Analysis of Grondkaart as Land Ownership Rights in the Perspective of Land Law in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jpcl.v8i1.454Keywords:
Land Rights, Community, Basic Norm, GrondkaartAbstract
A land dispute case was experienced by residents of Kebonharjo, Tanjung Mas Village, Semarang City against the Indonesian Railways Limited Company (PT KAI), where PT. KAI claims that the Kebonharjo Residents' land belongs to PT. KAI with grondkaart as a proof base. The State Treasury Law is the main basis regarding grondkaart. Decision “No. 227/Pdt.G/2016/PN. Smg,” provides information that grondkaart is still legally valid. Meanwhile Law no. 5 of 1960 and Law no. 23 of 2007, provide mutual explanations regarding orders for making certificates for land rights. This article uses a normative juridical approach, and descriptive analysis of the basis of land ownership rights in the form of grondkaart. The research results show that a state based on Pancasila really prioritizes the value of material justice which originates from the will of the people who have a strong relationship with their land, so that it can be equated with human rights. The state cannot arbitrarily control people's land rights, and the law must be in accordance with the wishes of the community, namely as a form of service by the state, not a form of confiscation by the state. Grondkaart is not stronger than a land certificate, where the form of a land certificate is considered stronger because it contains the will of the community to transfer it consciously and is not a form of confiscation. From a normative juridical point of view, Indonesian land law does not adhere to legal positivism in which Indonesian society is united by the awareness in their souls to will on the basis of Pancasila, so that their will cannot be concretized by the state in the form of any regulations, but state regulations remain as a means of order and realizing shared prosperity.
References
Arif, M. Yasin Al. “Penegakan Hukum Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 1 (2019): 169–92. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.2.1.169-192.
Atikah, Noor. “Kedudukan Surat Keterangan Tanah Sebagai Bukti Kepemilikan.” Notary Law Journal 1, no. 3 (2022): 263–89.
Brata, Ida Bagus, and Ida Bagus Nyoman Wartha. “Lahirnya Pancasila Sebagai Pemersatu Bangsa Indonesia.” Jurnal Santiaji Pendidikan 7, no. 1 (2017): 120–32.
Budiartha, I Dewa gede Atmadja & Nyoman Putu. Teori-Teori Hukum. Malang: Setara Press, 2018.
Butarbutar, Elisabeth Nurhaini. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2018.
Fitri, Winda, and Zahratul Aini. “Analisis Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Hak Milik Untuk Kepentingan Umum Di Indonesia.” Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial 8, no. 3 (2021): 277–86. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/jips.v8i3.2021.277-286.
Intansari, Virgia, and Irene Eka Sihombing. “Grondkaart Analysis of PT KAI ( Persero ) as Proof of Land Ownership.” Reformasi Hukum Trisakti 3, no. 4 (2021): 599–607. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25105/refor.v4i2.13606.
Karini, Eti. “Kedudukan Grondkaart Sebagai Bukti Penguasaan Tanah (Studi Di PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) Kantor Devisi Regional IV Tanjung Karang).” Jurnal Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan 2, no. 2 (2021): 11. https://doi.org/10.32502/khdk.v2i2.3456.
Labib Mahdi, Indri Fogar Susilowati. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Sengketa Mengenai Perkara Hak Milik Atas Tanah Pada Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1753 K/PDT/2015 (Studi Kasus Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1753 K/PDT/2015).” Novum: Jurnal Hukum 9, no. 4 (2022). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2674/novum.v0i0.42264.
Luthfi, A N. “Institutional Reform For Agrarian Reform Policy In The Era Of Joko Widodo-Jusuf Kalla’s Reign.” BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan 4, no. 2 (2018): 140–63. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31292/jb.v4i2.276.
Nasrul, O K Y. “Pemanfaatan Tanah Aset PT Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) Divisi Regional II Sumatera Barat Oleh Pihak Ketiga.” Soumatera Law Review 2, no. 1 (2019): 150–71. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.22216/soumlaw.v2i1.3554.
Nugroho, Septian Ikhwan, Diyan Isnaeni, and M. Muhibbin. “Akibat Hukum Tanah Groondkart Yang Di Kuasai PT Kereta Api Indonesia Setelah Berlakunya UUPA Nomor 5 Tahun 1960.” Dinamika, Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum 27, no. 7 (2021): 2013–15.
Pahlevi, Farida Sekti. “Kekuatan Hukum GRONDKAART Dan Problematikanya Di Indonesia.” AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 4, no. 1 (2022): 69–82. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v4i1.1522.
Priscila Putri Haneswara, Rahayu Subekti, Purwono Sungkowo Raharjo. “Penguasaan Dan Pengusahaan Tanah Oleh Warga Terhadap Aset PT Kereta Api Indonesia Di Stasiun Klaten Priscila Putri Haneswara Rahayu Subekti Purwono Sungkowo Raharjo Hukum Tanah Indonesia Diresmikan Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun.” Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik 1, no. 4 (2023). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51903/jaksa.v1i4.1394.
Rafiqi, Rafiqi, Arie Kartika, and Marsella Marsella. “Teori Hak Milik Ditinjau Dari Hak Atas Tanah Adat Melayu.” Jurnal Mercatoria 14, no. 2 (2021): 16–21. https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v14i2.5852.
Rohman, Zahrah Farhataeni, and Heru Sugiyono. “Tinjauan Yuridis Pemberian Hak Kepemilikan Atas Tanah Negara Kepada Perorangan Atau Badan Hukum.” In Procceding: Call for Paper National Conference For Law Studies: Pembangunan Hukum Menuju Era Digital Society, 978–79, 2020.
Rosana, Ellya. “Kepatuhan Hukum Sebagai Wujud Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat.” Jurnal TAPIs 10, no. 1 (2014): 1–25. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/tps.v10i1.1600.
Saifuddin, Sendy Salsabila, and Yulia Qamariyanti. “Kepastian Hukum Sertifikat Hak Milik Atas Tanah Atas Terbitnya Surat Keterangan Tanah Pada Objek Tanah Yang Sama.” Notary Law Journal 1, no. 1 (2022): 31–48. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v1i1.2.
Silvianna, Ana. “Grondkaart; Problematika Hukum Dan Penyelesaiannya (Analisis Kasus Antara PT Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) Dengan PT Pura Barutama Kudus Jawa Tengah).” Law, Development and Justice Review 3, no. 1 (2020): 70–83. https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.v3i1.7871.
Subekti, Rahayu. “Kebijakan Pemberian Ganti Kerugian Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 95, no. 2 (2016): 376–94. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v95i0.2816.
Sulistiowati Sulistiowati, Nurhasan Ismail, Taufiq El Rahman. “Status Kepemilikan Dan Pemanfaatan Tanah Grondkaart Di Stasiun Depok Baru, Lenteng Agung, Dan Tanjung Barat.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 50, no. 4 (2021): 1004. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no4.2868.
Tiffani, Michell, Sukirno Sukirno, and Irma Cahyaningtyas. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Batas Penguasaan Tanah Di Kawasan Hutan Antara Pt. Sidosari Multifarm Dengan Perhutani Kph Balapulang.” Notarius 13, no. 2 (2020): 585–94. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v13i2.31079.
Tumba, Alvian B. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Kedudukan Kepemilikan Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Sistem Pembuktian Perdata.” Lex Privatum 7, no. 7 (2018).
Ulima Fhadiah Ermahri, Betty Rubiati, Mulyani Djakaria. “Tinjauan Hukum Penguasaan Tanah Oleh Warga Di Kecamatan Tanjungsari Kabupaten Sumedang Terhadap Jalur Kereta Api Nonaktif.” Era Hukum 19, no. 2 (2021): 125–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24912/erahukum.v19i2.12182.
Utomo, Setiyo. “Penerapan Hukum Progresif Dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Agraria.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi 3, no. 2 (2020): 33–43. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v3i2.3998.
Wahyuddin, Wahyuddin, Abd. Hasan, and Johan Rahmatullah. “Menelisik Komprehensifitas Kebijakan Hukum Reforma Agraria Di Indonesia.” Journal Kompilasi Hukum 6, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.29303/jkh.v6i2.79.
Widiarto, Aan Eko. “Implikasi Hukum Pengaturan Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Bentuk Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 1 (2019): 23. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1612.
Wintoko, Dhudy Hario. “Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Milik Negara PT Kereta Api Indonesia (KAI) Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Perdata.” Lontar Merah 2, no. 1 (2019).
Yulia Chandra, Rizky, Iga Gangga Santi, and Agung Basuki Prasetyo. “Kekuatan Hukum Grondkaart Milik Pt. Kereta Api Indonesia (Studi Kasus Penguasaan Tanah Di Kelurahan Tanjung Mas Kota Semarang).” Diponegoro Law Journal 6, no. 2 (2017): 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2017.17381.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
454Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Vitria Dini Artistry, Dewi Sulistianingsih (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Journal of Private and Commercial Law adheres to the principles of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) by providing immediate, free, and open access to all published content. All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). Under this license, users are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, and adapt the published works in any medium or format, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is included, and any changes made are clearly indicated. The use of the material is strictly limited to non-commercial purposes only.
Authors retain copyright of their work without any restriction. The journal does not transfer copyright from authors; instead, authors grant the journal the right of first publication while maintaining full ownership of their intellectual property. This ensures that authors preserve their rights while enabling wide dissemination and accessibility of their research in accordance with open access principles and DOAJ standards.
