Deferred Prosecution Agreements in Indonesian Village Fund Corruption: Balancing Legal Certainty and Public Benefit

Elly Sudarti; Usman Usman; Andi Agus Salim; Riana Devi Lestari; Rizaldy Anggriawan

doi:10.15294/jllr.v7i2.33466

Authors

Elly Sudarti Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3820-5527
Usman Usman Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6713-8758
Andi Agus Salim Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5638-817X
Riana Devi Lestari Tubei District Court, Lebong, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6035-0615
Rizaldy Anggriawan Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7195-769X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v7i2.33466

Keywords:

Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs), Village Fund Corruption, Legal Certainty, Public Benefit

Abstract

This article employs a normative and comparative legal approach to analyze the legal challenges in addressing village fund corruption cases in Indonesia through the criminal justice system. In practice, prosecuting small-scale cases has prioritized legal certainty but has imposed disproportionate financial and temporal costs compared to the modest value of the offenses. Lengthy trials that end in criminal punishment undermine the cost–benefit principle in criminal justice process and conflict with the ideals of a swift, simple, and low-cost judicial process. Moreover, such proceedings often fail to restore state financial losses effectively. The novelty of this study lies in the proposed threshold-based Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) model, specifically designed to address cases of village fund corruption with limited financial losses. This study argues that resolving village fund corruption outside the courtroom, with a primary focus on restitution of state losses and active involvement of relevant stakeholders, offers greater benefits. Such an approach would better serve the state and society as victims, while also addressing the rehabilitation of offenders. Yet out-of-court settlement mechanisms currently lack a clear statutory basis, creating legal uncertainty in their application. A legal breakthrough is therefore needed by providing explicit regulation for alternative mechanism to resolve village fund corruption. One viable model is the DPAs, which enable prosecutors to suspend criminal proceedings in exchange for restitution, fines, or corrective measures. This study proposes incorporating the DPA model into Indonesia’s anti-corruption framework for cases involving losses of less than 150 million rupiah. Such reform would not only close the legal gap but also enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of efforts to recover state losses from small-scale village fund corruption.

References

Ali, Mahrus. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Korporasi. Jakarta: Grafindo, 2013.

Ananda, Diky, and Kurnia Ramdhana. Laporan Hasil Pemantauan Tren Korupsi Tahun 2023. Jakarta Selatan: Indonesia Crruotion Watch, 2024.

Anandya, Diky, and Lalola Easter. “Laporan Hasil Pemantauan Tren Penindakan Kasus Korupsi Tahun 2022 ‘Korupsi Lintas Trias Politika.’” Indonesia Corruption Watch, 2023, 1–55.

Andini, Orin Gusta, Nilasari Nilasari, and Andreas Avelino Eurian. “Restorative Justice in Indonesia Corruption Crime: A Utopia.” Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 31, no. 1 (2023): 72–90. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i1.24247.

Antari, Putu Eva Ditayani, and I. Kadek Budiadinata Satriatama Adnyana. “Deferred Prosecution Agreement Dalam Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 12, no. 1 (2023): 182–98. https://doi.org/10.34304/jf.v12i1.96.

Arifin, Ridwan. “Empowering International Cooperation’s Role in The Follow of Assets of Corruption’s Result.” Indonesian J. Int’l L. 11, no. 3 (2013): 414. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol11.3.505.

Ashady, Suheflihusnaini, and Aryadi Almau Dudy. “Problematika Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Penanganan Perkara Tindak Korupsi Dana Desa.” Unizar Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.36679/ulr.v6i1.34.

Balashov, Rakhmatulla, Oxana Filipets, and Svetlana Baimoldina. “Recovery of Stolen Assets from Abroad.” International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics 15, no. 5 (2023): 456–67. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESDF.2023.133188.

Bredemeier, Harry Charles, and Richard Manning Stephenson. The Analysis of Social Systems. Holt, Rinehart and Winston New York, 1962.

De Franco, Gus, R. Christopher Small, and Aida Sijamic Wahid. “Determinants of and Future Violations Following Deferred Prosecution and Non-Prosecution Agreements in Corporate Criminal Cases.” Contemporary Accounting Research 42, no. 2 (June 2025): 1271–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.13039.

Gunawan, Indra, and Yohanes Bahari. “Penyebab Tingginya Kasus Korupsi Dana Desa Dalam Sudut Pandang Teori Struktural Fungsional Talcot Parson (Study Literatur).” Journal Of Human And Education (JAHE) 4, no. 4 (2024): 609–18. https://doi.org/10.31004/jh.v4i4.1190.

Gusreyna, Lisa Aprilia. “Penerapan Konsep Deferred Prosecution Agreement Sebagai Gagasan Baru Dalam Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia.” Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan 2, no. 9 (2024): 41–50. https://doi.org/10.56282/jeft.v1i2.388.

Habib, Ali. “Application of Restorative Justice in Corruption Crime Cases as an Effort to Repay State Losses.” Corruptio 1, no. 1 (2020): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.25041/corruptio.v1i1.2069.

Hasbullah, Huala Adolf, and Sigid Suseno. “State Loss Settlement Policies in the Bank Indonesia Liquidity Assistance Case.” Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System 6, no. 1 (January 30, 2026): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.53955/JHCLS.V6I1.798.

Herman, Herman, Oheo Kaimuddin Haris, Sabrina Hidayat, Handrawan Handrawan, La Sensu, and Basri Baco. “Restorative Justice Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pengelolaan Dana Desa.” Halu Oleo Legal Research 4, no. 2 (2022): 219–30. https://doi.org/10.33772/holresch.v4i2.45.

Ibrahim, Metty Murni Wati, Jovita Irawati, Jamin Ginting, and Nelson Pardamean Purba. “Implementation of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) Concept in Handling Corporate Crime in the Laws of Indonesia and Other Countries.” Edunity Kajian Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan 3, no. 6 (2024): 353–61. https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v3i6.252.

Iqbal, Ahmad. “Penerapan Deferred Prosecution Agreement Di Indonesia Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ekonomi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Korporasi.” Jurnal Yuridis 7, no. 1 (2020): 191–208. https://doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v7i1.1867.

Januarsyah, Mas Putra Zenno, Ihwan Sutiawan, and Elisatris Gultom. “Reorientation of Corruption Criminal Act Removal in the Optimization of State Financial Loss Return Using Deferred Prosecution Agreement Concept.” 2nd International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies (ICILS 2019), 2019, 181–88. https://doi.org/10.2991/icils-19.2019.32.

Kadir, Yusrianto, and Roy Marthen Moonti. “Pencegahan Korupsi Dalam Pengelolaan Dana Desa.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 6, no. 3 (2018): 430–42. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v6i3.583.

Karim, M. Said. “The Concept of Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture As a Legal Policy in Assets Criminal Action of Corruption.” Legal Brief 11, no. 5 (2022): 2613–22. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v11i5.515.

Kerebungu, Ferdinand. Sosiologi Modern: Teori Struktural Fungsional Sampai Teori Hegemoni. Purbalingga: Eureka Media Aksara, 2023.

Khasyi, Muchammad Akmal Al, Dudik Djaja Sidarta, and Noenik Soekorini. “Karakteristik Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dana Desa Melalui Restorative Justice.” COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum (e-ISSN: 2776-1916) 4, no. 02 (2024): 71–84.

Lawyer, Moose Jaw Criminal Defence. “What Is a Plea Bargain in Canada.” 2022. https://moosejawlawyer.ca/basics-of-plea-bargain-canada/.

Nelson, Febby Mutiara. “Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara: Dapatkah Menggunakan Deferred Prosecution Agreement?” Simbur Cahaya 26, no. 2 (2020): 230–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/sc.v26i2.459.

———. Plea Bargaining Dan Deferred Prosecution Agreement Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2020.

Obe, Redentor G. A., and Indah Sri Utari. “Criminal Accountability for Corruption Actors in the Form of Concursus Realist.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 1, no. 2 (2020): 325–32. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v1i1.35451.

Pahlevi, Reza, and Yazid Bustomi. “Legal Reform against the Conflict of Norms in the Corruption Eradication Commission Law.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 4, no. 2 (2023): 255–70. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v4i2.65811.

Patmos, Yan. “Formulasi Non Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Di Indonesia Terkait Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dengan Pidana Asal Tindak Pidana Korupsi Guna Mewujudkan Nilai Kemanfaatan.” JHK: Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan 1, no. 1 (2023): 34–41. https://doi.org/10.61942/jhk.v1i1.48.

Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia 201/PMK.07/2022 Tentang Pengelolaan Dana Desa (2022).

Perez, Michel A. “The Rise and Globalization of Negotiated Settlements: How an American Procedure, the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA), Became a Transnational Key Tool to Fight Transnational Corporate Crimes.” Rule of Law and Anti-Corruption Center Journal 2020, no. 1 (2020): 4. https://doi.org/10.5339/rolacc.2020.4.

Prameswari, Anindytha Arsa, Gerhard Mangara, and Rifdah Rudi. “Deferred Prosecution Agreement: Corporate Criminal Liability Mechanism for Environmental Damage Through the Restorative Justice Paradigm.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 2, no. 12 (n.d.): 1200–1222. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v2i12.154.

Riyantika, Annisa. “Law Enforcement of Corruption Crimes Through the Restoration of State Finances Based on the Principles of Restorative Justice.” NEGREI: Academic Journal of Law and Governance 3, no. 1 (2023): 41–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.29240/negrei.v3i1.7193.

Roman, John, and Graham Farrell. “Cost-Benefit Analysis for Crime Prevention: Opportunity Costs, Routine Savings and Crime Externalities.” Crime Prevention Studies 14 (2002): 53–92.

Santiawan, I. Made. “Konsep Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Kertha Semaya 9(6), no. 6 (2021): 1044–45. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2021.v09.i06.p12.

Sinaga, Muhammad Ridho. “Konsep Deffered Prosecution Agreement (DPA) Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi Oleh Korporasi Di Indonesia.” De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 1 (2021): 80–97. https://doi.org/10.30596/dll.v6i1.5538.

Sudira, I. Ketut. Mediasi Penal Perkara Penelantaran Rumah Tangga. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2016.

Toegarisman, Adi. Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Paradigma Efiensi. Jakarta: Kompas Media Nusantara, 2016.

Triwijaya, Ach Faisol, Yaris Adhial Fajrin, and Chintya Meilany Nurrahma. “Dual Mediation: Penyelesaian Perkara Lingkungan Hidup Yang Melibatkan Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Melalui Pendekatan Restorative Justice.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 9, no. 2 (2020): 401–28. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i02.p14.

Usman, Rachmadi. Pilihan Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2013.

Usman, Usman, and Andi Najemi. “Mediasi Penal Di Indonesia.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 1 (2018): 65–83. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.1.65-83.

Wicaksono, Adi Hardiyanto. “Managing The Risk of The Corporate Taxpayers Crimes through Deferred Prosecution Agreement in Indonesia.” Journal of Entrepreneurship and Financial Technology 1, no. 2 (2022): 21–29. https://doi.org/10.56282/jeft.v1i2.388.

Winarta, Frans H. “Justice Collaborator Bukan Untuk Kolaborasi Politik.” Hukumonline, 2012. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/justice-collaborator-bukan-untuk-kolaborasi-politik-lt4fb35d0838a63/.

Wiranti, Yenni, and Ridwan Arifin. “Tantangan Dan Permasalahan Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia.” Kosmik Hukum 20, no. 1 (2020): 45–55. https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v20i1.%25203822.

Wiryawan, I. Wayan Gde, Lis Julianti, Putu Lantika Oka Permadhi, and Nurhidayah Binti Abdullah. “Integrated Spatial Governance for Sustainable Tourims in Bali.” Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues (JSDERI) 4, no. 1 (January 25, 2026): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.53955/JSDERI.V4I1.135.

Zhou, Yuan. “Raising the Deterrent Effect of the U.S. Deferred Prosecution Agreement: New Perspectives on the U.S. From the U.K. and Jersey.” Journal of Economic Criminology 10 (December 2025): 100189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2025.100189.