The Absence of Judicial Review on Constitutional Amendments in Indonesia: Urgency and Legal Reform for Constitutional Safeguards

Novendri M. Nggilu; Zulkifli Zulkifli; Yassine Chami; Indra Perwira; Ali Abdurahman

doi:10.15294/jllr.v6i2.20888

Authors

Novendri M. Nggilu Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7417-8555
Zulkifli Zulkifli Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasir Pengaraian, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6374-3800
Yassine Chami College of Law, Abu Dhabi University, United Arab Emirates Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0065-3936
Indra Perwira Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3571-3612
Ali Abdurahman Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4577-9914

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v6i2.20888

Keywords:

Basic Structure, Constitutional Amendment, Judicial Review

Abstract

The judicial review of constitutional amendments remains underexplored in Indonesia’s legal framework despite its recognition in global constitutional discourse. Several jurisdictions, including India, Germany, and Colombia, Turkey have established judicial safeguards to prevent amendments from undermining fundamental constitutional principles. This study aims to propose a judicial review model for constitutional amendments in Indonesia to ensure the protection of constitutional identity and democratic principles. Using a comparative legal approach, this study examines international judicial practices alongside a normative analysis of Indonesia’s constitutional framework. The findings highlight three key justifications for judicial review in Indonesia: historical, philosophical-juridical, and sociological. Historically, constitutional transitions have often violated procedural norms, as seen in the 1959 Presidential Decree, which reinstated the 1945 Constitution through executive action. Philosophically, Pancasila, as Indonesia’s foundational ideology, holds a supra-constitutional status and should serve as a benchmark for amendment review. Sociologically, the absence of review mechanisms exposes constitutional amendments to political manipulation, such as attempts to extend presidential term limits. This study advocates for an a posteriori judicial review model, granting the Constitutional Court the authority to assess amendments post-enactment. This model aligns with international practices and strengthens constitutional safeguards against politically motivated amendments. Implementing such a mechanism would uphold constitutional supremacy, democracy, and the rule of law in Indonesia.

References

Ahmad, Ahmad, Fence M. Wantu, and Novendri Nggilu. Hukum Konstitusi: Menyongsong Fajar Perubahan Konstitusi Indonesia Melalui Pelibatan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2020.

Ahmad, and Novendri M. Nggilu. “Denyut Nadi Amandemen Kelima UUD 1945 Melalui Pelibatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Prinsip the Guardian of the Constitution.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 4 (2019).

Ahmed, Kawser. “Revisiting Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments in Bangladesh: Article 7B, the Asaduzzaman Case, and the Fall of the Basic Structure Doctrine.” Israel Law Review 56, no. 2 (July 2023): 263–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223721000297.

Albert, Richard. “The Three Varieties of Unamendability.” In Constitutional Amendments, by Richard Albert, 139–72, 1st ed. Oxford University PressNew York, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190640484.003.0005.

Allezard, Laurianne. “Constitutional Identity, Identities and Constitutionalism in Europe.” Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies 63, no. 1 (December 21, 2022): 58–77. https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2022.00391.

Benítez-R., Vicente F. “Beyond Invalidation: Unorthodox Forms of Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments and Constitution-Amending Case Law in Colombia.” Revista de Investigações Constitucionais 9, no. 2 (November 8, 2022): 269. https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v9i2.86742.

Berchenko, Hryhorii, Tetiana Slinko, and Oleh Horai. “Unamendable Provisions of the Constitution and the Territorial Integrity of Ukraine.” Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 5, no. 4–2 (December 13, 2022): 113–27. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-5.4-n000447.

Dube, Felix. “The South African Constitution as an Instrument of Doing What Is Just, Right and Fair.” In Die Skriflig / In Luce Verbi 54, no. 1 (December 21, 2020). https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v54i1.2601.

Eddyono, Luthfi Widagdo. “Quo Vadis Pancasila Sebagai Norma Konstitusi Yang Tidak Dapat Diubah.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 3 (October 8, 2019): 585. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1637.

———. “The Unamendable Articles of the 1945 Constitution.” Constitutional Review 2, no. 2 (February 6, 2017): 252. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev225.

Fauzia, Ana, and Fitria Esfandiari. “Political Party Deliberation: Mechanism for Safeguarding Constituent Rights against Vacancies in House of Representatives Affected by Political Party Dissolution.” Jambura Law Review 6, no. 2 (July 28, 2024): 452–281. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v6i2.24110.

Garlicki, Lech, and Yaniv Roznai. “Introduction: Constitutional Unamendability in Europe.” European Journal of Law Reform 21, no. 3 (May 2019): 217–25. https://doi.org/10.5553/EJLR/138723702019021003001.

Hapsoro, Fakhris Lutfianto, and Ismail Ismail. “Interpretasi Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Untuk Mewujudkan The Living Constitution.” Jambura Law Review 2, no. 2 (June 19, 2020): 139–60. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v2i2.5644.

Hein, Michael. “Do Constitutional Entrenchment Clauses Matter? Constitutional Review of Constitutional Amendments in Europe.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 18, no. 1 (May 21, 2020): 78–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaa002.

Holoubek, Michael, and Ulrich Wagrandl. “A Model for the World: The Austrian Constitutional Court Turns 100.” ICL Journal 17, no. 3 (September 26, 2023): 251–76. https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2023-0029.

Ibrahim, Mohammad. “Pembatasan Kekuasaan Amendemen Konstitusi: Teori, Praktik Di Beberapa Negara Dan Relevansinya Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 3 (November 10, 2020): 558. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1735.

Ismail, Dian Ekawaty, Novendri M. Nggilu, and Irlan Puluhulawa. Metode Penelitian Hukum: Teori, Aplikasi, Dan Inovasi Dalam Penelitian Hukum. Edited by Tiara Oktaviana Namira Daud. Kalimantan Selatan: Ruang Karya, 2025.

Jimly Asshiddiqie. Pancasila: Identitas Konstitusi Berbangsa Dan Bernegara. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2020.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, Anna Triningsih, and Achmad Edi Subiyanto. Pancasila Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2022.

Lailam, Tanto, and Nita Andrianti. “Legal Policy of Constitutional Complaints in Judicial Review: A Comparison of Germany, Austria, Hungary, and Indonesia.” BESTUUR 11, no. 1 (August) (April 13, 2023): 75. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v11i1.70052.

Landau, David E, Rosalind Dixon, and Yaniv Roznai. “From an Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment to an Unconstitutional Constitution? Lessons from Honduras.” Global Constitutionalism 8, no. 1 (March 2019): 40–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381718000151.

———. “From an Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment to an Unconstitutional Constitution? Lessons from Honduras.” Global Constitutionalism 8, no. 1 (March 2019): 40–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381718000151.

Law Number 7 of 1950 Concerning Amendments to the Temporary Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia to Become the Provisional Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (1950). http://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38102/uu-no-7-tahun-1950.

M. Nggilu, Novendri. “Menggagas Sanksi Atas Tindakan Constitution Disobedience Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 1 (April 1, 2019): 43. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1613.

M. Nggilu, Novendri, Dian Ekawaty Ismail, Tri Sulistyowati, and Mohamad Rivaldi Moha. “Constitutional Crisis: Intensifying Disobedience to the Decisions of the Indonesian Constitutional Court.” Revista Chilena de Derecho 50, no. 2 (October 23, 2023): 115–32. https://doi.org/10.7764/R.502.5.

MacFarlane, Emmet. “The Unconstitutionality of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments.” Manitoba Law Journal 45, no. 1 (April 25, 2023): 21. https://doi.org/10.29173/mlj1320.

Maulinawaty Nadya Dewi, Nurul. “Perlindungan Terhadap Identitas Konstitusi Indonesia.” Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran 2, no. 1 (November 30, 2020): 21–37. https://doi.org/10.23920/jphp.v2i1.265.

Muchtar Hadi Saputra. Konstitusi Rakyat: Partisipasi Masyaralat Dalam Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2019.

Nggilu, Novendri. “Politik Hukum Pengujian Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Secara Formal.” Universitas Padjadjaran, 2024.

Nggilu, Novendri M, Ahmad, Moh. Rivaldi Moha, Apripari, and Moh. Hidayat Muhtar. “Abusive Constitutional Court: Dysplasia and the Destructive Power of Constitutional Court Decisions.” Estudios Constitucionales 22, no. 2 (2024).

Nggilu, Novendri M., Indra Perwira, Ali Abdurahman, Mohamad Rivaldi Moha, and Adelia Rachmaniar. “Rethinking Indonesian Constitutional Amendments: The Prospects and Perils of Judicial Review.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 9, no. 2 (December 21, 2024): 1027–66. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v9i2.19158.

Nggilu, Novendri M, Wahidullah, Novi Noviawati, and Dian Ekawaty Ismail. “Indonesia’s Constitutional Identity: A Comparative Study of Islamic Constitutionalism.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah 16, no. 2 (2024): 480–500.

Nggilu, Novendri, Mohamad Rivaldi Moha, Muhammad Ridho Sinaga, and Adelia Rachmaniar. “Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments: Comparison Between India, Germany, Colombia, and the Relevancy with Indonesia.” Lex Scientia Law Review 8, no. 1 (September 22, 2024). https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v8i1.1901.

Nggilu, Novendri Mohamad, Lisnawaty Wadju Badu, and Suwitno Yutye Imran. “Legal Protection Bonda And Bulango Languange : In Reality And Prospect.” Jambura Law Review 3, no. 1 (2020): 19–36. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v3i1.6947.

Nggilu, Novendri, Indra Perwira, and Ali Abdurahman. “Constitutionality Review of Indonesian Constitutional Amendments: History and Future.” Russian Law Journal 11, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.52783/rlj.v11i2.517.

Novendri M. Nggilu, Indra Perwira, and Ali Abdurahman. “Constitutionality Review of Indonesia Constitutional Amendment: History and Future.” Russian Law Journal 11, no. 2 (n.d.): 117–25.

Novendri M, Nggilu, Ramdhan Kasim, and Lisnawaty Badu. “Indonesian Constitutional Amendment 4.0 Era: Main Challenges and Future Prospect.” Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 23, no. Special Issue (2020).

Olcay, Tarik. “The Unamendability of Amendable Clauses: The Case of the Turkish Constitution.” In An Unamendable Constitution?, edited by Richard Albert and Bertil Emrah Oder, 68:313–43. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95141-6_12.

Pan Mohamad Faiz. “Menguji Konstitusionalitas Amandemen Konstitusi.” Majalah Konstitusi, 2020. https://panmohamadfaiz.com/2020/11/04/menguji-konstitusionalitas-amendemen-konstitusi/.

Petrov, Jan. “How to Detect Abusive Constitutional Practices.” European Constitutional Law Review, May 15, 2024, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019624000142.

Polzin, Monika. “The Basic-Structure Doctrine and Its German and French Origins: A Tale of Migration, Integration, Invention and Forgetting.” Indian Law Review 5, no. 1 (January 2, 2021): 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2020.1866882.

Prasetio, Dicky Eko, and Hananto Widodo. “Ius Constituendum Pengujian Formil Dalam Perubahan Konstitusi.” AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 4, no. 1 (June 7, 2022): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v4i1.1478.

Rasyid, Usman, Novendri Mohamad Nggilu, Fence Wantu, Julisa Aprilia Kaluku, and Ahmad Ahmad. “Reformulation of the Authority of Judicial Commission: Safeguarding the Future of Indonesian Judicial Power.” Jambura Law Review 5, no. 2 (July 31, 2023): 386–413. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v5i2.24239.

Ridwanul Hoque. “The Evolution of the Basic Structure Doctrine in Bangladesh: Reflections on Dr. Kamal Hossain’s Unique Contribution.” The Indian Journal of Constitutional Law 10 (2021): 1–23.

Roznai, Y., and S. Yolcu. “An Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment--the Turkish Perspective: A Comment on the Turkish Constitutional Court’s Headscarf Decision.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 10, no. 1 (January 1, 2012): 175–207. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mos007.

Roznai, Yaniv. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: The Limits of Amendment Powers. First published in paperback. Oxford Constitutional Theory. Oxford, United Kingdom New York, United States of America: Oxford University Press, 2019.

Roznai, Yaniv, Rosalind Dixon, and David E Landau. “Judicial Reform or Abusive Constitutionalism in Israel.” Israel Law Review 56, no. 3 (November 2023): 292–304. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223723000171.

Roznaʾi, Yaniv. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: The Limits of Amendment Powers. First published in paperback. Oxford Constitutional Theory. Oxford, United Kingdom New York, United States of America: Oxford University Press, 2019.

Scotti, Valentina Rita. “Constitutional Amendments and Constitutional Core Values: The Brazilian Case in a Comparative Perspective.” Revista de Investigações Constitucionais 5, no. 3 (September 5, 2018): 59. https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v5i3.60979.

Sethi, Amal. “When Should Courts Invalidate Constitutional Amendments?” ICL Journal 18, no. 1 (March 25, 2024): 25–57. https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2023-0026.

Shah, Dian A H. “The Malaysian Election Commission: Navigating Electoral Authoritarianism and Political Change.” Asian Journal of Comparative Law 16, no. S1 (December 2021): S105–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2021.31.

Silva, Luis Alejandro, and Fernando Contreras. “La Doctrina De La Sustitución De La Constitución En Colombia.” Estudios Constitucionales 18, no. 1 (2020): 395–434. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52002020000100395.

Suteu, Silvia. Eternity Clauses in Democratic Constitutionalism. 1st ed. Oxford University PressOxford, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198858867.001.0001.

Tarik Olcay, Richard Albert, and Malkhaz Nakashidze. “The Formalist Resistance to Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments.” Hasting Law Journal 70, no. 3 (2019): 639–70.

Tommasini, Nicola. “Judicial Self-Empowerment and Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 22, no. 1 (April 16, 2024): 161–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moae009.

Wischmeyer, Thomas. “Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 15, no. 4 (November 3, 2017): 1242–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mox094.

———. “Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 15, no. 4 (November 3, 2019): 1242–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mox094.

Yaniv Roznai. “Constitutional Amendability and Unamendability in South-East Asia.” Journal of Comparative Law 14, no. 1 (2019): 188–204.

———. “Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments—The Migration and Success of a Constitutional Idea.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 61, no. 03 (2013): 657-720,.

Yaniv Roznai, Joel Colón-Ríos. “A Constitutional Theor A Constitutional Theory of Territoriality: The Case of Puer Oriality: The Case of Puerto Rico.” Cleveland State Law Review 70, no. 2 (2022): 279–333.