Analysis of Judges' Considerations in Religious Court Decision Number 1332/PDT.G/2020/PA.BTL Concerning Default in Business Contracts

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/jpcl.v9i1.23894

Keywords:

Contracts, Defaults, Judge's Considerations, Court Decisions

Abstract

This research aims to analyze and find out the legal considerations of the panel of judges in the decision of case Number 1332/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Btl) for the parties of the istishna' sale and purchase agreement which does not stipulate a delivery time limit. This research is normative legal research, which emphasizes the study of statutory norms, principles and principles of positive law, positive legal theory and basically legislative, conceptual and case approaches. In case decision Number 1332/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Btl., the panel of judges considered that the preliminary sale and purchase agreement was declared valid and binding on both parties because it had fulfilled the legal requirements of the agreement. As a legal consequence, the agreement remains valid and binding on both parties. Both parties still have the obligation to complete their achievements in good faith.

References

Asnawi, Natsir. Hukum Acara Perdata. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2016.

Aziz, Rosyid, Hanjaeli, Iwan Januar, M. Berkah Berlimpah Dengan Bisnis Properti Syariah. Bogor: Al-Azhar Fresh zone Publising, 2015.

Dimas Bayu. “Aduan Konsumen Di Indonesia Menurun Pada Tahun 2022”, DataIndonesia.Id.” dataindonseia.id, 2022.

Firmansyah, Egi Arvian, and Deru R Indika. “Kredit Pemilikan Rumah Syariah Tanpa Bank: Studi Di Jawa Barat.” Jurnal Manajemen Teori Dan Terapan | Journal of Theory and Applied Management 10, no. 3 (2017): 223. https://doi.org/10.20473/jmtt.v10i3.6541.

HA.Mukti Arto. Praktek Perkara Perdata Pada Pengadilan Agama. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2017.

———. Tatacara Pemeriksaan Ekonomi Syariah. Jakarta: Kencana, 2021.

Imron Rosyadi. Jaminan Kebendaan Berdasarkan Akad Syari’ah (Aspek Perikatan, Prosedur Pembebanan, Dan Eksekusi) Hak Tanggungan, Jaminan Fidusia. Cetakan ke. Jakarta: Jakarta : Kencana, 2017 PT Balebat Dedikasi Prima, 2017.

Khairandy, Ridwan. Hukum Kontrak Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Perbandingan. Yogyakarta: FH UII Pres, 2014.

Mihmii, Wachda. “Keuntungan Investasi Properti, Kekurangan, Serta Modal.” Global Investasi Indonesia. 2022.

Ni Nyoman Putri Satrianingsih, A.A. Ngurah Wirasila. “Peralihan Hak Milik Atas Tanah Melalui Perjanjian Jual Beli Dibawah Tangan”.” Jurnal Kertha Semaya Vol 7 no 6 (n.d.).

Petriella, Yanita. “Ini Yang Dilakukan Pengembang Untuk Meraih Penjualan Strategi Pendekatan Pasar Dapat Juga Mengundang Berkunjung Ke Galeri Pemasaran Dengan Tetap Mengikuti Protokol Kesehatan.” Bisnis.Com 31 Desember 2020 |. 2020.

Pinakunary, Fredrik J. “Pemesanan Pembelian (Purchase Order) Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia.” Fredrik J Pinakunary Law Office. Jakarta, 2020.

Purbandari. “Kepastian Dan Perlindungan Hukum Pada Pemasaran Properti Dengan Sistem.” Widya, 2012, 14.

Silvia Monty. “BPKN: Hingga Juli 2022 Terdapat 2.967 Pengaduan Konsumen Terkait Perumahan.” Prorperti Indonesia, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-08

Article ID

23894

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Sudiyana Sudiyana, Andani, D., & Faizati , F. (2025). Analysis of Judges’ Considerations in Religious Court Decision Number 1332/PDT.G/2020/PA.BTL Concerning Default in Business Contracts. Journal of Private and Commercial Law, 9(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpcl.v9i1.23894