Formulating Criminal Law Policy for Social Conflict Resolution Based on North Maluku Indigenous Wisdom

Faisal Faisal; Absori Absori; Arief Budiono; Achmadi Achmadi; Reema  Bhattacharya

doi:10.15294/jllr.v7i2.41803

Authors

Faisal Faisal Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7016-3604
Absori Absori Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia Author
Arief Budiono Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia Author
Achmadi Achmadi Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya, Palangka Raya, Indonesia Author
Reema Bhattacharya Department of Law, Jagannath University, Bahadurgarh, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v7i2.41803

Keywords:

Criminal Law, Indigenous People, Social Conflict, Local Wisdom, North Maluku

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the local wisdom function of customary communities in North Maluku, Indonesia, as a conflict-resolution mechanism that emphasizes reconciliation before the formal criminal proceedings stage, to prevent excessive criminalization. This research analyzes customary values from four sultanates (Moloku Kie Raha), which may be integrated into criminal law policies as a form of legal reformation. Implementing ultimum remedium and restorative justice principles. This research employed a normative-empirical legal research method, drawing on approaches from legal sociology and legal pluralism. The analysis examined conflict-resolution mechanisms, with a focus on reconciliation in customary communities in North Maluku. Primary legal materials included the 1945 Constitution. Meanwhile, empirical data were obtained by identifying customary conflict resolution practices. Key Findings this research is North Maluku customary community’s local wisdom effectively functions as a pre-criminal conflict resolution through three main mechanisms which is orientation transformation from individual retaliation to the recovery of collective-spiritual balance, The use of customary oaths and rituals as instruments of moral evidence (such as in the Sopik tradition) as a moral evidencing instrument with a high level of compliance, and Deliberation through customary institutions, which emphasize reconciliation rather than the sanction of imprisonment. Implications of the findings for broader legal reform could address the sociological and philosophical aspects of customary conflicts. Thus, social harmony has been achieved, thereby strengthening restorative justice and the principle of ultimum remedium within Indonesia’s criminal justice system.

Author Biographies

Absori Absori, Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia

Professor of Law
Arief Budiono, Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia

Associate Professor of Law
Achmadi Achmadi, Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya, Palangka Raya, Indonesia

Associate Professor of Law
Reema Bhattacharya, Department of Law, Jagannath University, Bahadurgarh, India

Associate Professor of law

References

Achmadi, A., Sinung Mufti Hangabei, Khudzaifah Dimyati, and A. Absori. “Culture-Based Land Right Conflict Resolution Model A Case Study of the Dayak Tomun Indigenous People.” The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Cultural Studies 16, no. 2 (2021): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-008X/CGP/v16i02/1-10.

Achmadi, Achmadi, Khudzaifah Dimyati, Absori Absori, Sinung Mufti Hangabei, and Kaji Kelana Usop. “Concept Legal Culture of the Volkgeist-Based Customary Land Rights Conflict Resolution of the Dayak Tomun Community in Central Kalimantan Indonesia.” Asian Social Science 16, no. 1 (2019): 115. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v16n1p115.

Achmadi, Khudzaifah Dimyati, Absori, and Arief Budiono. “Cultural Implications of Dayak Tomun Indigenous Peoples In The Management Land Rights: A Case Study Of Lamandau, Central Kalimantan.” Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 8, no. 4 (2020): 530–36. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8452.

Aksar, Umar Dinata. “Penegakan Hukum Restorative Justice Pada Mediasi Penal Sebagai Upaya Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak.” Journal Equitable 7, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.37859/jeq.v7i1.3648.

Albersmeier, F. “Speciesism and Speciescentrism.” Ethic Theory Moral Practice 24 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-021-10168-6.

Ali, Zainuddin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.

Arafat, Yasir. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Dan Perubahan Ke I, II, III, Dan IV. Jakarta: Permata Press, 2014.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru) (Anthology of Criminal Law Policies (Development of Drafting the New Criminal Code)). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2008.

Bar-Tal, D. “From Interactable Conflict Through Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation: Psychological Analysis.” Political Psychology 21, no. 2 (2000): 351–63.

Bar-Tal, Daniel, and Gemma H. Bennink. “The Nature of Reconciliation as an Outcome and as a Process.” In From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation.” In From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation, edited by Yaacov Bar-Siman-Tov. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online, 2011. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195166439.003.0002.

Bayo, Relexi, Andy Usmina Wijaya, and Fikri Hadi. “Pengakuan Masyarakat Adat Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Wijaya Putra 1, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.38156/jihwp.v1i1.87.

Deslita, Hartiwingsih, and Rehnalemken Ginting. “Perbaikan Lingkungan Hidup Akibat Tindak Pidana Kebakaran Hutan Dan Lahan Oleh Korporasi Sebagai Upaya Pembangunan Berkelanjutan [Environmental Improvement Due To Criminal Acts Of Forest And Land Fires By Corporation As A Sustainable Development Effort].” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 8, no. 2 (2020): 372–80. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/ius.v8i2.747.

Gała, P. “Legal Protection of Traditional Agricultural Knowledge Relating to Genetic Resources.” Studia Iuridica Lublinensia 29, no. 2 (2020): 25–36. https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2020.29.2.25-36.

Handayani, E., and Suparno. “The Role of Customary Law in the Governance of Sustainable Agrarian Culture in Local Communities.” Corporate Law and Governance Review 5, no. 1 (2023): 29–37. https://doi.org/10.22495/clgrv5i1p3.

Haq, Hilman Syahrial, Achmadi, Sinung Mufti Hangabei, and Arief Budiono. “Community Mediation-Based Legal Culture in Resolving Social Conflicts of Communities Affected by the COVID-19 Pandemic in West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia.” Studia Iuridica Lublinensia 31, no. 2 (2022): 11–32. https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2022.31.2.11-32.

Isharyanto, Johan Erwin. “Eksistensi Dan Pengaturan Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Sebagai Subyek Hukum Tatanegara.” Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat 16, no. 1 (October 2018). https://doi.org/10.36356/hdm.v16i1.846.

Kejaksaan Tinggi Maluku Utara. “Pengajuan Restorative Justice Disetujui Oleh Jaksa Agung Muda Tindak Pidana Umum.” Kejati Malut, 2023.

Khalidah, Muhammad Nasir. “Penyelesaian Pembagian Warisan Di Kecamatan Simpang Ulim Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Adat.” Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan 8, no. 1 (July 2021): 33–49. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v8i1.2997.

Kuntadi, Kuntadi. “House of Restorative Justice as a Forum of Actualizing the Nation’s Culture in Solving Criminal Cases.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 22, no. 2 (2022): 323. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2022.22.2.3242.

Kurniawan, Ardian, Neni Triana, Maulidina Sari, Nurul Laylan Hasibuan, and Ana Ramadhona. “Hukum Adat Dan Nilai Restoratif: Kontekstualisasi Penyelesaian Konflik Sumbang Adat Di Jambi.” Masalah Masalah Hukum 53, no. 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.53.2.2024.111-122.

Kusumo, Bambang Ali, Rustambekov Islambek Rustambekovich, Yakubov Axtam Nusratilloyevich, and Xodjayev Baxshillo Kamolovich. “Corporate Crime Prevention Through Sustainable Governance and Regulatory Reform.” Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues 3, no. 3 (2025). https://doi.org/10.53955/jsderi.v3i3.168.

Kuswardani, Kuswardani, Marisa Kurnianingsih, and Andria Luhur Prakoso. “Spiritual Values of Customary Law.” Jurisprudence 8, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v8i1.6267.

Masyhar, Ali, Rohadhatul Aisy, Anis Widyawati, M. Azil Maskur, and Ali Murtadho. “Reclaiming the Unwritten: Living Law’s Prospects under Indonesia’s 2023 Penal Reform.” Jambe Law Journal 8, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.22437/home.v8i1.502.

Mubarok, Asnawi, Absori, Harun, and Sheela Jayabalan. “The Relationship Of State Law And Customary Law.” Jurnal Jurisprudence 13, no. 2 (2023): 188–204. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v13i2.2914.

Murhaini, Suriansyah, and Achmadi. “The Farming Management of Dayak People’s Community Based on Local Wisdom Ecosystem in Kalimantan Indonesia.” Heliyon 7, no. 12 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08578.

Rochaeti, Nur, and Rahmi Dwi Sutanti. “Kontribusi Peradilan Adat Dan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 47, no. 3 (2018): 198–214. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.47.3.2018.198-214.

Rochmayanto, Yanto, Dodik Ridho Nurrochmat, Bramasto Nugroho, Dudung Darusman, Arif Satria, Thorkil Casse, James Thomas Erbaugh, and Donny Wicaksono. “Devolution of Forest Management to Local Communities and Its Impacts on Livelihoods and Deforestation in Berau, Indonesia.” Heliyon 9, no. 5 (2023): e16115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16115.

Sastrawan, Rusydi, Usman Usman, and Herlambang Herlambang. “The Importance of Realizing Fair, Beneficial and Definitive Criminal Case Resolution Based on the Principles of Deliberation and Consensus.” JHK: Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan 1, no. 3 (2024): 46–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61942/jhk.v1i3.166.

Stefaniuk, M. “Environmental Awareness in Polish Society with Respect to Natural Resources and Their Protection (Overview of Survey Research).” Studia Iuridica Lublinensia 30, no. 2 (2021): 357–379. https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2021.30.2.357-379.

Sukedi, Mochamad, and I Nengah Nuarta. “Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Upaya Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Dalam Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 5, no. 2 (2024): 222–30. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.5.2.10415.222-230.

Sumaya, Pupu Sriwulan. “Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Sistem Hukum Adat Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora, Dan Politik 5, no. 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i2.3308.

Suratman, and Philips Dillah. Metode Penelitian Hukum (Method of Legal Research). Bandung: Alfabeta, 2015.

Udytama, I. Wayan Wahyu Wira, Mella Ismelina Farma Rahayu, and I. Wayan Gde Wiryawan. “The Illusion of Integrating Customary Law into Indonesia’s Contract Law System on the Communal Sanctions Policy Forum.” Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System 6, no. 1 (April 8, 2026): 222–53. https://doi.org/10.53955/JHCLS.V6I1.896.

Utari, Indah Sri, Rodiyah, Diandra Preludio Ramada, and Syukron Salam. “Relevance of Local Wisdom in Rural Judiciary for Indonesian Societies.” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, no. 4 (2020).

Yuni, Chika Takeisha, and Claressa. “Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Dengan Melibatkan Tokoh Adat/Pemangku Kepentingan: Sebuah Pendekatan Restoratif.” Jurnal Locus Penelitian Dan Pengabdian 3, no. 3 (2024). https://doi.org/10.58344/locus.v3i3.2531.