Legal Reform the Meaning of Final and Binding Decisions of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (Review of the Consumer Protection Act and Supreme Court Cassation Decision)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i2.2508Keywords:
BPSK, BPSK decision, final and binding, Consumer Dispute Resolution AgencyAbstract
Consumer disputes in Indonesia can be resolved outside the court system through the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK), which issues decisions considered final and binding. Despite this, the legal framework permits objections to these decisions at the District Court, and further appeals to the Supreme Court, leading to considerable legal uncertainty. This research seeks to clarify the true nature of final and binding as applied to BPSK decisions under Article 54(3) of Law 8/1999. Utilizing a normative juridical approach with both statute and case law analysis, the study highlights a critical inconsistency: the finality of BPSK decisions does not align with the finality of Constitutional Court decisions. While regulations such as Kepmen 350/2001 and Perma 1/2006 were introduced to address these issues, BPSK still encounters practical difficulties in implementing Law 8/1999 effectively. The urgency of this research is underscored by the ongoing legal ambiguity surrounding BPSK decisions, which undermines public confidence and the effectiveness of the dispute resolution process. The findings reveal that despite regulatory attempts, the current legal framework fails to provide the necessary clarity and consistency. To address these challenges and enhance legal certainty for the public, this study advocates for a revision of the Consumer Protection Act (UUPK). Such a revision would ensure a more coherent and reliable framework for final and binding decisions by BPSK, thereby improving the overall efficacy of consumer dispute resolution in Indonesia.
References
Alfian, Muhammad. "Menggugat Sifat Final dan Mengikat Putusan Perlindungan Konsumen." Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 2 (2019): 26-46.
Bil Fi'li, Dimas Auliya Fikri. “Disparitas Putusan Mahkamah Agung Tentang Kewenangan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Pembiayaan Konsumen”. Thesis (Malang: Universitas Brawijaya, 2018).
Fibrianti, Nurul, et al. "Legal Culture and Legal Consciousness of Consumers: The Influence on Regulation and Enforcement of Consumer Protection Laws." Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 8, no. 2 (2023): 1267-1310.
Ginting, Sryani. "Interpretasi Gramatikal Sistematis Historis Kasus Dugaan Penodaan Agama Oleh Ahok." Law Pro Justitia 2, no. 2 (2017): 61-75.
Gunarsa, Surya Muhammad. "Kekuatan Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Terkait Keberatan dan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Sebagai Alternative Dispute Resolution dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen." SASI 25, no. 2 (2019): 160-172.
Handoko, Duwi. Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (Pekanbaru: Hawa & Ahwa, 2019).
Helmi, Hanum Rahmaniar. "Eksistensi Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen dalam Memutus Sengketa Konsumen di Indonesia." Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER 1, no. 1 (2015): 77-89.
Kristiyanto, Daniel. "Menggugat Sifat Final dan Mengikat Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK)." Jurnal Ilmu Hukum: ALETHEA 1, no. 2 (2018): 128-141.
Kurniawan, Kurniawan. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen: Problematika Kedudukan dan Kekuatan Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) (Malang: UB Press, 2011).
Laiskodat, Varel Tristan Ayub, and Suherman Suherman. "Problematika Undang–Undang Perlindungan Konsumen Terkait Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Keputusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen." Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora 8, no. 6 (2021): 1429-1439.
Malik Malik, “Telaah Makna Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Final dan Mengikat”, Jurnal Konstitusi 6, no. 1 (2009): 79-104.
Mannas, Yussy Adelina. "Upaya Keberatan atas Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen ditinjau dari Hukum Acara dan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen." Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER 1, no. 1 (2015): 91-109.
Maryanto, Maryanto. Prosedur Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen di BPSK (Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen) (Semarang: UNISSULA Press, 2019).
Maulidi, M. Agus. "Menyoal Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Final dan Mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusi: Questioning the Executorial Force on Final and Binding Decision of." Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 2 (2019): 339-362.
Muhaimin, Metode Penelitian Hukum (Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020).
Nurhayati, N. Sri. "Kepastian Hukum Eksekusi Riil Terhadap Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Nomor 09/PTS/BPSK-Tangsel/VI/2015 Dihubungkan dengan Pasal 54 Ayat (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen." Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua: Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan 7, no. 1 (2020): 143-151.
Nuryaasiinta, Cut Mayang Widya. "How Far is Consumer Protection in the Health Care Sector?." Unnes Law Journal 6, no. 1 (2020): 47-72.
Rusli, Tami. "Penyelesaian Sengketa antara konsumen dan pelaku usaha menurut peraturan perundang-undangan." Keadilan Progresif 3, no. 1 (2012): 87-102.
Sahnan, S. "Pilihan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah di Luar Pengadilan (Studi Kasus Tanah Rowok, Lombok Tengah, NTB)." Mimbar Hukum 27, no. 3 (2015): 404-417.
Sutowibowo, Sutowibowo. “Kekuatan Putusan Final dan Mengikat Serta Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK)”, Jendela Informasi Hukum di Bidang Perdagangan (2014): 24-30.
Syarief, Elza, and Shelvi Rusdiana. "Penerapan Prinsip Arbitrase dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 dan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999." Journal of Law and Policy Transformation 1, no. 2 (2016): 79-109.
Tjipto, Felix Pratama, et al. "Consumer Protection Law: The Case Study of Grabtoko Company in Indonesian E-Commerce Transactions." Journal of Private and Commercial Law 5, no. 2 (2021): 120-140.
Zaini, Zulfi Diane. "Implementasi Pendekatan Yuridis Normatif dan Pendekatan Normatif Sosiologis dalam Penelitian Ilmu Hukum." Pranata Hukum 6, no. 2 (2011): 117-132.
Downloads
Article ID
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nayila Rehman, M. Hamidi Masykur, Setiawan Wicaksono (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
