Unlawful Acts in Determination of Joint Property and Donations Study of Decision Number 190/Pdt.G/2018/Pn.Kpg
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jpcl.v8i2.11893Keywords:
Grants, Joint Property, Unlawful Actions.Abstract
Analysis of Padang District Court Decision Plaintiff Name Aleta Salomi Derica Kale-Pa Number 190/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Kpg., concerning joint property grants. The legal issues raised in this analysis are: How is the analysis of the determination of joint property in Decision Number 190/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Kpg? And how can grants and control over the object of the grant be categorized as unlawful acts in Decision Number 190/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Kpg? The method used in this analysis is the IRAC Method which is a legal reasoning method with issue analysis (I), rule of law (R), argument (A), and conclusion (C). Several legal issues analyzed from the decision are to determine the object of the grant, in this case land, which is joint property, the judge's first step is to prove that the plaintiff and the landowner are husband and wife as evidenced by the Marriage Certificate. Then the next proof is related to the determination of joint property as evidenced by the land sale and purchase document. Regarding the sale and purchase process, it is also supported by the testimony of witnesses who in essence state that the witnesses know directly about the sale and purchase of the land. The grant in Decision Number 190/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Kpg has been declared as an unlawful act because the object of the grant has been proven to be joint property that was granted without the consent of the Plaintiff as the wife of the landowner. Thus, the grant is declared contrary to Article 36 paragraph 1 of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, Article 1666 of the Civil Code and Article 584 of the Civil Code. So based on the civil legal basis, the grant made by an unauthorized party must be declared null and void as an absolute nullity with all its legal consequences. Thus, according to the research, the decision of Decision Number 190/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Kpg is correct because the judge's considerations are in accordance with the concrete evidence as submitted by the parties.
References
Alifian, Muhammad, Geraldi Fauzi, and Anna Erliyana. “Kompetensi Mengadili Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Terhadap Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Oleh Badan Dan/Atau Pejabat Pemerintahan (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad).” UNES Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 4357–71. https://review-unes.com/index.php/law/article/view/1273.
Amiri, Kartika Septiani. “Perkembangan Dan Problematika Hukum Perkawinan Di Indonesia.” Al-Mujtahid: Journal of Islamic Family Law 1, no. 1 (2021): 50. https://doi.org/10.30984/jifl.v1i1.1639.
Djusfi, Apri Rotin, and Jumadi Winata. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Hibah Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.” Jurnal Ius Civile 2, no. 2 (2018): 109–21.
Fahlepy, Reza, and Et Al. “Status Peralihan Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah Berdasarkan Surat Hibah Di Bawah Tangan.” Jurnal de Jure 13, no. April (2021): 107.
Fuady, Munir. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Pendekatan Kontemporer). Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2005.
Makangiras, Aris Siswato. “PRINSIP-PRINSIP HUKUM HARTA BERSAMA DALAM PERKAWINAN BERDASARKAN UU NOMOR 1 TAHUN 1974.” Lex Privatum 2, no. 1 (2014): 116–26.
Mathar, Ahmad. “Penilaian Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Di Pengadilan Agama.” Hukum Keluarga Islam 2, no. 1 (2022): 1–19.
Nyimasmukti, Billa Ratuwibawa, Mustika Setianingrum Wijayanti, and Dewi Bella Juniarti. “An Essential Elements in Virtual Land Buying Transactions as Digital Asets in Metaverse Based Onn Indonesian Positive Law.” Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal 3, no. 1 (2023): 40–59. https://doi.org/10.15294/ipmhi.v3i1.57585.
Putri, Amanda Lauza. “Sengketa Harta Bersama Pasca Perceraian Ditinjau Dari Hukum Perdata Barat.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik (JIHHP) 4, no. 5 (2024): 1385–94.
Rafi Adji, Adris, Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan, and Daly Erni. “Pengaturan Hukum Harta Bersama Dalam Putusan Perceraian.” Jurnal Kertha Semaya 9, no. 12 (2021): 2292–2305. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2021.v09.i12.p04.
Ramadhanty, Ghifara Ayudia. “Peralihan Hak Milik Atas Barang Melalui Jual Beli Online Dengan Sistem Cash On Delivery.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 2 (2021): 361. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v10i2.8060.
Sebayang, Ahmad Jamal. “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Pengalihan Harta Bersama Dalam Perkawinan.” JURNAL HUKUM KAIDAH Media Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum Dan Masyarakat 17, no. 3 (2023): 129–40.
Seknun, Abul Hasan. “Sistem Pembuktian Perkara Perdata Di Pengadilan.” Justisia - Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 15 (2021): 1183–1202. https://www.jurnal.ummu.ac.id/index.php/justisia/article/view/1290.
Syafriani Azzahra Suzaen, Patimah, Muh, Jamal Jamil. “PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HARTA BERSAMA YANG MELEKAT PADA HARTA BAWAAN (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Agama Polewali Mandar).” Qadauna Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Keluarga Islam 4, no. 3 (2023): 673–85.
Waluyo, Bing. “Kajian Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Berdasarkan Pada Pasal 1365 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.” Cakrawala Hukum: Majalah Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijayakusuma 24, no. 1 (2022): 14–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51921/chk.v24i1.186.
Wijayanti, Winda. “Kedudukan Istri Dalam Pembagian Harta Bersama Akibat Putusnya Perkawinan Karena Perceraian Terkait Kerahasiaan Bank.” Jurnal Konstitusi 10, no. 4 (2016): 709. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1047.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
11893Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Desia Banjarani, Muslim Nugraha, Syahri Ramadhan , Sri Handayani (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Journal of Private and Commercial Law adheres to the principles of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) by providing immediate, free, and open access to all published content. All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). Under this license, users are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, and adapt the published works in any medium or format, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is included, and any changes made are clearly indicated. The use of the material is strictly limited to non-commercial purposes only.
Authors retain copyright of their work without any restriction. The journal does not transfer copyright from authors; instead, authors grant the journal the right of first publication while maintaining full ownership of their intellectual property. This ensures that authors preserve their rights while enabling wide dissemination and accessibility of their research in accordance with open access principles and DOAJ standards.
