Redesigning Legislation in the Era of Industry 4.0: Toward a Technology-Responsive Regulatory Framework in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v7i4.63944Keywords:
Industry 4.0, Legislative Design, Legislative Reform, Technology-Responsive Regulation, Adaptive RegulationAbstract
The rapid development of Industry 4.0 technologies, including artificial intelligence, big data, the Internet of Things, automation, blockchain, and digital platforms, has fundamentally transformed social, economic, and governmental activities and generated increasingly complex regulatory challenges. These technological transformations require legislation to move beyond conventional and predominantly reactive approaches toward a more adaptive, anticipatory, and technology-responsive regulatory design. In Indonesia, significant reforms have been introduced to improve the legislative process, including recognizing electronic law-making and strengthening meaningful public participation. Nevertheless, the existing legislative framework remains insufficiently responsive to the speed, complexity, uncertainty, and cross-sectoral nature of technological change. The central problem is therefore not merely the absence of technology-related regulation, but the inadequacy of the existing legislative design to anticipate technological developments, maintain regulatory coherence, incorporate technological expertise, and ensure continuous public participation and regulatory evaluation. This study examines the need to redesign legislation in the era of Industry 4.0 and to formulate a technology-responsive regulatory framework for Indonesia. Using a socio-legal approach, the study examines legislation, regulatory policies, institutional practices, and the interaction between technological transformation and legal development. The findings show that Indonesia needs to shift from a reactive legislative model to an adaptive, anticipatory model characterized by technological foresight, evidence-based lawmaking, regulatory coherence, interdisciplinary expertise, meaningful digital participation, regulatory experimentation, and continuous monitoring and evaluation. Accordingly, this study proposes a technology-responsive legislative framework that integrates technological assessment into the legislative cycle, strengthens institutional and expert capacity, facilitates inclusive digital participation, and establishes mechanisms for periodic regulatory review. The proposed framework supports a more adaptive, coherent, participatory, and future-oriented legislative system that can respond to technological transformation while safeguarding legal certainty, accountability, public interests, and fundamental rights.
References
Ahern, Deirdre. “The New Anticipatory Governance Culture for Innovation: Regulatory Foresight, Regulatory Experimentation and Regulatory Learning.” European Business Organization Law Review 26 (2025): 241–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-025-00348-7.
Bagby, John W., and Nizan G. Packin. “RegTech and Predictive Lawmaking: Closing the RegLag between Prospective Regulated Activity and Regulation.” Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review 10, no. 2 (2021): 127–61. https://doi.org/10.36639/mbelr.10.2.regtech.
Black, Julia. “Decentring Regulation: Understanding the Role of Regulation and Self-Regulation in a ‘Post-Regulatory’ World.” Current Legal Problems 54, no. 1 (2001): 103–46.
Black, Julia. “Regulatory Innovation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Regulation, edited by Robert Baldwin, Martin Cave, and Martin Lodge, 307–26. Oxford University Press, 2010.
Bonnín Roca, Jaime, Parth Vaishnav, M. Granger Morgan, Joana Mendonça, and Erica Fuchs. “When Risks Cannot Be Seen: Regulating Uncertainty in Emerging Technologies.” Research Policy 46, no. 7 (2017): 1215–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.010.
Brass, Irina, and Jesse H. Sowell. “Adaptive Governance for the Internet of Things: Coping with Emerging Security Risks.” Regulation & Governance 15, no. 4 (2021): 1092–1110. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12343.
Brownsword, Roger. “Law, Technology and Society: Re-imagining the Regulatory Environment.” Law, Innovation and Technology 3, no. 1 (2011): 1–18.
Coglianese, Cary. “The Challenge of Regulatory Innovation.” Regulation & Governance 5, no. 1 (2011): 1–8.
Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia. “Indonesia’s Digital Economy Reaches US$90 Billion in 2024 and Continues to Expand.” Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs, 2025.
Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonna S. Lincoln, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2018.
Edwards, Lilian, and Michael Veale. “Slave to the Algorithm? Why a ‘Right to an Explanation’ Is Probably Not the Remedy You Are Looking For.” Duke Law & Technology Review 16 (2017): 18–84.
Fahy, Lauren. “Regulator Reputation and Stakeholder Participation: A Case Study of the UK’s Regulatory Sandbox for Fintech.” European Journal of Risk Regulation 13, no. 1 (2022): 138–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2021.44.
Folke, Carl, Thomas Hahn, Per Olsson, and Jon Norberg. “Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30 (2005): 441–73. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511.
Goyal, Rishabh. “Why and How Does the Regulation of Emerging Technologies Occur? Explaining the Adoption of the EU General Data Protection Regulation Using the Multiple Streams Framework.” Regulation & Governance 16, no. 3 (2022): 588–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12387.
Greenstein, Stanley, and Mauro Zamboni. “Navigating the Legislative Dilemma: Evaluating the EU AI Act’s Approach to Regulating Emerging Technologies.” The Theory and Practice of Legislation 13, no. 3 (2025): 312–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2025.2513177.
Guston, David H. “The Anticipatory Governance of Emerging Technologies.” Journal of the Korean Vacuum Society 19, no. 6 (2010): 432–41. https://doi.org/10.5757/JKVS.2010.19.6.432.
Guston, David H. “Understanding ‘Anticipatory Governance.’” Social Studies of Science 44, no. 2 (2014): 218–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713508669.
Hasselbalch, Jacob A. “Innovation Assessment: Governing through Periods of Disruptive Technological Change.” Journal of European Public Policy 25, no. 12 (2018): 1813–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1363805.
Hildebrandt, Mireille. Law for Computer Scientists and Other Folk. Oxford University Press, 2020.
Hildebrandt, Mireille. “Law for Computer Scientists and Other Folk.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 40, no. 2 (2020): 1–20.
Jaman, Ujang Badru, Armansyah, and Thomas Sheku Marah. “Intellectual Property Governance in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Regulatory Fragmentation and the Transformation of Digital Authority.” International Journal of Law in Changing World 5, no. 1 (2026): 145–69. https://doi.org/10.54934/ijlcw.v5i1.186.
Johnson, Walter G. “Adapting Regulatory Sandboxes as Experimentalist Governance Frameworks for Public Sector Artificial Intelligence Experimentation.” Global Public Policy and Governance 6 (2026): 259–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-026-00147-x.
Johnson, Walter G. “Caught in Quicksand? Compliance and Legitimacy Challenges in Using Regulatory Sandboxes to Manage Emerging Technologies.” Regulation & Governance 17, no. 3 (2023): 709–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12487.
Kritzer, Herbert M. “The Concept of Law: What Makes Law Legal?” Journal of Law and Society 26, no. 2 (1999): 235–56.
Marsden, Christopher T. “Regulating Artificial Intelligence: Challenges and Opportunities.” European Journal of Law and Technology 9, no. 3 (2018).
Millar, Kate, Phil MacKenzie, David G. K., et al. “Integrated Assessment of Emerging Science and Technologies as Creating Learning Processes among Assessment Communities.” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 12 (2016): 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-016-0042-6.
Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia. “Artificial Intelligence Ethics and National AI Roadmap Discussed through Public Consultation, Focus Group Discussion, and Interministerial Harmonization.” JDIH Kementerian Komunikasi dan Digital, 2026.
Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia. “National Artificial Intelligence Roadmap 2026–2029 Involves More Than 30 Ministries and Government Institutions.” JDIH Kementerian Komunikasi dan Digital, 2026.
Mittelstadt, Brent, et al. “The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate.” Big Data & Society 3, no. 2 (2016): 1–21.
Mourby, Miranda. “Biomodifying the ‘Natural’: From Adaptive Regulation to Adaptive Societal Governance.” Journal of Law and the Biosciences 9, no. 1 (2022): lsac018. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsac018.
Nonet, Philippe, and Philip Selznick. Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Framework for Anticipatory Governance of Emerging Technologies. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, no. 165. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1787/0248ead5-en.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). OECD Regulatory Policy Outlook 2025. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1787/56b60e39-en.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Regulatory Impact Assessment. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020.
Patton, Michael Quinn. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2015.
Rantala, Matti. “The Logic of Regulatory Impact Assessment: From Evidence to Evidential Reasoning.” Regulation & Governance (2024). https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12542.
Republic of Indonesia. Law No. 13 of 2022 Concerning the Second Amendment to Law No. 12 of 2011 Concerning the Formation of Laws and Regulations.
Robinson, Douglas K. R., David Winickoff, and Laura Kreiling. “Technology Assessment for Emerging Technology: Meeting New Demands for Strategic Intelligence.” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, no. 146. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1787/e738fcdf-en.
Schwab, Klaus. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2016.
Schwab, Klaus. “The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What It Means, How to Respond.” World Economic Forum, January 14, 2016.
Stone, Christopher D. Where the Law Ends: The Social Control of Corporate Behavior. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.
Urueña, Sergio. “Responsibility through Anticipation? The ‘Future Talk’ and the Quest for Plausibility in the Governance of Emerging Technologies.” NanoEthics 15 (2021): 271–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-021-00408-5.
Utari, Indah Sri, Muhammad Azil Maskur, Benny Sumardiana, Diandra Preludio Ramada, and Nizamuddin Alias. “Illegal Nickel Mining in Protected Forests: Challenges in Whistleblower and Justice Collaborator Protection in Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal of Environmental Law and Sustainable Development 4, no. 2 (2025): 341–74. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijel.v4i2.38220.
Utari, Indah Sri, Diandra Preludio Ramada, Ubaidillah Kamal, Ratih Damayanti, and Nizamuddin Alias. “The Digital Sanctuary: Forging Legal and Ethical Frameworks for Interfaith Coexistence Online.” Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society 4, no. 2 (2025): 183–206. https://doi.org/10.15294/ciils.v4i2.35309.
Utari, Indah Sri, Ridwan Arifin, and Ahmad Zaharuddin Sani Ahmad Sabri. “Why Did a Five-Year-Old Toddler Become a Victim of Murder? A Criminological and Legal Perspective.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies 8, no. 2 (2023): 237–60. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v8i2.36739.
Yeung, Karen. “Algorithmic Regulation: A Critical Interrogation.” Regulation & Governance 12, no. 4 (2018): 505–23.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
63944Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rahmat Dwi Putranto, Indah Sri Utari, Ratih Damayanti, Salman Alfarisi, Umar Mubdi (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).








