The Role of Ethnicity in Rural Development: A Study on the Distribution of Education and Employment

Authors

  • Zessy Ardinal Barlan Department of Communication Science and Community Development, Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University Author
  • Sampean Laboratory of Data Desa Presisi, IPB University Author
  • A.M Agriawan Suryaalim Laboratory of Data Desa Presisi, IPB University Author
  • Sofyan Sjaf Department of Communication Science and Community Development, Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University Author
  • Abdurrahman Harits Laboratory of Data Desa Presisi, IPB University Author
  • Rifaldi Cahyanto Laboratory of Data Desa Presisi, IPB University Author
  • Lukman Hakim Department of Communication Science and Community Development, Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University Author
  • Rajib Gandi Department of Communication Science and Community Development, Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University Author
  • Ahmad Aulia Arsyad Laboratory of Data Desa Presisi, IPB University Author
  • Rizki Budi Utami Laboratory of Data Desa Presisi, IPB University Author
  • Badar Muhammad School of Media and Communications, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v18i1.24669

Keywords:

education; employment distribution; ethnicity; rural development; social polarization

Abstract

Rural development in multi-ethnic areas requires data-driven approaches that precisely capture social inequalities. This study aims to analyze the relationship between ethnicity, educational attainment, and employment sectors in four villages in East Kalimantan, Indonesia: Kutai Lama, Sidomulyo, Sanga-Sanga Muara, and Muara Pantuan. Employing a quantitative approach using the Bayesian Contingency Table method, along with polarisation and ethnic fractionalization indices, this study utilized microdata from 13,007 individuals based on Data Desa Presisi. The findings indicated no statistically significant relationship between ethnicity and educational or employment outcomes (BF10 < 1), thus supporting the null hypothesis. Ethnicity was not significantly correlated with educational attainment or employment type. However, descriptive analysis reveals distinct patterns among ethnic groups, such as a higher concentration of informal sector employment among Bugis and Sundanese, and greater representation in the formal sector among Javanese and Banjar communities. These patterns suggest that complex social dynamics are not necessarily reflected in statistical associations. Polarisation and fractionalization indices further indicate that unmanaged ethnic diversity may exacerbate social inequalities. This study underscores the importance of inclusive microdata-based development strategies. This study contributes to the literature on ethnicity-based rural development, while opening new avenues for exploring the intersectionality of ethnicity, education, and employment in rural Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-11

Article ID

24669

Issue

Section

Articles