Reforming Tax Law Enforcement: The Role of Core Tax Administration System Digitalization and the Ultimum Remedium Principle
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i4.4297Keywords:
Legal Reform, CTAS, Tax Law, Ultimum Remedium, Law EnforcementAbstract
This study aims to analyze the impact of the digitalization of the Core Tax Administration System (CTAS) on tax law enforcement, with a particular focus on the application of the ultimum remedium principle. The research method employed is normative legal research, involving an in-depth analysis of tax law literature, relevant regulations, and case studies of CTAS implementation. The urgency of this research lies in addressing inefficiencies, inequities, and the lack of transparency in traditional tax law enforcement through the utilization of digital technology. The findings reveal that CTAS digitalization enhances efficiency, transparency, and data management in tax administration while strengthening law enforce ment processes through improved oversight and compliance. However, this digitalization also presents challenges, including data security risks, privacy concerns, and compliance with applicable regulations. The novelty of this research lies in integrating the ultimum remedium principle within the digital framework, advocating for a proportional approach to tax violations by prioritizing voluntary compliance and corrective measures before escalating to more severe enforcement actions. This study provides strategic contributions to legal policy development, offering essential insights for policymakers, legal practitioners, and system developers in designing a tax law enforcement system that is fair, transparent, and responsive to the demands of the digital era.
References
Abu Hassan, Norul Syuhada, Mohd Rizal Palil, Rosiati Ramli, and Ruhanita Maelah. “Does Compliance Strategy Increase Compliance? Evidence from Malaysia”. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance 15, no. 1 (2021): 1–14.
Ahyaruddin, M., and R. Akbar. "Indonesian Local Government's Accountability and Performance: The Isomorphism Institutional Perspective." Journal of Accounting and Investment 19, no. 1 (2018): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.190187.
Akbar, R., R. Pilcher, and B. Perrin. "Performance Measurement in Indonesia: The Case of Local Government." Pacific Accounting Review 24 (2012).
Chakravarty, P. "The Myth of India’s Low Income Tax Base." The Hindustan Times, September 2, 2020. https://www. Hindustan times.com/analysis/the-myth-of-indias-low-income-tax-base/ story-UlN3FLG6N NzQilt09BSXnN.htm.
Hiariej, Edward Omar Sharif. "Prinsip-prinsip Lex Specialis Sistema tis dan Hukum Pidana Pajak." Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 21, no. 1 (2021): 1–15.
Kilonzo, Susan Mbula, and Ayobami Ojebode. "Research Methods for Public Policy." In Public Policy and Research in Africa, edited by Emmanuel Remi Aiyede and Beatrice Muganda, 63–85. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia 2023. UU No. 1 Tahun 2023. Online at https://peraturan.bpk.go. id/Details/ 234935/uu-no-1-tahun-2023
Lauer, Robert H. Perspectives on Social Change. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2003.
Magnis-Suseno, Franz. 1Power & Morals. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1099.
Memani, R. 2020, "The Future of Tax Reforms Is Based on Trust and Tech," The Mint, August 14, p. 13. https:// www. livemint. com/ opinion/online-views/the-future-of-tax-reforms-is-based-on trust-and-tech11597367143771.html#:~:text=Together%20 with%20faceless%20appeals%2C%20to,and%20resources%20of%20the%20taxpayers.
Mishra, P. R. "GST Has Increased India’s Reliance on Indirect Taxes, Hurting the Poor," The Wire, July 14, 2021. https://thewire.in/ economy/gst-india-indirected-taxes-inequality.
Patton, J. M. 1992. "Accountability and Governmental Financial Reporting." Financial Accountability and Management 8 (3): 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.1992.tb00436.x.
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat. 2020. No: 334/ Pid.Sus/ 2020/PN Jakarta Barat (8 Juli 2020).
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat. 2020. No: 394/ Pid.Sus/ 2020/PN Jakarta Barat (8 Juli 2020).
Putusan Kasasi. 2012. No: 2239K/PID.SUS/2012 (18 Desember 2012).
PwC dan World Bank Group. 2020. Paying Taxes 2020: The Changing Landscape of Tax Policy and Administration Across 190 Economies. Diakses dari https://www. doingbusiness. org/ content/ dam/ doing Business/ pdf/ db2020/ Paying Taxes 2020. pdf.
Roberts, J., and R. Scapens. "Accounting Systems and Systems of Accountability: Understanding Accounting Practices in Their Organisational Contexts." Accounting, Organizations and Society 1 no. 4 (1985): 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682 (85) 9000 5-4.
Roeslan Saleh. Sifat Melawan Hukum dari Tindak Pidana. Jakarta: Aksara Baru, 1987.
Romzek, B. S., and M. J. Dubnick. "Accountability in the Public Sector: Lessons from the Challenger Tragedy." Public Administration Review 47, no. 3 (1987): 227.
Roy, E. "Replace Income Tax Act with Direct Taxes Code: Chidam baram in Rajya Sabha." The Indian Express, March 29, 2022. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/replace-income-tax-act-with-direct-taxes-code-chidambaram-7841703.
Schwartz, R., and R. Sulitzeanu-Kenan. "Managerial Values and Accountability Pressures: Challenges of Crisis and Disaster." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14, no. 1 (2004): 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh005.
Scott, W. R. "The Adolescence of Institutional Theory." Adminis trative Science Quarterly 32, no. 4 (1987): 493. https:// doi.org/ 10. 2307/ 2392880.
Scott, W. R. "Approaching Adulthood: The Maturing of Institutional Theory." Theory and Society 37, no. 5 (2008): 427–442. https: //doi. org/10.1007/s11186-008-9067-z.
Sinclair, A. "The Chameleon of Accountability: Forms and Discourses." Accounting, Organizations and Society 20, no. 2 (1995): 219–237.
Soejadi, R. Makna Keadilan Menurut Pandangan Filsuf Klasik. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Filsafat UGM, 1989.
Undang-Undang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan Indonesia 2021. Online at https:// peraturan. bpk.go.id/ Details/ 185162/uu-no-7-tahun-2021.
Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia 1981. Online at https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/47041/uu-no-8-tahun -1981
Undang-Undang Ketentuan Umum dan Tata Cara Perpajakan Indonesia 1983 sebagaimana Terakhir Diubah pada 2023. Online at https:// peraturan. bpk.go.id/ Details/246 523/uu-no-6-tahun-2023
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2009 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2008 tentang Perubahan Keempat Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2008 tentang Ketentuan Umum dan Tata Cara Perpajakan Menjadi Undang-Undang.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2007 tentang Perubahan Ketiga Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 1983 tentang Ketentuan Umum dan Tata Cara Perpajakan.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2021 tentang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan.
Verbeeten, F. H. M. "Performance Management Practices in Public Sector Organizations." Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21, no. 3 (2008): 427–454. https://doi.org/10.11 08/095135 70810863996.
Wang, X. "Assessing Administrative Accountability: Results from a National Survey." Public Administration Review 32 (September 2002): 350–370. https://doi. org/ 10.1177/ 027507 4002032003005.
Zucker, L. G. "Institutional Theories of Organization." Annual Review of Sociology 13, no. 1 (1987): 443–464. https:// doi.org/10.1146/ annurev.so.13.080187.002303.
Downloads
Article ID
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Bambang Djinarto, Slamet Suhartono, Syofyan Hadi, Sri Setyadji, Juan Nickalus (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
