The Effect of Clinical Supervision by Ophthalmologists on the Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy in Kapuas District

Authors

  • Rosmaryati Manalu Lambung Mangkurat University Author
  • Syamsul Arifin Doctoral Program in Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia Author
  • Dewi Indah Noviana Pratiwi Doctoral Program in Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia Author
  • Muhammad Ali Faisal Doctoral Program in Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia Author
  • Rosihan Adhani Doctoral Program in Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia Author
  • Lenie Marlinae Doctoral Program in Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia Author
  • Herawati Doctoral Program in Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia Author
  • Muhammad Bayu Sasongko Doctoral Program in Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/kemas.v21i3.34218

Keywords:

Diabetic Retinophaty, Clinical support, Ophthalmologist, Diabetes Mellitus, Kapuas

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM) and a leading cause of blindness among productive-age adults. Globally, the prevalence of DR reaches 34.6%, while in Indonesia it is 43.1%, making it the second most common diabetes complication after nephropathy. In Kapuas District, the 2022 data reported 5,390 DM patients and 56 DR cases, with a growing trend each year, particularly in areas with limited health services. This study, conducted in 2025, aimed to analyze the effect of clinical supervision by ophthalmologists on DR severity in relation to treatment duration, age, and healthcare access distance. A quasi-experimental design with a pre-test and post-test approach was applied to 52 non-proliferative DR patients divided into intervention (clinical supervision) and control groups. Results showed that clinical supervision effectively maintained mild DR conditions (p=1.000), while the non-supervised group exhibited increased severity (p=0.025). Longer treatment duration correlated with stable DR (p=0.000), age influenced severe DR (p=0.033), and healthcare distance affected moderate DR (p=0.045). Clinical supervision by ophthalmologists effectively slows DR progression, particularly among productive-age patients and those with limited access to eye care services.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

Article ID

34218

Issue

Section

Articles

Share

Similar Articles

1-10 of 32

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.