Judicial Gatekeeping in Electoral Justice: The Constitutional Court’s Dismissal Procedure in Indonesian Regional Election Disputes

Simplexius Asa; Marlyani Anita Seran; Moh. Imam Gusthomi; Abu Bakar Munir

doi:10.15294/jllr.v7i3.49871

Authors

Simplexius Asa Faculty of Law, Universitas Nusa Cendana, Kupang, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3033-9278
Marlyani Anita Seran Faculty of Law, Universitas Nusa Cendana, Kupang, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6530-798X
Moh. Imam Gusthomi Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1029-1123
Abu Bakar Munir Faculty of Law, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v7i3.49871

Keywords:

Electoral Justice, Dismissal Procedure, Constitutional Adjudication, Judicial Discretion, Legal Certainty

Abstract

Electoral dispute resolution has become a critical pillar for safeguarding democratic legitimacy in Indonesia, particularly as regional head elections have led to an increasing number of legal disputes. In the 2024–2025 electoral cycle alone, the Constitutional Court registered 309 lawsuits against regional election results, but only a small fraction made it past the dismissal stage. Although normatively justified as a means of ensuring efficiency under strict constitutional deadlines, the dismissal procedure has evolved into a decisive gatekeeping function whose application significantly shapes access to constitutional justice. However, concerns are growing about inconsistencies in judicial reasoning, disparities between similar cases, and the potential erosion of legal certainty, particularly evident in conflicting rulings in disputes such as Boven Digoel and Belu. This study critically examines the philosophical–juridical basis and practical implementation of the dismissal procedure in electoral adjudication in Indonesia. Drawing on doctrinal analysis and empirical examination of selected cases, this study investigates whether the mechanism fulfills its normative purpose while maintaining justice, certainty, and equality before the law. The findings reveal structural tensions between procedural efficiency and substantive justice, highlighting how the exercise of judicial discretion at the dismissal stage can both enable and limit electoral accountability. The study contributes to constitutional scholarship by reframing dismissal as a judicial gatekeeping doctrine and offering analytical criteria, such as doctrinal predictability, procedural transparency, and access optimization for assessing coherence and transparency in screening practices. Building on these criteria, the study proposes concrete measures for legal reform: standardized, publicly reasoned dismissal templates; inter-panel doctrinal harmonization guidelines; and a state-supported legal aid scheme for petitioners from resource-limited regions, offering the Constitutional Court, lawmakers, and election administrators an actionable roadmap for strengthening procedural safeguards, enhancing public trust, and promoting more consistent standards in electoral dispute resolution.

References

Abou-Chadi, Tarik. “Electoral Competition, Political Risks, and Parties’ Responsiveness to Voters’ Issue Priorities.” Electoral Studies 55 (2018): 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.08.012.

Ali, Md. Hossain, Fazlur Rahman, Rownok Ara, and Md Moazzem Hossain. “Corporate Political Connections and Earnings Management in a Unique Regulatory Setting: Do Audit Quality and Family Control Matter?” Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies 16, no. 2 (2026): 262–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-07-2025-0379.

Anderlini, Luca, Leonardo Felli, and Alessandro Riboni. “Legal Efficiency and Consistency.” European Economic Review 121 (2020): 103323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.103323.

Artés, Joaquín, Ignacio Jurado, and Fernando De la Cuesta. “Roads and Votes: The Electoral Consequences of Local Connectivity Improvement.” European Journal of Political Economy 94 (2026): 102869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2026.102869.

Ayub, Ali Md., Ferdous Robayet Syed, and Haiqing Peng. “Breaking Barriers: The Admissibility of Forensic Evidence in US Courts and the Struggles with Cutting-Edge Science.” Science & Justice 65, no. 6 (2025): 101355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2025.101355.

Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi, Amir Ilyas, Abdul Kholiq, Handina Sulastrina Bakhtiar, and Ahmad Yusup. “The Role of Forensic Evidence in Indonesia’s Criminal Justice.” Forensic Science International: Synergy 12 (2026): 100693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2026.100693.

Birnir, Jóhanna Kristín, Noory Okthariza, Khoirunnisa Nur Agustyati, and Heroik M Pratama. “The Patriarchy in the Parties: Voters, Parties and Women’s Electoral Fortunes in the 2024 Legislative Election in Indonesia.” Electoral Studies 95 (2025): 102938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102938.

Brandenburg, Heinz, and Maarja Lühiste. “The Myth of Compensatory Effects: How Party Organisation Shapes Women’s Representation in Dual-Candidacy Mixed Electoral Systems.” Electoral Studies 100 (2026): 103057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2026.103057.

Daxecker, Ursula, and Neeraj Prasad. “Preaching to the Converted: Misinformation and Voter Preferences in Election Campaigns.” Electoral Studies 98 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2025.103003.

Erlich, Aaron, Nicholas Kerr, and Saewon Park. “Weaponizing Post-Election Court Challenges: Assessing Losers’ Motivations.” Electoral Studies 86 (2023): 102676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102676.

Faisal, Faisal, Absori Absori, Arief Budiono, and Achmadi Achmadi. “Formulating Criminal Law Policy for Social Conflict Resolution Based on North Maluku Indigenous Wisdom.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 7, no. 2 (2026): 833–62. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v7i2.41803.

Gerzso, Thalia. “Judicial Resistance during Electoral Disputes: Evidence from Kenya.” Electoral Studies 85 (2023): 102653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102653.

Habiye, Yusto Lucian, Rajendra Parsad Gunputh, Sameerchand Pudaruth, and Cornel Kinanila Mtaki. “Evolving Jurisprudence on Unfair Prejudice Claims in Tanzania: A Review of Legislative Efficiency in Shareholder Protection and Judicial Perspective.” International Journal of Law and Management, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-11-2025-0480.

Hadfield, Gillian K. “The Levers of Legal Design: Institutional Determinants of the Quality of Law.” Journal of Comparative Economics 36, no. 1 (2008): 43–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2007.10.002.

Hamzah, Rosyidi, Fadhel Adinda, Teguh Prasja, Mohd Shukur, and Dodo Wiriatma. “Reforming the Roots: Can Legal Challenges Transform the Crude Palm Oil Industry in Indonesia and Malaysia?” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 7 (2026): 113–60. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v7i1.22161.

Handayani, Sri. State Civil Apparatus Neutrality Policy in General Elections : Lessons from Several Countries. Vol. 6, 2026.

Hasmin, Nor Akhmal, and Vita Cita Emia Tarigan. “Promoting and Regulating Cellular Agriculture in Malaysia and Indonesia: Analysing the Adequacy of the Regulatory Framework.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 7, no. 1 (2026): 377–414. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v7i2.32504.

Hayo, Bernd, and Stefan Voigt. “Determinants of Constitutional Change: Why Do Countries Change Their Form of Government?” Journal of Comparative Economics 38, no. 3 (2010): 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2010.07.007.

Kotamäki, Niina, George Arhonditsis, Turo Hjerppe, Kari Hyytiäinen, Olli Malve, Otso Ovaskainen, Tiina Paloniitty, et al. “Strategies for Integrating Scientific Evidence in Water Policy and Law in the Face of Uncertainty.” Science of The Total Environment 931 (2024): 172855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172855.

Kusdarini, Eny, Anang Priyanto, Sri Hartini, and Suripno Suripno. “Roles of Justice Courts: Settlement of General Election Administrative Disputes in Indonesia.” Heliyon 8, no. 12 (2022): e11932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11932.

Landess, Jacqueline. “Civil and Constitutional Rights of Adjudicated Youth.” Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America 25, no. 1 (2016): 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2015.08.004.

Lee, Don S, and Fernando Casal Bértoa. “Does Institutional Design Matter? Constitutional Regime Types and Party System Closure in Asia.” World Development 200 (2026): 107217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107217.

Li, Pan, Yun Zhong, and Han Yan. “The Constructive Interaction between Executive and Judicial Powers: Government-Court Coordination and Corporate Investment Efficiency.” Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 22, no. 1 (2026): 100539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2026.100539.

Maulida, Aldehita Purnasanti, Indah Sri Utari, Yustina Dhian Novita, and Abu Bakar Munir. “Navigating Indonesia’s Economic Crossroads: The Future of State-Owned Enterprises in a Transforming National Economy.” Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services 8, no. 1 (2026): 415–52. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v8i1.55219.

Mitchell, Don. “How to Turn a Union Organizer into a Cable Junction Box: Union Access to Workers, the Property Right to Exclude, and the United States Supreme Court’s Alchemical Geographical Imagination.” Political Geography 117 (2025): 103260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103260.

Niblett, Anthony. “Tracking Inconsistent Judicial Behavior.” International Review of Law and Economics 34 (2013): 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2012.10.003.

Nugroho, Harry, Indah Sri Utari, Irawaty Irawaty, Satrio Sakti Nugroho, Souad Ezzerouali, and Tajudeen Sanni. “Who Will Advocate? The Impact of Decision 93/PUU-XX/2022 on Article 433 Civil Code Amendments for Disability Rights and Legal Protection.” Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services 7, no. 1 (2025): 95–120.

Owen, Gigi. “Equity and Justice as Central Components of Climate Change Adaptation.” One Earth 4, no. 10 (2021): 1373–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.09.008.

Raharjanti, Natalia Widiasih, Adhitya Sigit Ramadianto, Ronald Leonardo, Aisha Emilirosy Roekman, Claudia Gunawan, Rizky Farandi Mubasir, Nadia Rahmadiani Nugrahadi, and Dyta Ghezhanny William. “Mental Disorder in the Courtroom: Challenges for Legal Practice in Low-Resource Criminal Justice System: A Qualitative Analysis from Indonesia.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 108 (2026): 102254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2026.102254.

RI, Mahkamah Konstitusi. “Laporan Tahunan Mahkamah Konstituasi,” 2025.

Rosenberg-Lavi, Shira. “From Closed Adoption to Post-Adoption Contact as Child Protection: A Judicial Typology Model.” Children and Youth Services Review 187 (2026): 109085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.109085.

Saymour, Isra. “Loot, Legitimacy, and Provenance: Intermediaries and the Legitimation of Looted Cultural Objects.” Poetics 113 (2025): 102062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2025.102062.

Sonkar, Aman. “Breathing Unequally: Climate Justice and the Right to Health.” Social Sciences & Humanities Open 13 (2026): 102969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102969.

Sudarti, Elly, Usman Usman, Andi Agus Salim, Riana Devi Lestari, and Rizaldy Anggriawan. “Deferred Prosecution Agreements in Indonesian Village Fund Corruption: Balancing Legal Certainty and Public Benefit.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 7, no. 2 (2026): 903–50. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v7i2.33466.

Suntana, Ija, and Tedi Priatna. “Four Obstacles to the Quality of Constitutional Law Learning in Indonesia.” Heliyon 9, no. 1 (2023): e12824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12824.

Susetyo, Heru, Reisa Arimbi, Morten Andersen, and Shr-Jie Wang. “Analysis of Social Networks and Peer Contagion in Terrorism-Related Offences in Indonesia.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 7 (January 2026): 203–50. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v7i1.40357.

Uhl, Andrzej, and Kamil Mamak. “Are Sentencing Disparities Unavoidable? Lessons from Centralized Judicial Training.” Journal of Criminal Justice 102 (2026): 102582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102582.

Utari, Indah Sri, Ridwan Arifin, and Ahmad Zaharuddin Sani Ahmad Sabri. “Why Did a Five-Year-Old Toddler Become a Victim of Murder? A Criminological and Legal Perspective.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies 8, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v8i2.48591.

Utari, Indah Sri, Muhammad Azil Maskur, Benny Sumardiana, Diandra Preludio Ramada, and Nizamuddin Alias. “Illegal Nickel Mining in Protected Forests: Challenges in Whistleblower and Justice Collaborator Protection in Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal of Environmental Law and Sustainable Development 4, no. 2 (2025): 341–74. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijel.v4i2.38220.

Utari, Indah Sri, Diandra Preludio Ramada, Salman Alfarisi, and Nizamuddin Alias. “A Criminological Perspective on Corruption as a Catalyst of Economic Breakdown: Socio-Legal Challenges in Indonesian Environmental Governance.” Jambe Law Journal 9, no. 1 (2026): 205–47. https://doi.org/10.22437/jmj4ac47.

Utari, Indah Sri, Diandra Preludio Ramada, Ridwan Arifin, and Robert Brian Smith. “Legal Protection for Children as Victims of Economic Exploitation: Problems and Challenges in Three Major ASEAN Countries (Indonesia, Vietnam and Philippines).” Lex Scientia Law Review 7, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v7i2.68301.

Utari, Indah Sri, Diandra Preludio Ramada, Ubaidillah Kamal, Ratih Damayanti, and Nizamuddin Alias. “The Digital Sanctuary: Forging Legal And Ethical Frameworks For Interfaith Coexistence Online.” Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society 4, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/10.15294/ciils.v4i2.35309.

Valencia, Jeralyn, Fajar Sugianto, Atsuko Yamamoto, Jerry Shalmont, and Suryo Nadya. “Hybrid Authorship and Legal Uncertainty: Rethinking Intellectual Property for AI-Generated and NFT Art.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 7, no. 2 (2026): 987–1082. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v7i2.32504.

Waterpauw, Paulus, Arthur Josias Simon Runturambi, A Hanief Saha Ghafur, and Kosuke Mizuno. “Pancasila Framework for Resolving Digital Hybrid Conflicts in Jayapura.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 7, no. 2 (2026): 621–74. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v7i2.46898.

Yakubov, Aybek, Nargiza Raimova, Uktamjon Tukhtaev, Mavludbek Ismoilov, and Shokhrukh Gulomov. “Legal Protection for Individual Entrepreneurs Through Regulatory Reform in Uzbekistan.” Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System 6 (July 2026): 106–34. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v6i2.1008.

Zhang, Tianyi, and Yuanli Pan. “Judicial System Reform, Agency Costs, and Audit Pricing.” Finance Research Letters 85 (2025): 108129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108129.