Efficiency and Legal Certainty in Civil Procedure: Registered Letter Summons After Supreme Court Circular No. 1 of 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jpcl.v9i2.15131Keywords:
Registered Letter Summons, Service of Process, Civil Procedure, Legal Certainty, Due ProcessAbstract
This article reassesses the legal effectiveness of registered letter summons as a mode of service of process in Indonesian civil procedure following the enactment of Supreme Court Circular No. 1 of 2023. The study addresses a central question: whether the use of registered mail enhances procedural efficiency without undermining due process guarantees in private law disputes. Employing a normative juridical method combined with a conceptual and statutory approach, this research analyzes relevant procedural rules, judicial interpretations, and emerging practices in civil litigation. The findings indicate that while registered letter summons offer measurable advantages in terms of cost reduction, administrative efficiency, and expedited proceedings, their implementation raises concerns regarding proof of proper service, defendant awareness, and the risk of default judgments rendered without genuine notice. These issues directly affect the principles of audi alteram partem, legal certainty, and fairness in private law adjudication. The novelty of this study lies in its focus on the transformation of service of process mechanisms within Indonesian civil procedure through the lens of digitalization and procedural reform, specifically examining the underexplored implications of Supreme Court Circular No. 1 of 2023. The article contributes to the development of private and commercial law scholarship by offering a critical framework for evaluating alternative service methods and proposing safeguards to balance efficiency with due process. It further provides practical recommendations for courts and policymakers to strengthen verification mechanisms and ensure the reliability of registered mail as a legally sound instrument of summons.
References
Afriana, Anita, and Efa Laela Fakhirah. "A Fast Procedure as an Access to Justice in Order to Realize a Simple, Fast, and Low Cost Principle in Indonesia." Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 16, no. 1 (2016): 99-105. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2016.16.1.489
Ahyani, Hisam, Muhamad Ghofir Makturidi, and Muharir Muharir. "Administrasi Perkara Perdata Secara E-Court di Indonesia." Batulis Civil Law Review 2, no. 1 (2021): 56-65. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.521
Aidi, Zil. "Mediasi Elektronik Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Di Pengadilan Negeri Pada Era Pandemi Covid–19." Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus 5, no. 1 (2022): 133-146. https://doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v1i2.122
Amarini, Indriati, et al. "Digital Transformation: Creating an Effective and Efficient Court in Indonesia." Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 31, no. 2 (2023): 266-284. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i2.28013
Asikin, H. Zainal. Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia: Edisi Kedua. (Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2023).
Burhanuddin, Ahmad, Syeh Sarip Hadaiyatullah, and Pramudya Wisesa. "Summons for Court Proceedings Using Registered Mail in the Perspective of Civil Procedure Law." KnE Social Sciences 9, no. 3 (2024): 545-559. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i2.15013
Candra, Afrikal, et al. "Implementation of SEMA Number 01 Years 2023: Summons Notice by Registered Mail in the Religious Court." Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies 4, no. 1 (2025): 51-63. https://doi.org/10.57255/hakamain.v4i1.1354
Harahap, M. Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata: Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan. (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017).
Hidayat, Imam, et al. "Preparatory Examination in Civil Procedure Law: Strategies for Swift and Efficient Justice." Indonesia Law Reform Journal 4, no. 2 (2024): 171-198.
Irahwati, Tri. "Penerapan Administrasi Perkara Persidangan Secara Elektronik Terhadap Keabsahan Putusan Majelis Hakim." JPH: Jurnal Pembaharu Hukum 1, no. 2 (2020): 137-154. https://doi.org/10.33369/jsh.30.2.147-165
Juliansyah, Iqbal, Imam Mustofa, and Moelki Fahmi Ardliansyah. "Effectiveness of E-Court-Based Services in Resolving Civil Cases at the Sukadana District Court." Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum 21, no. 2 (2024): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.32332/istinbath.v21i02.9692
Kharlie, Ahmad Tholabi, and Achmad Cholil. "E-court and e-litigation: The new face of civil court practices in Indonesia." International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology 29, no. 2 (2020): 2206-2213.
Krishna, Om. "Structural Reforms for Overcoming Delays in Justice Delivery." Journal of Constitutional Law and Jurisprudence 1, no. 1 (2018): 32-41.
Kurniawan, M. Beni. "Implementation of Electronic Trial (E-Litigation) on The Civil Cases in Indonesia Court as a Legal Renewal of Civil Procedural Law." Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 9, no. 1 (2020): 43-70. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.1.2020.43-70
Latifiani, Dian, et al. "Can Advocates’ Legal Culture in Civil Law Enforcement Drive Reform in Indonesia’s Modern Justice System?." Journal of Law and Legal Reform 5.3 (2024): 913-942. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i3.12988
Latifiani, Dian, et al. "Reconstruction of E-Court Legal Culture in Civil Law Enforcement." Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 7, no. 2 (2022): 441-448. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i2.59993
Latifiani, Dian. "Human Attitude and Technology: Analyzing a Legal Culture on Electronic Court System in Indonesia (Case of Religious Court)." Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 6, no. 1 (2021): 157-184. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v6i1.44450
Lev, Daniel S. "Judicial authority and the struggle for an Indonesian Rechtsstaat." Law & Society Review 13, no. 1 (1978): 37-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053242
Manan HR, Abdul, et al. "Judicial Reform Through the Use of Information and Communication Technology to Realize The Principles of Simple, Fast, and Law Cost Justice." Journal Evidence of Law 3, no. 3 (2024): 531-540. https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v3i3.947
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar. (Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2007).
Mubdi, Umar, and Martina Trikusrahayu. "Indonesia’s Settlement Procedure of Small Claims: A Proposal for the Implementation of Online Dispute Resolution." Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services 6, no. 1 (2024): 53-76. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v6i1.30560
Mukharomah, Aulia. "Analisis Prosedur Pemanggilan Para Pihak yang Bersengketa." Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) 2, no. 4 (2024): 794-800.
Musa, Rahmawati Putri, Fence M. Wantu, and Mohamad Taufiq Zulfikar Sarson. "Implementation of Civil Case Settlement Before and After The Enactment of E-Court System in Electronic and Conventional Courts." Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara 1, no. 1 (2024): 17-31. https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v1i1.81
Naibaho, Rinsofat, and Indra Jaya M. Hasibuan. "Peranan Mahkamah Agung dalam Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Melalui Kekuasaan Kehakiman." Nommensen Journal of Legal Opinion 2, no. 2 (2021): 203-214. https://doi.org/10.51622/njlo.v2i02.388
Pratiwi, Sahira Jati, Steven Steven, and Adinda Destaloka Putri Permatasari. "The Application of E-Court as an Effort to Modernize the Justice Administration in Indonesia: Challenges & Problems." Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services 2, no. 1 (2020): 39-56. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v2i1.37718
Purwadi, Hari, et al. "Resolving the Judiciary Tensions between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of Indonesia." Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 9, no. 1 (2024): 317-352. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.vol9i1.4635
Putra, Dedi. "A Modern Judicial System in Indonesia: Legal Breakthrough of E-Court and e-Legal Proceeding." Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 9, no. 2 (2020): 275-297. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.2.2020.275-297
Rahmawati, Ulfah Dwi, et al. "Digital Transformation in Case Handling: A Juridical Review of Technology Utilization in the Justice System in Indonesia and Malaysia." Unnes Law Journal 10, no. 1 (2024): 43-80. https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v10i1.3668
Reda, Danya. "The Cost-and-Delay Narrative in Civil Justice Reform: Its Fallacies and Functions." Oregon Law Review 90, no. 4 (2012): 12-29.
Riyanto, Benny. "National Law Development in New Normal Era." Indonesian Law Journal 13, no. 2 (2020): 87-107. https://doi.org/10.33331/ilj.v13i2.33
Safitri, Anisa Endah Dwi, and Dian Latifiani. "The Implementation of Electronic Litigation (e-Litigation) in Efforts to Realize the The Principles of Swift, Simple, and Cost-effective Trials at Semarang District Court: Pelaksanaan Persidangan Elektronik (e-Litigation) dalam Upaya Mewujudkan Asas Persidangan Cepat, Sederhana, Biaya Ringan di Pengadilan Negeri Semarang." Annual Review of Legal Studies 1, no. 3 (2024): 439-460. https://doi.org/10.15294/arls.vol1i3.6746
Santiadi, Kukuh. "Expanding Access to Justice Through E-Court in Indonesia." Prophetic Law Review 1, no. 1 (2019): 75-89. https://doi.org/10.20885/plr.vol1.iss1.art5
Setyowati, Retno Kus. "The Conclusive Phase of Civil Case Resolution: Examining Execution and Post-Decision Challenges in Indonesian Civil Procedural Law." Unnes Law Journal 9.2 (2023): 311-332. https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v9i2.74836
Sholehudin, Miftahus, and Hartika Nurfaizah. "Legal Defect of Verstek Decision with Invalid and Proper Summons in the Context of Civil Procedure Law." Al-Bayyinah 7, no. 2 (2023): 242-260. https://doi.org/10.30863/al-bayyinah.v7i2.5464
Sibarani, William Edward. "Modern Justice: Indonesia’s Supreme Court’s Challenges to Uphold Fair Trial Principles Through Digitalization." Brawijaya Law Journal 10, no. 1 (2023): 106-121. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2023.010.01.07
Siboro, Santiana, and Sri Hadiningrum. "Tantangan Penegakan Hukum Perdata di Era Digital." Public Service and Governance Journal 5, no. 2 (2024): 52-59. https://doi.org/10.56444/psgj.v5i2.1474
Soekanto, Soerjono. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2011).
Sujatmiko, Bagus. "Electronic Public Summon in Civil Procedure in Effort to Quit the Colonial Heritage." Jurnal Al-Maqasid: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan 8, no. 1 (2022): 28-45. https://doi.org/10.24952/almaqasid.v8i1.5191
Sumadiyono, Nabilia Putri Anjani, A. P. R. P. Banjaransar, and Dian Latifiani. "Juridical Analysis of Inhibiting Factors in the Implementation of E-Litigation by the Community in the Legal Framework of the Civil Procedure Court." Melayunesia Law 5, no. 2 (2021): 231. https://doi.org/10.30652/ml.v5i2.7830
Supreme Court of Indonesia. PERMA No. 7 of 2022 on Electronic Case Administration and Trial. Available online at https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/legal-product/perma-nomor-7-tahun-2022/detail.
Supreme Court of Indonesia. SEMA No. 1 of 2023 on Registered Mail Summons. Available online at https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/legal-product/sema-nomor-1-tahun-2023/detail.
Susskind, Richard E. Tomorrow's Lawyers: An Introduction to Your Future. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023).
Susskind, Richard. Online Courts and the Future of Justice. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).
Taruffo, Michele. "Civil Procedure: Philosophy of." Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2023), pp. 467-470. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_354
Tyler, Tom R. Why People Obey the Law. (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2006).
Ulum, Hafizatul, and M. Dewa Ginting Singaulung. "Implementasi Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2022 Tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik: Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Praya." Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora 2, no. 1 (2023): 75-88. https://doi.org/10.57248/jishum.v2i1.280
Weber, Max. "Bureaucracy." In Social Theory Re-wired. (London: Routledge, 2023), pp. 271-276. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003320609-33
Yuniar, Vania Shafira, Jihan Syahida Sulistyanti, and Dian Latifiani. "The Court Role in Providing E-court System Education to Community: Post-Enactment of Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2019." UNIFIKASI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 1 (2021): 34-42. https://doi.org/10.25134/unifikasi.v8i1.3697
Yusnita, Eti, and Muhammad Toriq. "Embracing E-Court Innovation: Advancing Maslahah Mursalah in Indonesia's Religious Courts." Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari'ah Dan Masyarakat 24, no. 2 (2024): 506-523. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v24i2.24744
Yustiasari, Diah, Ni Ketut Wiratny, and Erikson Sihotang. "Measuring the Effectiveness of Summons and Notification by Registered Mail in Civil Cases at the Denpasar District Court." Edunity Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan 3, no. 8 (2024): 701-727. https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v3i8.291
Zuckerman, A. A. S. "A Reform of Civil Procedure: Rationing Procedure Rather Than Access to Justice." Journal of Law and Society 22, no. 2 (1995): 155-188. https://doi.org/10.2307/1410402
Zulaeha, Mulyani. "E-Courts in Indonesia: Exploring the Opportunities And Challenges for Justice and Advancement to Judicial Efficiency." International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences 18, no. 1 (2023): 183-194.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
15131Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Aziz Marzuki, Dian Latifiani, Ahmad Habiburrahman (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Journal of Private and Commercial Law adheres to the principles of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) by providing immediate, free, and open access to all published content. All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). Under this license, users are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, and adapt the published works in any medium or format, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is included, and any changes made are clearly indicated. The use of the material is strictly limited to non-commercial purposes only.
Authors retain copyright of their work without any restriction. The journal does not transfer copyright from authors; instead, authors grant the journal the right of first publication while maintaining full ownership of their intellectual property. This ensures that authors preserve their rights while enabling wide dissemination and accessibility of their research in accordance with open access principles and DOAJ standards.








