Strengthening the Patent Gatekeeper: The Mandatory Disclosure of Origin in Indonesia’s Intellectual Property Regime

Efridani Lubis; Nurwidiatmo Nurwidiatmo; Heru Widodo; Prastopo Prastopo; Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol

doi:10.15294/jllr.v7i3.48740

Authors

Efridani Lubis Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam As-Syafiiyah, Jakarta, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3970-5406
Nurwidiatmo Nurwidiatmo Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam As-Syafiiyah, Jakarta, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0429-8039
Heru Widodo Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam As-Syafiiyah, Jakarta, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7570-6227
Prastopo Prastopo Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Militer, Jakarta, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1304-9262
Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5671-7367

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v7i3.48740

Keywords:

Mandatory Disclosure of Origin, Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge, Patent Law Reform, Distributive Justice

Abstract

The enactment of Law No. 65 of 2024 has fundamentally transformed the legal status of Mandatory Disclosure of Origin (MDO) within Indonesia’s patent regime. While previous studies have primarily examined MDO as a mechanism for preventing biopiracy and facilitating access and benefit-sharing, limited attention has been paid to its evolving role as a substantive patentability requirement and its philosophical foundation within Indonesia’s legal system. This article addresses that gap by examining how Article 26 of the amended Patent Law redefines the disclosure of genetic resources and traditional knowledge from a procedural obligation into a substantive legal mandate. Using a statutory, conceptual, and comparative legal approach, this study analyzes the transformation of Article 26 in light of Law No. 65 of 2024, the Nagoya Protocol, and the 2024 WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge. The analysis further employs an axiological perspective to evaluate the compatibility of MDO with the constitutional values embodied in Pancasila. The findings demonstrate that the amended Patent Law significantly strengthens the gatekeeping function of the Indonesian patent system by linking patent validity to transparency regarding the origin and lawful acquisition of genetic resources and traditional knowledge. The reform establishes a legal framework that integrates Prior Informed Consent (PIC), Access and Benefit-Sharing (ABS), and post-grant accountability mechanisms, thereby enhancing protection against biopiracy. Furthermore, the study finds that the strengthened MDO regime reflects a shift from a predominantly individualistic intellectual property paradigm toward a distributive justice model grounded in the Second and Fifth Principles of Pancasila. This article argues that the strengthened gatekeeper model represents a form of decolonial intellectual property reform that balances private innovation with collective rights, reinforces national sovereignty over biological resources, and provides a normative foundation for equitable benefit-sharing in the emerging bioeconomy.

References

Abbott, Ryan. The Reasonable Robot: Artificial Intelligence and the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.

Ali, M. S. Filsafat Hukum: Menggali Hakikat Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenada Media. 2021.

Amalia, Marina Eka and Parulian Paidi Aritonang., “Commercial Material Transfer Agreement: Salah Satu Solusi Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Peneliti Indonesia”, UNES Law Review, Volume 5, Issue 4 (2023): https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.

Becker, Gary S. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Political Economy 76, no. 2 (1968): 169–217.

Chiarolla C. “Intellectual Property from a Global Environmental Law Perspective: Lessons from Patent Disclosure Requirements for Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge”. Transnational Environmental Law. 8(3) (2019): 503-521. http:// doi.org/10.1017/S2047102519000165.

Daniel F. Robinson and Margaret T. Raven. "Ethical and Equitable Access and Benefit-Sharing: Indigenous Knowledge and Genetic Resources in Global Governance," Environmental Policy and Law 50, No. 4-5 (2020): 311–26. https://doi.org/10.3233/EPL-200227.

De Filippi, Primavera, and Aaron Wright. Blockchain and the Law: The Rule of Code. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2018.

Drahos, Peter. A Philosophy of Intellectual Property. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing, 1996.

Drahos, Peter and John Braithwaite. Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? London: Earthscan, 2002.

Dutfield, Graham. Protecting Traditional Knowledge: Pathways to the Future. Geneva: ICTSD, 2018.

Hou, Yun, I.P.L. Png, and Xi Xiong. “When stronger patent law reduces patenting: Empirical evidence”, Strategic Management Journal, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3464.

Isharyanto. Teori Hukum: Suatu Pengantar dengan Pendekatan Tematik Sukoharjo: Absolute Media. 2020.

Jing Lin, Xiyang Cao, Xiaoqi Dong, Yunbi An. “Environmental regulations, supply chain relationships, and green technological innovation”, Journal of Corporate Finance, vol. 88, October 2024, 102645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2024.102645.

Kamau, Evanson C., and Gerd Winter. Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and the Law: Solutions for Access and Benefit Sharing. London: Earthscan, 2013.

Kreiken, B. and Asveld, L. “The promise of access and benefit-sharing is met through holistic policy reform: Insights from Colombia’s genetic diversity and innovation landscape during COP16”, Genetic Resources, 6 (12), (2025): 39–56. https://doi.org/10.46265/genresj.APNR6909.

Lawson, Charles, and Michelle Rourke. “Digital sequence information as a marine genetic resource under the proposed UNCLOS legally binding instrument”, Marine Policy, Volume 122, December 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103878.

Lubis, Efridani. “Protection and Utilization of Indonesia Genetic Resources: Disentangle of Regime Complex”, Global Conference on Business and Social Science Vol 11/1, (2020). 116-122. https://gcbss.org/CIMSSR2020THAILAND/CIMSSR-00431.html.

Mashiyane, Dina. “Looting of Indigenous Knowledge Systems through Patents and Intellectual Property Policies”, in book: The Afrocentricity Trajectories of Looting in South Africa. Publisher: Lexington Books, 2023.

Mas Rahmah, Nurul Barizah and Sam Blay, “Ensuring Disclosure of Origin of Genetic Resources in Patent Applications: Indonesia’s efforts to Combat Biopiracy”, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol 25, January-March 2020: 40-56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348592981_Ensuring_Disclosure_of_Origin_of_Genetic_Resources_in_Patent_Applications_Indonesia’s_efforts_to_Combat_Biopiracy

Masrur, Devica Rully. “Biopiracy and the Regulatory Framework for Material Transfer Agreements in Indonesia, Law Reform, 20(1), (2024): 76-105. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v20i1.57001.

Maulida, Aldehita Purnasanti, Indah Sri Utari, Yustina Dhian Novita, and Abu Bakar Munir. “Navigating Indonesia’s Economic Crossroads: The Future of State-Owned Enterprises in a Transforming National Economy.” Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services 8, no. 1 (2026): 415–52. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v8i1.55219.

Merges, Robert P. Justifying Intellectual Property. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011.

Muhaimin. “Integrating Biodiversity Governance and Intellectual Property Protection in Indonesia.” Hasanuddin Law Review 9, no. 2 (2023): 145–162.

Notonagoro. Pancasila Dasar Falsafah Negara. Jakarta: Bina Aksara, 1988.

Posey, Darrell A., and Graham Dutfield. Beyond Intellectual Property: Toward Traditional Resource Rights for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 1996.

Perron-Welch, Frédéric. “Bio-Based Innovation and the Global Patent System: Exploring the WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge”, GRUR International, XX(XX), (2024): 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikae133.

Prisandani, Ulya Yasmine. “Balancing Intellectual Property Protection and Release of Exclusive Rights for Sustainability Purposes”, Journal of Intellectual Property (JIPRO) 7.2, (2024): 120. https://doi.org/10.20885/jipro.vol.7iss2.art2.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.

Ramada, Diandra Preludio, and Indah Sri Utari. “Unveiling the Surge in Corruption: A Menacing Threat to Indonesia’s Stability in Anti-Corruption Law Reform.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 5, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.vol5i1.2092.

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.

Rideng, I Wayan, et. al., “Dimensions of Water Resources Regulation in Philosophy of Justice and Human Rights Perspective”, Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, Vol 7 No 1 (2022): A Discourse of Justice and Legal Protection in Domestic and Global Perspective. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i1.53820.

Robinson, Daniel F., and Margaret T. Raven. “Ethical and Equitable Access and Benefit-Sharing: Indigenous Knowledge and Genetic Resources”, Global Governance. Environmental Policy and Law 50, No. 4-5 (2022): 311–26.

Robinson, W. Keith. “Artificial Intelligence and Access to the Patent System”, Nevada Law Journal, 21 NEV. L.J. (2021): 729-778. https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/.

Roestamy, Martin. Mencari Ilmu Pengetahuan Hukum (Pendekatan Metodologi, Teori, dan Filsafat Hukum). Bogor: Unida Press, 2024.

Soepomo. Sistem Hukum di Indonesia Sebelum Perang Dunia II. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2000.

Stuart J. Smyth, Diego M. Macall, Peter W. B. Phillips, Jeremy de Beer. “Implications of biological information digitization: Access and benefit sharing of plant genetic resources”, The Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 March 2020 https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12151.

Suadi, Amran. Filsafat Hukum: Refleksi Filsafat Pancasila, Hak Asasi Manusia, dan Etika, Cetakan ke-3, Rawamangun: Kencana, 2022.

Susanti, Susi, Hieronymus Soerjatisnanta, Ria Wierma Putri. “Legal Implications Access and Benefit-Sharing of Genetic Resources to Supporting the SDGs”, Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (JLPH) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): https://dinastires.org/JLPH/article/view/1879.

Topildiev, Bakhromjon Rakhimjonovich, Yunus Mukhitdinovich Khodjiev, Nuriddin Aktam ugli Shermatov, Asalya Sultonmurodovna Kayumova, and Dildora Elmuradovna Abdullaeva. “Legal Challenges and Policy Implications for Property Rights Protection in Uzbekistan.” Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System 6, no. 1 (2026): 116–46.

Utari, Indah Sri, Ridwan Arifin, and Ahmad Zaharuddin Sani Ahmad Sabri. “Why Did a Five-Year-Old Toddler Become a Victim of Murder? A Criminological and Legal Perspective.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies 8, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v8i2.48591.

Wahyudi, Dedi, Bambang Tri Bawono, Bahtiyar Efendi. “Indonesia’s Palm Oil Plantation Regulations for Promoting Community Protection and Justice”, Contrarius, Vol. 2, No. 3, October 2026: https://doi.org/10.53955/contrarius.v2i3.296.

World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge. Geneva: WIPO, 2024.