy Sovereignty’, Sriwijaya Law Review, 6.2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol6.Iss2.1745.pp286-303.
Manao Disisplin F, Pertanggungjawaban Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Pejabat Pemerintah Menurut Hukum Administrasi Dihubungkan Dengan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Disertasi, Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Katolik Parahyangan, Bandung, 2017
Moeljatno, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (Terjemahan Cetakan ke 10, 1978).
Nguyen, Canh Phuc, Christophe Schinckus, and Binh Quang Nguyen, ‘Does Tourism Reduce the Shadow Economy? An International Evidence’, Heliyon, 9.11 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22399.
Palacin, Victoria & Nelimarkka, Matti & Reynolds-Cuéllar, Pedro & Becker, Christoph. (2020). The Design of Pseudo-Participation. https://doi.org/10.1145/3384772.3385141.
Parmono, Budi, Penyalahgunaan Wewenang dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia, Disertasi, Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, 2017.
Perlaviciute, Goda, and Lorenzo Squintani, ‘Public Participation in Climate Policy Making: Toward Reconciling Public Preferences and Legal Frameworks’, One Earth, 2.4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.03.009.
Philipus M. Hadjon, Hukum Administrasi Dan Good Governance dalam Hukum Administrasi Sebagai Instrumen Hukum Untuk Meweujudkan Good Governance, Trisakti, 2010.
R, Wiyono, Pembahasan UU Pememberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Sinar Grafika, 2009.
Razananda Skandiva, Urgensi Penerapan Foreign Bribery Dalam Konvensi Antikorupsi di Indonesia, Jurnal INTEGRITAS, Vol.7, No. 2.
Sapardjaja Komariah Emong, Ajaran Sifat Melawan Hukum Materiil Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Studi, Alumni, Bandung, 2002
See Court Decision, Number 2065 K/Pid/2006 dated 21 December 2006 in the name of defendant Kuntjoro Hendrartono.
See the Decision of the Central Jakarta District Court Number: 17/Pid.Sus.TPK/2022/PN.Jkt.Pst,
See the Decision of the Kendari District Court in case Number 43/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN.Kdi, dated February 14, 2022.
See the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 87/Pid.Sus/TPK/2023 dated November 28, 2023 in the name of the defendant Syahrina.
Sitepu, Alfon Octavianus, Faisal Santiago, and Ricky Purwanto, ‘The Effectiveness of Licensing on Tourism Business Activity in the Area of the Toba Lake’, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Business Law and Local Wisdom in Tourism (ICBLT 2021), 605.Icblt (2021). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211203.002.
Suci Nurlaeli, “Analisis Perbandingan Pengaturan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia Dan Malaysia,” Lex Jurnalica 20, no. 2 (2023).
Suparto, Fadhel Arjuna Adinda, Azamat Esirgapovich Esanov, and Zamira Esanova Normurotovna, ‘Administrative Discretion in Indonesia & Netherland Administrative Court: Authorities and Regulations’, Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 4.1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v4i1.189.
Tatiek Sri Djatmiati, “Perizinan Sebagai Instrumen Yuridis Dalam Pelayanan Publik,” Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar Dalam Bidang Hukum Admnistrasi Pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga, 24 November, 2007.
Tatik Sri Djatmiati, Prinsip Izin Usaha Industri Di Indonesia, Disertasi, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 2004.
Volpato, Annalisa, Mariolina Eliantonio, and Kathryn Wright, ‘Transparency and Participation in the Face of Scientific Uncertainty: Concluding Remarks’, European Journal of Risk Regulation, 14.2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2023.34.
Winarno, Nur Basuki, Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah Yang Berimplikasi Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Disertasi, Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Unair, 2006.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
19111Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Eny Suastuti, Nur Basuki Minarno, Akhmad Farid Mawardi Sufyan, Gatoet Poernomo (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).








