Digital Transformation With the Impact of AI in Government Decision Making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v6i4.30339Keywords:
Digital Transformation, Artificial Intelligence, Legal Reform, Governance, Constitutional LawAbstract
This abstract reviews digital transformation in the context of government decision making with respect to the impact produced by AI and the implications for constitutional law. Digital transformation has become the main driver in the industrial revolution that has swept across various sectors, including the government. The presence of AI in the governmental decision-making process provides an increase in efficiency, accuracy, and responsiveness in answering the complexity of the problems faced. However, the presence of AI in government decision making raises a number of legal questions that need to be taken into account. These issues are related to transparency, accountability, privacy, and fairness in applying the AI technology by the government. In the context of constitutional law, adjustments and improvements of regulations need to be made to accommodate the new dynamics introduced by digital transformation with the existence of AI. Therefore, it is important to undertake efforts to understand and predict the impact of AI in decision making by the government and its implications on constitutional law to direct the development of inclusive and sustainable public policy in this digital era.
References
Johnny Ibrahim, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Malang: Bayumedia, 2022), 47.
Black’s Law Dictionary, 12th ed. (St. Paul, MN: Thomson Reuters, 2023)
Cary Coglianese and David Lehr, “Regulating by Robot: Administrative Decision Making in the Machine-Learning Era,” Georgetown Law Journal 105, no. 5 (2023): 1147–1223.
Corinne Cath, “Governing Artificial Intelligence: Upholding Human Rights and Public Values,” Journal of Human Rights Practice 15, no. 1 (2023): 1–19.
Daniel J. Solove, Understanding Privacy, 3rd ed. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2023), 76.
European Commission, Proposal for a Regulation on Artificial Intelligence (AI Act) (Brussels: European Commission, 2023); Council of Europe, Recommendation CM/Rec(2020)1 on the Human Rights Impacts of Algorithmic Systems (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2020).
European Union, Artificial Intelligence Act (Proposed Regulation) (Brussels: European Commission, 2023).
European Union, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (Brussels: European Commission, 2016).
Government of Canada, Directive on Automated Decision-Making (Ottawa: Treasury Board Secretariat, 2023).
Ines Mergel, Noella Edelmann, and Nils Haug, “Defining Digital Transformation in Government,” Government Information Quarterly 39, no. 1 (2022): 101–118.
Johnny Ibrahim, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Malang: Bayumedia, 2022), 47.
Julie E. Cohen, Between Truth and Power: The Legal Constructions of Informational Capitalism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2023), 115.
Karen Yeung, “Algorithmic Regulation: A Critical Interrogation,” Regulation & Governance 16, no. 3 (2023): 437–457.
Karen Yeung, Andrew W. Murray, and Graeme Dinwoodie, “Comparative Perspectives on AI Regulation,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 72, no. 1 (2023): 1–23.
Lon L. Fuller, The Morality of Law, rev. Ed. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969), 39.
Luciano Floridi, Ethics, Governance, and AI: A Human-Centric Framework (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022), 201.
Masyhar, A., Maskur, M. A., Prasetyowati, S. R., Prihama, A. E., Priyono, R., & Alif, A. (2022). Digital transformation of youth movement for counter radicalism. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2573(1), 030010. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0109808.
Masyhar, A., et al., “Digital Transformation of Youth Movement for Counter Radicalism,” AIP Conference Proceedings 2573, no. 030010 (2022): 4, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0109808.
OECD, AI Governance and the Public Sector: Policy Frameworks for the Digital State (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023).
OECD, “OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence,” accessed May 3, 2024, https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles.
Peter Cane, “Accountability and Public Law in the Age of Algorithms,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 43, no. 2 (2022): 287–309.
Peter Cane and Mark Tushnet, The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022), 56.
Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2008 Nomor 58).
Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2022 Nomor 194).
Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 6).
United States Congress, Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2022 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Publishing Office, 2022).
Virginia Dignum, Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Designing AI for Human Values (Cham: Springer, 2022), 142.
Virginia Eubanks, Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2023), 88.
Yu-Che Chen, “Digital Government and Governance Research: A Review,” Government Information Quarterly 39, no. 4 (2022): 101–129.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
30339Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Firman Freaddy Busroh, Fatria Khairo, Aprila Niravita, Bhanu Prakash Nunna (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
