The Character of Peace in Judges’ Customary Criminal Receptions as Restorative Justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.vol5i1.2518Keywords:
Judge, Reception, Restorative JusticeAbstract
The idea that restorative justice primarily derives from indigenous communities' beliefs, which have existed for a very long time and have evolved into customary law from generation to generation, gave rise to the term restorative justice in Indonesia. According to Article 5 paragraph (1) of the Judicial Power Law, it is the duty of the judge to investigate, adhere to, and comprehend the legal values and sense of justice that exist in society. The author of this study will examine how judges in courts use restorative justice in the process of interpreting local customary law to avoid conflicts with it. And discover what challenges judges in court face in accepting this customary law. The author's research strategy is normative juridical and is based on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal resources. According to research, district court judges can significantly contribute to the realization of restorative justice in the context of customary criminal law by having a thorough understanding of customary law, employing a mediation approach, enforcing restorative sanctions, offering education and counseling; and placing a high priority on reconciliation. The current national criminal justice system can be viewed as failing to represent the interests of victims. The social background of the judge's origin, the judge's educational background, the judge's ethnicity, and the environment at the time of the hearing are all barriers to judges accepting customary law in their decisions.
References
Abbas, Syahrizal. Mediasi dalam Hukum Syariah, Hukum Adat, dan Hukum Nasional. (Jakarta: Kencana, 2011).
Ali, Achmad. Menguak Tabir Hukum. (Jakarta: Pustaka Prima, 1988).
Antari, Putu Eva Ditayani, and I. Kadek Budiadinata Satriatama Adnyana. "Kewenangan dan kekuatan Hukum Putusan yang Dikeluarkan oleh Kerta Desa Adat di Bali." Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 2 (2023): 187-210.
Apriyani, Rini. "Keberadaan Sanksi Adat Dalam Penerapan Hukum Pidana Adat." Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS 6, no. 3 (2018): 227-246.
Atmasasmita, Romli. “Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia Setelah Berlakunya Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana”, in Bunga Rampai Hukum Acara Pidana. (Bandung: Penerbit Binacipta, 1983).
Badu, Lisnawaty Wadju, and Julisa Aprilia Kaluku. "Restoratif Justice In the Perspective of Customary Law: A Solution to the Settlement of Narcotics Crimes Committed by Children." Jambura Law Review 4, no. 2 (2022): 313-327.
Dasrol, Dasrol, and Riska Fitriani. "Model Mediasi Adat dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pelanggaran Hukum di Kabupaten Pelalawan." Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum 9, no. 1 (2022): 98-111.
David, David, Oheo K. Haris, and Handrawan Handrawan. “Penguatan Putusan Hukum Adat Melalui Penetapan Pengadilan dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Umum.” Halu Oleo Legal Research 4, no. 1 (2022): 76-88.
Dimalouw, Jefri Eriks. "Penerapan Sanksi Adat Terhadap Perbuatan Pidana Yang Dilakukan oleh Masyarakat Suku Kawei di Kabupaten Raja Ampat." Jurnal Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora 9, no. 2 (2022): 684-693.
Had, Fikri. “Negara Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia.” Wijaya Putra Law Review 1, no 2 (2022): 170-188.
Haeratun, Haeratun, and Fatahullah Fatahullah. "Efektivitas Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama." Batulis Civil Law Review 3, no. 1 (2022): 29-59.
Hakim, Achmad Caesar Luthful, and Sartika Intaning Pradhani. “Penerapan Pendekatan Formalistik dalam Penemuan Hukum Adat Oleh Hakim: Studi Kasus Sengketa Surat Keterangan Tanah Adat di Kalimantan Tengah.” Bhumi: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan 7, no. 1 (2021), 96-111.
Hasan, Ahmadi. "Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Upaya (Non Ligitasi) Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan." Al-Banjari: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 6, no. 1 (2007): 91-106.
Hasanah, Sovia. “Sudah Dipidana Secara Adat, Dapatkah Dipidana Lagi Berdasarkan Hukum Nasional?” HukumOnline, August 9 (2023), retrieved from <https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/sudah-dipidana-secara-adat--dapatkah-dipidana-lagi-berdasarkan-hukum-nasional-lt57dd96e1ea96c/>
Hutauruk, Rufinus Hotmaulana. Penanggulangan Kejahatan Korporasi Melalui Pendekatan Restorative, Sebuah Terobosan Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019).
Imanuel, Gerald Liem “Penerapan Hukum Pidana Adat dalam Hukum Indonesia.” Lex Crimen 2, no. 5 (2013): 122-129.
Jaya, Nyoman Serikat Putra. "Hukum (Sanksi) Pidana Adat dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional." Masalah-Masalah Hukum 45, no. 2 (2016): 123-130.
Kusmayanti, Hazar, Agus Mulya Karsona, and Efa Laela Fakhriah. "Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Melalui Putusan Perdamaian di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Pengadilan Negeri Padang Kelas I (A)." ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata 6, no. 1 (2020): 35-54.
Kusmayanti, Hazar, et al. "Judges’ Acceptance of Sharia-Inspired Laws in Indonesia." Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 17, no. 2 (2023): 199-214.
Kusmayanti, Hazar. “Penguatan Lembaga Penyelesaian Sengketa Adat Dalam Rangka Penegakan Hukum Menuju Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia”. Dissertation (Bandung: Universitas Padjadjaran, 2022).
Malik, Ichsan. Resolusi Konflik Jembatan Perdamaian. (Jakarta: Kompas Gramedia, 2017).
Masril, Masril, and Ade Kosasih. "Keberlakuan Asas Ne Bis in Idem Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Adat dalam Tata Hukum Indonesia." Al Imarah: Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik Islam 4, no. 1 (2019): 49-56.
Panjaitan, Hulman. "Keberadaan Hukum Adat dalam Yurisprudensi." Jurnal Hukum Tô-Râ 2, no. 3 (2016): 413-420.
Pasapan, Patricia, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, and Denny Latumaerissa. "Delik Adat dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana di Indonesia." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 2 (2022): 193-204.
Prakasa, Satria Unggul Wicaksana. "Forestry Sector Corruption and Oligarchy: Lesson Learn from the Laman Kinipan Indigenous People, Central Kalimantan." Unnes Law Journal 8, no. 1 (2022): 87-104.
Putri, Dina Desvita Pramesti. "Sounding the Justice for Child: Does Restorative Justice Matters?." Journal of Law and Legal Reform 4, no. 3 (2023): 303-324.
Raharjo, Trisno. "Mediasi Pidana dalam Ketentuan Hukum Pidana Adat." Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 17, no. 3 (2010): 492-519.
Rasyid, Laila. "Pengakuan Terhadap Hukum Adat dalam Kajian Putusan Kasus Tanah Hibah Adat di Pengadilan Sigli." Riau Law Journal 1, no. 1 (2017): 61-72.
Rofiqi, Trisna Muhammad, et al. "Peranan Hati Nurani Hakim dalam Persidangan." Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan, Seni, Sains dan Sosial Humaniora 1, no. 1 (2022): 1-18.
Sakirman, Sakirman. “The Law Interpretation Towards the Double Position of Judges in Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 14, no. 1 (2017): 189-212.
Setiadi, Tolib. Intisari Hukum Adat Indonesia (Dalam Kajian Kepustakaan). (Bandung: Alfabeta, 2009).
Suhariyanto, Budi. "Problema Penyerapan Adat Oleh Pengadilan Dan Pengaruhnya Bagi Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Nasional." Mimbar Hukum 30, no. 3 (2018): 421-435.
Suhariyanto, Budi. “Kedudukan Perdamaian Sebagai Penghapus Pemidanaan Guna Mewujudkan Keadilan Dalam Pembaruan Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Rechtsvinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Naisonal 5, no. 1 (2017): 1-19.
Surya, Faizal Adi. "Tinjaun Mediasi Penal dalam Perspektif Hukum Adat dan Hukum Islam." Jurnal Jurisprudence 5, no. 2 (2015): 118-126.
Susanto, Efendi. "Sila Ke-Empat Pancasila dan Iklim Demokrasi Indonesia Saat Ini." Masalah-Masalah Hukum 50, no. 1 (2021): 84-93.
Syam, Misnar, et al. "Pembuktian dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pada Peradilan Adat." UNES Journal of Swara Justisia 6, no. 4 (2023): 565-575.
Takapente, Isabella. "Tinjauan Hukum terhadap Cara Hakim Menyelesaikan Sengketa Waris Adat." Lex et Societatis 8, no. 1 (2020): 126-136.
Yulianti, Rena. Melihat Kembali Keberadaan Korban dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. (Yogyakarta: Total Media, 2014).
Downloads
Article ID
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
