Legal Construction of Telesurgery in National Health Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v10i2.18349Keywords:
Legal Construction, Telesurgery, Health, Legal LiabilityAbstract
The development of health technology must be accompanied by the establishment of robust healthcare laws to safeguard both healthcare professionals and patients from potential risks and losses arising from errors in telesurgery. In light of this, three key issues are formulated in this study: namely the development of telesurgery in the legal framework, the legal construction of telesurgery and legal responsibility in the event of errors in telesurgery. This study is a normative legal analysis examining the regulatory framework governing telesurgery and the legal responsibilities arising from potential errors. A literature review serves as the primary method for collecting both primary and secondary legal sources. The research employs a legislative and conceptual legal approach, with qualitative analysis used to address the identified issues. Legal frameworks for the regulation of telesurgery must be developed at both the international level, particularly in relation to jurisdiction, and the national level, focusing on medical standardization in its implementation. The practice of telerobotic surgery must be regulated by law, derived from policy regulations, and regulated by internal guidelines from surgeons. At a minimum, several legal elements must be addressed, including jurisdiction, ethics committees within surgical organizations, inter-ministerial collaboration, the legal relationship between patients and physicians, pre-operative explanations and informed consent, legal accountability, medical confidentiality, medical team requirements, and information security management systems. Legal liability for failed surgical procedures may arise in cases of errors, whether intentional or due to negligence.
References
Ahmad, Zubair, et al. “Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Medicine, Current Applications and Future Role with Special Emphasis on Its Potential and Promise in Pathology: Present and Future Impact, Obstacles Including Costs and Acceptance among Pathologists, Practical and Philosophical Considerations. A Comprehensive Review.” Diagnostic Pathology 16, no. 1 (2021): 24.
Aimun A. B. Jamjoom et al., “Autonomous Surgical Robotic Systems and the Liability Dilemma,” Frontiers in Surgery 9 (September 16, 2022), https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1015367.
Alexander Reinisch et al. “Robotic Operations in Urgent General Surgery: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Robotic Surgery 17, no. 2 (June 21, 2022): 275–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01425-6
Alice Guerra, Francesco Parisi, and Daniel Pi. “Liability for Robots I: Legal Challenges.” Journal of Institutional Economics (November 25, 2021): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137421000825.
Amanda M. Artsen et al., “Surgeon Satisfaction and Outcomes of Tele-Proctoring for Robotic Gynecologic Surgery,” Journal of Robotic Surgery 16, no. 3 (June 16, 2022): 563–68, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01280-x.
Angelescu Valeriu. “Telesurgery and Robotic Surgery: Ethical and Legal Aspect.” Journal of Community Medicine & Health Education 5, no. 3 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0711.1000355.
Anisa Nadiyati, “Pertanggungjawaban Hukum atas Kerugian Korban Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas akibat Kelalaian Pengemudi,” Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum 4, no. 1 (2025).
Anisa Suci Anjani, “Analisis Yuridis Ingkar Janji untuk Menikahi sebagai Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata,” Lex Privatum 13, no. 1 (2024).
Anmol Mohan et al. “Telesurgery and Robotics: An Improved and Efficient Era.” Cureus, March 26, 2021. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14124.
Anna V. Silven et al., “Clarifying Responsibility: Professional Digital Health in the Doctor–Patient Relationship, Recommendations for Physicians Based on a Multi-Stakeholder Dialogue in the Netherlands,” BMC Health Services Research 22, no. 1 (December 30, 2022): 129, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07316-0.
Antaranews.com. “Indonesian Urologist Successfully Performs First Telerobotic Surgery.” Antara News, August 30, 2024. https://en.antaranews.com/news/324155/indonesian-urologist-successfully-performs-first-telerobotic-surgery.
Anthony J. Lawrenson and Graham R. Braithwaite, “Regulation or Criminalisation: What Determines Legal Standards of Safety Culture in Commercial Aviation,” Safety Science 102 (2018): 251–62.
Aria Chandra Gunawan, Dika Yudanto, and Amir Junaidi, “Tinjauan Hukum Pidana terhadap Tindakan Malpraktek dalam Bidang Kesehatan atau Medis,” UNES Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 5387–5397.
Article 8 and Article 15 of the Indonesian Code of Medical Ethics, 2012, http://mkekidi.id/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/KODEKI-Tahun-2012.pdf.
Ballantyne, Garth H. “Robotic Surgery, Telerobotic Surgery, Telepresence, and Telementoring.” Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques 16, no. 10 (2002): 1389–1402.
Barbara Barbara Seeliger and Jacques Marescaux. “Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Telesurgery: From Inception to Future Perspectives.” 秀傳醫學雜誌 22 (December 1, 2023): 454–59. https://doi.org/10.30185/SCMJ.202312_22(3).0018.
Beni Satria and Sidi Jambak, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi atas Dugaan Tindak Pidana Mempekerjakan Tenaga Medis dan Tenaga Kesehatan Tanpa Izin di Rumah Sakit,” Proceeding Masyarakat Hukum Kesehatan Indonesia 1, no. 1 (2024): 90–99.
Benjamin J. McMichael, “Malpractice,” in Laws of Medicine (Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022), 129–50, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08162-0_8.
Bernardo Rocco et al. “Insights from Telesurgery Expert Conference on Recent Clinical Experience and Current Status of Remote Surgery.” Journal of Robotic Surgery 18, no. 1 (June 4, 2024): 240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-01984-w
Bilawal, Makhdoom, et al. “Knowledge, Attitudes, and Awareness of Telesurgery and Robotic Surgery among Medical Students and Health Professionals in Karachi, Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Study.” Journal of Robotic Surgery 19, no. 1 (2025): 1–14.
Christiana Jullia Makasenggehe, “Aspek Hukum Transaksi Terapeutik Antara Tenaga Medis dengan Pasien,” Lex Privatum 12, no. 1 (2023).
D. M. Herron and M. Marohn. “A Consensus Document on Robotic Surgery.” Surgical Endoscopy 22, no. 2 (February 28, 2008): 313–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9727-5.
David Silvera-Tawil. “Robotics in Healthcare: A Survey.” SN Computer Science 5, no. 1 (January 11, 2024): 189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-02551-0.
Davorin Pichler and Dražen Tomić. “Civil Liability for Damage Caused by a Robot When Performing a Medical Procedure.” Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta Nis 60, no. 91 (2021): 211–25. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfn0-33944.
De Paola, L., et al. “Legal and Forensic Implications in Robotic Surgery.” La Clinica Terapeutica 176, no. 2 (2025).
De Paola, L., et al. “Legal and Forensic Implications in Robotic Surgery.” La Clinica Terapeutica 176, no. 2 (2025): 233–40.
Devesh Nagpure and Sheetal Asutkar, “Tele-Surgery and Remote Procedures: The Future of Global Surgical Care,” Multidisciplinary Reviews 8, no. 5 (2025): 2025147.
Ding, Yichen, et al. “Telerobotic Surgery: A Comprehensive Two-Decade Evolution and the Integration of Emerging Technologies.” International Journal of Surgery (n.d.): 10–1097.
Eduard Fosch-Villaronga and Tobias Mahler. “Cybersecurity, Safety and Robots: Strengthening the Link between Cybersecurity and Safety in the Context of Care Robots.” Computer Law & Security Review 41 (July 2021): 105528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105528.
Eduard Fosch-Villaronga et al., “The Role of Humans in Surgery Automation,” International Journal of Social Robotics 15, no. 3 (March 10, 2023): 563–80, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-022-00875-0.
Elendu, Chukwuka, et al. “The Legal and Ethical Considerations in Cross-Border Telesurgical Procedures.” Annals of Medicine and Surgery 87, no. 6 (2025): 3660–72.
Elendu, Chukwuka, et al. “The Legal and Ethical Considerations in Cross-Border Telesurgical Procedures.” Annals of Medicine and Surgery 87, no. 6 (2025): 3660–72.
Emmanuel Mendoza Navarro, Adrielly Nahomee Ramos Álvarez, and Francisca Irene Soler Anguiano, “A New Telesurgery Generation Supported by 5G Technology: Benefits and Future Trends,” Procedia Computer Science 200 (2022): 31–38, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.202.
Farid Gharagozloo et al. “History of Robotic Surgery.” In Robotic Surgery, 21–29. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53594-0_3.
Fernando Fuertes-Guiró and Eduardo Viteri Velasco. “Ethical Aspects Involving the Use of Information Technology in New Surgical Applications: Telesurgery and Surgical Telementoring.” Acta Bioethica 24, no. 2 (December 2018): 167–79. https://doi.org/10.4067/S1726-569X2018000200167
Fuertes-Guiró and Viteri Velasco, “Ethical Aspects Involving the Use of Information Technology in New Surgical Applications: Telesurgery and Surgical Telementoring.”
Giorgia Lorenzini et al., “Artificial Intelligence and the Doctor–Patient Relationship: Expanding the Paradigm of Shared Decision Making,” Bioethics 37, no. 5 (June 25, 2023): 424–29, https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13158.
Gualter de Medeiros Sousa and Arnaldo Manuel Pinto Santos. “The Viability of Telesurgery Service in the Autonomous Region of the Azores, Supported by the 5G Network.” Procedia Computer Science 219 (2023): 422–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.308.
Hakamada, Kenichi, and Masaki Mori. “The Changing Surgical Scene: From the Days of Billroth to the Upcoming Future of Artificial Intelligence and Telerobotic Surgery.” Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery 5, no. 3 (2021): 268.
Hakamada, Kenichi. “Surgical Education through Integration of Robotic Telesurgical Technology and AI.” Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery 7, no. 6 (2023): 846.
Hifajatali Sayyed, “Artificial Intelligence and Criminal Liability in India: Exploring Legal Implications and Challenges,” Cogent Social Sciences 10, no. 1 (2024): 2343195.
Husein Bani Issa, “Robotic Surgery and the Law: Defining Control and Criminal Responsibility,” Journal of Soft Computing and Data Mining 6, no. 1 (2025): 423–434.
Iulia Andras et al. “Artificial Intelligence and Robotics: A Combination That Is Changing the Operating Room.” World Journal of Urology 38, no. 10 (October 27, 2020): 2359–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-03037-6.
Jacques Marescaux et al. “Transcontinental Robot-Assisted Remote Telesurgery: Feasibility and Potential Applications.” Annals of Surgery 235, no. 4 (April 2002): 487–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200204000-00005.
Jay Kalra et al. “Enhancing the Quality and Delivery of Healthcare: A Decade Review of Autopsy Data.” (2022). https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002103.
Jeganathan, J. Ravichandran, Ravindran Jegasothy, and Woon Teen Sia. "Minimally invasive surgery: a historical and legal perspective on technological transformation." Journal of Robotic Surgery 19.1 (2025): 1-13.
Jiang, Aimin, et al. “Current Application Status and Innovative Development of Surgical Robot.” Med Research (2025).
Jianmin Li et al. “Application of Improved Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Telesurgery with 5G Technology in Urology.” European Urology 83, no. 1 (January 2023): 41–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.06.018
John Azizian et al., “Medical Professional Liability in Gastroenterology: Definitions, Trends, Risk Factors, Provider Behaviors, and Implications,” Expert Review of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (2021), https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2021.1940957.
Joko Sriwidodo and M. S. Tumanggor, “Regulation of Corporate Criminal Liability According to Law Number 1 Year 2023 on the Criminal Code,” Krtha Bhayangkara 18, no. 1 (2024): 197–214.
Judhith Vidya Dayati Panca Narayana and Miranti Verdiana, “Risiko Medik Dokter dalam Operasi Mata yang Mengakibatkan Kebutaan,” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune 3, no. 2 (July 22, 2020): 266–77, https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v3i2.3991.
Karolin, Yolanda Nindiya, and Adianto Mardijono. “Regulasi Penggunaan Teknologi Robotik Telesurgery dalam Praktik Kedokteran.”
Karolin, Yolanda Nindiya, and Adianto Mardijono. “Regulasi Penggunaan Teknologi Robotik Telesurgery dalam Praktik Kedokteran.”
Kaspar Rosager Ludvigsen and Shishir Nagaraja. “Dissecting Liabilities in Adversarial Surgical Robot Failures: A National (Danish) and EU Law Perspective.” Computer Law & Security Review 44 (April 2022): 105656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105656.
Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Kurikulum Pelatihan Pemeliharaan Alat Robotic Telesurgery bagi Elektromedia di Rumah Sakit. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Tenaga Kesehatan & Direktorat Peningkatan Mutu Tenaga Kesehatan, 2022.
Man Li Jin et al. “Telemedicine, Telementoring, and Telesurgery for Surgical Practices.” Current Problems in Surgery 58, no. 12 (December 2021): 100986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpsurg.2021.100986.
Marcio Covas Moschovas, Mischa Dohler, and Vipul Patel, “Telesurgery: Challenges, Ethical Considerations, and Opportunities in the Robotic Surgery Era,” European Urology Focus 11, no. 1 (2025): 40–42.
Maryani Farwati et al. “Analisa Pengaruh Teknologi Artificial Intelligence (AI) dalam Kehidupan Sehari-Hari.” Jursima: Jurnal Sistem Informasi & Manajemen 11, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.47024/js.v11i1.563
Masaki Mori et al. “Clinical Practice Guidelines for Telesurgery 2022.” Surgery Today 54, no. 8 (August 3, 2024): 817–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02863-5.
Meghana P. Lokhande et al., “Machine-to-Machine Communication for Device Identification and Classification in Secure Telerobotics Surgery,” Security and Communication Networks (August 27, 2021): 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5287514.
Misra, Sidharth, et al. “Telesurgery across Continents: A Scoping Review.” Journal of Robotic Surgery 19, no. 1 (2025): 1–17.
Mohan et al. “Telesurgery and Robotics: An Improved and Efficient Era.”
Mourão, Thiago Camelo, et al. “Telesurgery Applications, Current Status, and Future Perspectives in Technologies and Ethics.” In Handbook of Robotic Surgery (2025): 161–68.
Muhammad Ihsan Abdurrahman, S. H. Agustina, and Prof. M. H., “Analisis Perbedaan Prinsip Kesalahan dan Implikasinya terhadap Tanggung Jawab dalam Perbuatan Melawan Hukum: Studi Komparatif antara Hukum Indonesia dan Hukum Inggris,” Lex Patrimonium 3, no. 1 (2024): 5.
Muhammad Yusni and Bisdan Sigalingging, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Rangka untuk Deterrence Effect dan Effective Deterrence,” Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum 5, no. 2 (2024): 425–437.
N. D. Perera and R. E. Wickramarachchi. “Asia’s Robotic Revolution: Redefining Affordable Surgery and Challenging Da Vinci’s Legacy.” Sri Lanka Journal of Urology 15, no. 1 (November 22, 2024): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4038/slju.v15i1.4107.
Naeem AllahRakha, “Cybersecurity Regulations for Protection and Safeguarding Digital Assets (Data) in Today’s Worlds,” Lex Scientia Law Review 8, no. 1 (2024): 405–432.
Nakauchi, Masaya, et al. “Establishment of a New Practical Telesurgical Platform Using the Hinotori™ Surgical Robot System: A Preclinical Study.” Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery 407, no. 8 (2022): 3783–91.
Naya Puspita et al., “Patient Protection for Operations Using Telesurgery Technology,” Immortalis Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 1, no. 1 (2025): 88–97.
Nur Yuflikhati et al., “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Pidana: Studi Kasus Putusan No. 28/Pdt.G/2024/PN Tmg & 113/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Tmg,” Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora 5, no. 1 (2025): 16.
Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine. 收錄起迄年: 2007–Present, 2009.
P. Omid and F. Soren, “The Digital Double: Data Privacy, Security, and Consent in AI Implants,” Digital Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 2, no. 1 (2025): 105.
Paola Picozzi et al. “Telemedicine and Robotic Surgery: A Narrative Review to Analyze Advantages, Limitations and Future Developments.” Electronics 13, no. 1 (December 28, 2023): 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13010124.
Paolo Bailo et al., “Telemedicine Applications in the Era of COVID-19: Telesurgery Issues,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 1 (December 29, 2021): 323, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010323.
Patrick Barba et al. “Remote Telesurgery in Humans: A Systematic Review.” Surgical Endoscopy 36, no. 5 (May 4, 2022): 2771–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09074-4.
Pichler and Tomić, “Civil Liability for Damage Caused by a Robot When Performing a Medical Procedure.”
Picozzi et al., “Telemedicine and Robotic Surgery: A Narrative Review to Analyze Advantages, Limitations and Future Developments.”
Pieter Duysburgh, Shirley A. Elprama, and An Jacobs. “Exploring the Social-Technological Gap in Telesurgery.” In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 1537–48. New York, NY: ACM, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531717
R. A. Siregar. Hukum Kesehatan Jilid 1. Jakarta: Uki Press, 2020.
R. M. Perkins. “The Territorial Principle in Criminal Law.” Hastings Law Journal (1970). https://repository.uclawsf.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol22/iss5/2.
Reno Rudiman, Alireza Mirbagheri, and Valeska Siulinda Candrawinata. “Assessment of Robotic Telesurgery System among Surgeons: A Single-Center Study.” Journal of Robotic Surgery 17, no. 6 (2023): 2757–61.
Rhythm Matchiswala et al., “Blockchain-Based Network Security Analysis Framework for Telesurgery Systems in Healthcare,” Security and Privacy 8, no. 2 (2025): e70017.
Rini Apriyani et al., “Criminal Liability Arising from Medical Malpractice on Patients: A Review from the Perspective of Positive Law and Islamic Law,” Krtha Bhayangkara 18, no. 1 (2024): 85–106.
Roberto Garetto et al., “Ethical and Legal Challenges of Telemedicine Implementation in Rural Areas,” (2022): 31–60, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05049-7_3.
Robin Christmann and Dennis Klein, “Game Theory, Compliance, and Corporate Criminal Liability: Insights from a Three-Player Inspection Game,” Decision Analytics Journal 11 (2024): 100431.
Rocco, Bernardo, et al. “Insights from Telesurgery Expert Conference on Recent Clinical Experience and Current Status of Remote Surgery.” Journal of Robotic Surgery 18, no. 1 (2024): 240.
S. M. Saceanu et al., “Telesurgery and Robotic Surgery: Ethical and Legal Aspect,” Journal of Community Medicine & Health Education 5, no. 3 (2015), https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0711.1000355.
S. Punitha and K. S. Preetha, “Enhancing Reliability and Security in Cloud-Based Telesurgery Systems Leveraging Swarm-Evoked Distributed Federated Learning Framework to Mitigate Multiple Attacks,” Scientific Reports 15, no. 1 (2025): 27226.
Saad Aldousari et al., “The Era of Telesurgery: Insights from Ultra-Long-Distance Asia to Middle East Human Telesurgery Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy,” Journal of Robotic Surgery 19, no. 1 (2025): 1–11.
Santhosh Kumar Rajamani, Radha Srinivasan Iyer, and Iftekhar Ahmed. “Current State of Robotic Surgery and Telesurgery.” In Advances in Medical Technologies and Clinical Practice, edited by Thangavel Murugan, Jaisingh W., and Varalakshmi P., 194–216. IGI Global, 2024. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2901-6.ch011.
Shady Saikali et al., “Society of Robotic Surgery (SRS) Special Meeting in 2024: Insights from the Telesurgery Consensus Meeting,” Journal of Robotic Surgery 19, no. 1 (2025): 1–3.
Sigar P. Berutu et al., “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pekerja Perseroan Terbatas yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Pengerusakan Lingkungan Hidup (Studi Putusan Nomor 40/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.PKY),” UNES Law Review 7, no. 4 (2025): 2002–2013.
Sohail Iqbal et al. “SecureSurgiNET: A Framework for Ensuring Security in Telesurgery.” International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 15, no. 9 (September 5, 2019): 155014771987381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147719873811
Steve Sternberg. “Medical Errors Are Third Leading Cause of Death in the US 2016.” U.S. News and World Report, 2016.
Sumeet Kumar Reddy et al., “Telesurgery: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Directions,” Annals of Surgery 282, no. 2 (2025): 219–227.
Suryo Wahyu Raharjo, Pujiyono Suwadi, and Widodo Tresno Novianto. “An Ideal Regulatory Framework for Robotic Surgery Utilization in Indonesia.” (2024): 640–43. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-218-7_106
Syaiful Badri, Pristika Handayani, and Tri Anugrah Rizki, “Ganti Rugi terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dan Wanprestasi dalam Sistem Hukum Perdata,” Jurnal USM Law Review 7, no. 2 (2024): 974–985.
Tyler Rexhouse. “Telesurgery: An Integrated Legal-Bioethical Approach.” Albany Law Journal of Science & Technology 32AD (2021): 316–43. https://www.albanylawscitech.org/article/34728-telesurgery-an-integrated-legal-bioethical-approach.
Vipul Patel et al. “Technical and Ethical Considerations in Telesurgery.” Journal of Robotic Surgery 18, no. 1 (January 17, 2024): 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01797-3.
Vipul Patel et al., “Best Practices in Telesurgery: Framework and Recommendations from the Society of Robotic Surgery (SRS) for Safe and Effective Implementation,” Journal of Robotic Surgery 19, no. 1 (2025): 370.
Widodo Tresno Novianto, “Penafsiran Hukum dalam Menentukan Unsur-Unsur Kelalaian Malpraktek Medik (Medical Malpractice),” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 4, no. 2 (August 1, 2015), https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v4i2.8670.
Xin Xie et al., “Surgery without Distance: Will 5G-Based Robot-Assisted Telesurgery Redefine Modern Surgery?,” Translational Lung Cancer Research 14, no. 5 (2025): 1821.
Xin Xie et al., “Surgery without Distance: Will 5G-Based Robot-Assisted Telesurgery Redefine Modern Surgery?,” Translational Lung Cancer Research 14, no. 5 (2025): 1821.
Yolanda Nindiya Karolin and Adianto Mardijono. “Regulasi Penggunaan Teknologi Robotik Telesurgery dalam Praktik Kedokteran.” IBLAM Law Review 4, no. 1 (January 30, 2024): 247–56. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v4i1.247.
Zainab Yusufali Motiwala et al., “Telesurgery: Current Status and Strategies for Latency Reduction,” Journal of Robotic Surgery 19, no. 1 (2025): 153.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
18349Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 dewi bunga, Desyanti Suka Asih K.Tus, Ni Made Rai Kristina (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the view of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Authors retain the copyrights under this license, see our copyrights notice.
