Early Childhood Football Competitions: CIPP Evaluation of the PKO Grassroots Festival IV Management

Authors

  • Bayu Pradana Bachtiar Saputra Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia Author
  • Dewangga Yudhistira Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia Author
  • Imam Syafii Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia Author
  • Afif Dwi Nugraha Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia Author
  • I Dewa Made Aryananda Wijaya Kusuma Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia Author
  • David Agus Prianto Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/jssf.v12i1.58272

Keywords:

CIPP evaluation, grassroots football, sports event management, program evaluation, mixed methods

Abstract

Background: PKO Grassroots Festival IV 2026 is a youth soccer development program, which also offers a hands-on educational experience for students in sports event administration. Objectives: This study seeks to assess the management of the PKO Grassroots Festival IV 2026 using the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) model. Method: A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was used in this investigation. Quantitative data were obtained from 34 organizing committee members and 18 coaches of participating football schools, using 16 item five-point Likert scale questionnaires. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with five key informants selected through purposive sampling. The quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, while the qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Convergence and divergence between quantitative results and qualitative themes were used to integrate the findings. Result: The committee (97.06%) and coaches (80.55%) rated the Context dimension most positively, whereas the Process dimension was rated very similar (86.11% and 84.72%, respectively). The greatest difference between stakeholders was found in the Product dimension, with positive assessments from 88.89% of the committee members and 65.28% of the coaches, representing a difference of 23.61 percentage points. Qualitative findings revealed that the festival offered educational and competitive benefits and identified areas for development, namely referee consistency, competition equipment, support facilities and participant services. Stakeholders perceived fingerprint-based verification as a management innovation intended to strengthen the participant identification process, while its quantitative usefulness in reducing age or identity fraud was not demonstrated. Conclusion: The PKO Grassroots Festival IV 2026 was positively assessed across all CIPP dimensions, however the substantial discrepancy in Product assessments points to a gap between organizational performance and participant experience. Future festival management should therefore be based on organizational and implementation strengths and improvements of participant-facing amenities, competition services and technical match management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, A., & Cahyani, F. I. (2024). Integrating sport psychology in grassroots football: enhancing performance and well-being. Jurnal Patriot, 6(3), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.24036/patriot.v6i2.1081

Almonacid-Fierro, A., de Carvalho, R. S., Sepúlveda-Vallejos, S., Méndez-Cornejo, J., & Aguilar-Valdés, M. (2024). Teaching grassroots soccer: a systematic review of literature. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports, 28(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2024.0106

Alrawili, R., AlQahtani, A. A. S., & Khan, M. K. (2024). Comprehensive survey: Biometric user authentication application, evaluation, and discussion. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 119, 109485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.109485

Antariksa, W. F., Fattah, A., & Utami, M. A. P. (2022). Evaluasi program pendidikan pesantren mahasiswa model CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product). Evaluasi: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.32478/evaluasi.v6i1.848

Ardinata, N., Daya, W. J., & Putra, A. J. (2025). Analisis Manajemen Ekstrakurikuler Futsal Dalam Meningkatkan Minat Bakat Siswa Man 1 Tanjung Jabung Barat Dengan Model Context, Input, Process, Product (Cipp). AL-MUADDIB: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan, 7(2), 320–335. https://doi.org/10.46773/muaddib.v7i2.1671

Arpizal, A., Putra, I., Sari, N., & Dwijayanti, N. S. (2025). Evaluasi program merdeka belajar dengan model CIPP dan kirkpatrick sebagai aktualiasi keberlanjutan program menjadi kampus berdampak. Jurnal Konseling Dan Pendidikan, 13(2), 438–453. https://doi.org/10.29210/1152400

Aswandi. (2024). Pengelolaan Program Pemanduan Bakat Olahraga Pada Pusat Pembinaan Dan Latihan Pelajar Provinsi Bengkulu. Manajer Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana, 18(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.33369/mapen.v18i1.34779

Aulya, A. F., Suparman, N., & Kaunain, S. N. (2022). Evaluation Analysis of Educational Programs. Journal of Quality Assurance in Islamic Education (JQAIE), 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.47945/jqaie.v2i1.605

Bisa, M. (2023). Sports Education as a Means of Building Student Character: Values and Benefits. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(2), 1581–1590. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.3889

Damayanti, R., Yandi, G., Fahrianta, R. Y., & Arifin, Z. (2022). Evaluation of Group-Based Family Income Improvement Program Using Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) Evaluation Model. International Journal of Multi Discipline Science (IJ-MDS), 5(2), 68. https://doi.org/10.26737/ij-mds.v5i2.3479

Götze, M., & Hoppe, M. W. (2021). Relative Age Effect in Elite German Soccer: Influence of Gender and Competition Level. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.587023

Hafidz, A., Rusdiawan, A., Özman, C., Ar Rasyid, M. L. S., Pavlovic, R., Orhan, B. E., Lani, A., Iswanto, A., & Susanto, N. (2024). Implementing the CIPP model for evaluating the advancement of performance in the East Java petanque sports. Retos, 61, 853–860. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v61.105989

Hamzah, N., Karim, Z. A., Fook Lee, J. L., Yaakop, N., & Akbar, A. (2025). Key factors influencing talent development in youth football: a systematic literature review. Retos, 62, 948–957. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v62.109470

Handayani, T., Hendratno, H., & Indarti, T. (2022). Pengembangan bahan ajar teks fiksi berbasis kearifan lokal dalam pembelajaran literasi membaca peserta didik kelas IV sekolah dasar. AKSARA: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.23960/aksara/v23i2.pp1-20

Haraszti, P. Z., Lente, L., Pucsok, J. M., & Lenténé Puskás, A. (2024). The Examination of Ball Skill Development in Youth Football Players. Stadium - Hungarian Journal of Sport Sciences, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.36439/shjs/2023/2/13696

Heriyanto, H. (2018). Thematic Analysis sebagai Metode Menganalisa Data untuk Penelitian Kualitatif. Anuva, 2(3), 317. https://doi.org/10.14710/anuva.2.3.317-324

Irawan, A., Sobarna, A., & Rizal, R. M. (2024). Evaluasi Program Pelatihan Cabang Olahraga (PELATCAB) Pada Komite Olahraga Kabupaten Serang Pada Pekan Olahraga Provinsi Banten Ke-6. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(7), 6672–6679. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v7i7.5249

Johnson, D. A., & Benham, R. H. (2020). What Teens Need From Sport Programs: Educational Athletics by Transformational Coaches. Strategies, 34(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2020.1841693

Kersana, B. C., Solihin, A. O., & Syamsudar, B. (2025). Evaluation of the Futsal Sport Achievement Development Program. Altius: Jurnal Ilmu Olahraga Dan Kesehatan, 14(2), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.36706/altius.v14i2.174

Minaee, S., Abdolrashidi, A., Su, H., Bennamoun, M., & Zhang, D. (2023). Biometrics recognition using deep learning: a survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(8), 8647–8695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10237-x

Moolla, Y., De Kock, A., Mabuza-Hocquet, G., Ntshangase, C. S., Nelufule, N., & Khanyile, P. (2021). Biometric Recognition of Infants using Fingerprint, Iris, and Ear Biometrics. IEEE Access, 9, 38269–38286. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3062282

Nguyen, J. J., & Condry, D. L. J. (2023). Evaluating differences in community-engaged learning and service-learning via the context, input, process, and product model. Frontiers in Education, 8(December), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1289322

Padli, Kiram, Y., Haryanto, J., Desman, M. A., Soniawan, V., & Sembiring, N. S. (2023). Coaching and Education of Sepak Takraw Sports: an Evaluation Study. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 56(1), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v56i1.50721

Pluchinotta, I., Salvia, G., & Zimmermann, N. (2022). The importance of eliciting stakeholders’ system boundary perceptions for problem structuring and decision-making. European Journal of Operational Research, 302(1), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.12.029

Purnomo, T. J., Prasetyo, W. E., Lupita, M. N., & Abdulrahman, S. (2024). Evaluation of Sports Coaching Programs in Indonesian Using the Countenance Model. Journal of Coaching and Sports Science, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.58524/002024324100

Ramdani, F. S., & Setiawan, I. (2025). Evaluasi Pembinaan Ekstrakurikuler Pencak Silat di SMA Negeri 3 Slawi, SMA Negeri 1 Bojong, dan SMK Negeri 1 Bumijawa Kabupaten Tegal. SPRINTER: Jurnal Ilmu Olahraga, 6(2), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.46838/spr.v6i2.754

Reed, M. S., & Rudman, H. (2023). Re-thinking research impact: voice, context and power at the interface of science, policy and practice. Sustainability Science, 18(2), 967–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01216-w

Riawan, I. M. O., & Citariani, N. M. (2025). Efektivitas Model Evaluasi CIPP dalam Program Pendidikan: Kajian Literatur Sistematis. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16, 108–115. https://doi.org/10.21009/jep.v16i2.58457

Sankaran, S., & Saad, N. (2022). Evaluating the Bachelor of Education Program Based on the Context, Input, Process, and Product Model. Frontiers in Education, 7(June), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.924374

Schlemmer, P., Stickdorn, M., Kristiansen, E., & Schnitzer, M. (2022). A mixed methods stakeholder satisfaction study of sports events based on the case of the 2016 international children’s games. Journal of Convention and Event Tourism, 23(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/15470148.2021.1908921

Septiano, M., & Amrulloh, A. (2025). Analysis of Sports Education and Training Centers for Students: Management System. Indonesian Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 5(4), 591–604. https://doi.org/10.52188/ijpess.v5i4.1557

Sharifi, T., Hosseini, S.-E., Mohammadpour, S., Javan-Noughabi, J., Ebrahimipour, H., & Hooshmand, E. (2021). Quality assessment of services provided by health centers in Mashhad, Iran: SERVQUAL versus HEALTHQUAL scales. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1), 397. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06405-4

Shen, S., Liu, Z., Wang, J., Fan, L., Ji, F., & Tao, J. (2021). Machine learning assisted Cameriere method for dental age estimation. BMC Oral Health, 21(1), 641. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-0199

Simamora, B. (2022). Skala Likert, Bias Penggunaan dan Jalan Keluarnya. Jurnal Manajemen, 12(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.46806/jman.v12i1.978

Simion, A., & Mangra, G. (2023). Strategic Optimization of the Management of Sports Organizations. Management & Marketing, 21(1), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.52846/mnmk.21.1.09

Supriyanto, A., Suherman, W. S., Kriswanto, E. S., Prasetyo, Y., Nasrulloh, A., Eka, D., Saputra, W., Nugroho, S. S., & Yudhistira, D. (2019). Evaluation of Woodball Achievement Coaching Management. Jorpres (Jurnal Olahraga Prestasi), 19(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.21831/jorpres.v19i1.60641

Susanto, N., Alimuddin, A., & Syafrianto, D. (2019). Manajemen pembinaan olahraga usia dini sekolah sepakbola (SSB) Gadjah Mada (GAMA) Yogyakarta. Jurnal Sporta Saintika, 4(2), 60–63. https://doi.org/10.24036/sporta.v4i2.114

Suri, S., & Hariyati, N. (2024). CIPP evaluation model in the educational evaluation: A literature study. Cahaya Pendidikan, 10(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.33373/chypend.v10i1.5950

Utomo, S. B., Atma, E. S., Dwikurnaningsih, Y., & Loekmono, J. T. L. (2023). Evaluasi Program Bimbingan Dan Konseling Berbasis Cipp. Satya Widya, 39(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.sw.2023.v39.i1.p40-50

Vebrianto, R., Thahir, M., Putriani, Z., Mahartika, I., Ilhami, A., & Diniya. (2020). Mixed Methods Research: Trends and Issues in Research Methodology. Bedelau: Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.55748/bjel.v1i2.35

Zhang, J., Chen, W., Petrovsky, N., & Walker, R. M. (2022). The Expectancy‐Disconfirmation Model and Citizen Satisfaction with Public Services: A Meta‐analysis and an Agenda for Best Practice. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13368

Downloads

Published

2026-10-31

Article ID

58272