Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments: Comparison Between India, Germany, Colombia, and the Relevancy with Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v8i1.1901Keywords:
Judicial Review, Constitutional Amendment, ; Basic Strutcture, Constitutional IdentityAbstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the urgency for a judicial review of the constitutionality of Indonesia's constitutional amendments. In addition, it explores, using Germany, Colombia, and India as comparative materials, the practice of judicial review regarding the constitutionality of constitutional amendments. The main writing approach used in this article, which examined the constitutional texts of Germany, Indonesia, Colombia, India, and Germany, was a comparative one. Similar provisions that are unchangeable explicitly or implicitly may be found in the constitutions of Colombia, Germany, India, and Indonesia. However, there are fundamental differences in efforts to protect, maintain and preserve these unchangeable provisions (as the fundamental structure and identity of the Constitution) in reviewing the constitutionality of constitutional amendments. This mechanism is practiced in India, Germany and Colombia but not in Indonesia. However, if studied carefully, 3 aspects show the urgency of implementing this mechanism in Indonesia: 1) historical aspects (the existence of past events regarding constitutional changes or transitions that are normatively unconstitutional; 2) philosophical and juridical aspects (the existence of Pancasila as state ideology as well as constitutional identity and the existence of Article 37 paragraph (5) which clearly states that the Form of the Republic of Indonesia cannot be changed); and 3) sociological aspects (the issue of constitutional amendments which seems to be patterned at the end of each president's term of office to extend the period of the president's term of office to three terms). These three aspects are the primary consideration and basis for implementing a mechanism for reviewing the constitutionality of constitutional amendments so that the fundamental structure and identity of the Indonesian Constitution are not damaged or eliminated by parliament through constitutional amendment activities.
References
“Acto Legislativo 3 de 2002 Congreso de La República - Gestor Normativo - Función Pública,” February 21, 2024. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=6679.
Ahmed, Kawser. “Revisiting Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments in Bangladesh: Article 7B, the Asaduzzaman Case, and the Fall of the Basic Structure Doctrine.” Israel Law Review 56, no. 2 (2023): 263–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223721000297.
Albert, Richard. “The Three Varieties of Unamendability.” In Constitutional Amendments, 139–72. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190640484.003.0005.
Albert, Richard C N - K3168 .A43 2019. Constitutional Amendments: Making, Breaking, and Changing Constitutions / Richard Albert. (Oxford, United Kingdom ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2019).
Albert, Richard, Malkhaz Nakashidze, and Tarik Olcay. “The Formalist Resistance to Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments.” UC Law Journal 70, no. 3 (2019): 639. https://repository.uclawsf.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol70/iss3/1.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Pancasila : Identitas Konstitusi Berbangsa dan Bernegara. (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2020).
Basarah, Ahmad. “Eksistensi Pancasila Sebagai Tolak Ukur Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 di Mahkamah Konstitusi: Kajian Perspektif Filsafat Hukum dan Ketatanegaraan.” Thesis. (Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro, 2016).
Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany (2023). https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_gg/.
Blackshield, A. R. “Fundamental Rights and the Institutional Viability of the Indian Supreme Court.” Journal of the Indian Law Institute 8, no. 2 (1996): 139–217.
Benítez-R., Vicente F. “Beyond Invalidation: Unorthodox Forms of Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments and Constitution-Amending Case Law in Colombia.” Revista de Investigações Constitucionais 9, no. 2 (2022): 269. https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v9i2.86742.
Bernal, C. “Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments in the Case Study of Colombia: An Analysis of the Justification and Meaning of the Constitutional Replacement Doctrine.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 11, no. 2 (2013): 339–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mot007.
“Bundesverfassungsgericht - Suche Nach Entscheidungen,” February 21, 2024. https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SiteGlobals/Forms/Suche/EN/Entscheidungensuche_Formular.html?language_=en.
C-551/2003C-551-03 Corte Constitucional de Colombia (2024). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2003/C-551-03.htm#_ftnref100.
Cajas-Sarria, Mario Alberto. “Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments in Colombia: A Political and Historical Perspective, 1955–2016.” The Theory and Practice of Legislation 5, no. 3 (2017): 245–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2017.1407397.
“Challenge to Extended Reservations in the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies - Supreme Court Observer,” January 20, 2024. https://www.scobserver.in/cases/challenge-to-extended-reservations-in-the-lok-sabha-and-state-legislative-assemblies/.
“Colombia 1991 (Rev. 2015) Constitution - Constitute,” February 21, 2024. https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Colombia_2015.
Colombian Constitutional Court Decision number C-970/2004 (n.d.).
Constitutional Court Decision Number, C-141/2010C-141-10 Corte Constitucional de Colombia § (2024). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2010/C-141-10.htm.
Curos, Peter. “Attack or Reform: Systemic Interventions in the Judiciary in Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia.” Oñati Socio-Legal Series 12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1393.
Dixon, R, and D Landau. “Transnational Constitutionalism and a Limited Doctrine of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 13, no. 3 (2015): 606–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mov039.
Dixon, Rosalind. “Transnational Constitutionalism and Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments.” University of Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1840963.
Eddyono, Luthfi Widagdo. “Quo Vadis Pancasila Sebagai Norma Konstitusi Yang Tidak Dapat Diubah.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 3 (2019): 585. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1637.
Eddyono, Luthfi Widagdo. “The Unamendable Articles of the 1945 Constitution.” Constitutional Review 2, no. 2 (2017): 252. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev225.
Garlicki, Lech, and Yaniv Roznai. “Introduction: Constitutional Unamendability in Europe.” European Journal of Law Reform 21, no. 3 (2019): 217–25. https://doi.org/10.5553/EJLR/138723702019021003001.
Gözler, Kemal. Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments: A Comparative Study. Bursa: Ekin Press, 2008. https://www.anayasa.gen.tr/jrca-text.htm.
Group, Crisis. “Imagining a Resolution of Venezuela’s Crisis,” 2020.
Halmai, Gábor. “Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: Constitutional Courts as Guardians of the Constitution?” Constellations 19, no. 2 (2012): 182–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2012.00688.x.
Hapsoro, Fakhris Lutfianto, and Ismail Ismail. “Interpretasi Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Untuk Mewujudkan The Living Constitution.” Jambura Law Review 2, no. 2 (2020): 139–60. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v2i2.5644.
Hein, Michael. “Do Constitutional Entrenchment Clauses Matter? Constitutional Review of Constitutional Amendments in Europe.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 18, no. 1 (2020): 78–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaa002.
Hidayat, Arief. "Constitutional Principles in Sate Administration and Government" Speech at the Seventeeth Congress of the Conference of European Constitutional Courts. Available online at https://www.mkri.id/public/content/berita/file/translation%20for%20pak%20Ketua.pdf
Hidayat, Arief. “Negara Hukum Berwatak Pancasila", Paper presented for Peningkatan Pemahaman Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Bagi Asosiasi Dosen Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan (ADPK) & Asosiasi Profesi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Indonesia (AP3KnI), Bogor, August 21, 2019. Available online at https://pusdik.mkri.id/materi/materi_92_Makalah%20Negara%20Hukum%20Berwatak%20Pancasila_Hakim%20Konstitusi%20Prof.%20Arief%20Hidayat.pdf
Huq, Aziz Z., and Tom Ginsburg. “How to Lose a Constitutional Democracy.” UCLA Law Review 65 (2017): 88–168. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2901776.
“I.C. Golak Nath And Ors. vs State Of Punjab And Anr. on 27 February, 1967,” February 20, 2024. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/21266288/.
India, Supreme Court of. Writ Petition (civil) 135 of 1970 (n.d.). https://main.sci.gov.in/jonew/judis/29981.pdf.
Janelidze, Elene. “Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments in Georgia, France and Germany-The Quest for Eternity.” Central European University, 2016. http://files/235/janelidze_elene.pdf.
Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru vs. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461 (n.d.).
Kostadinov, Bijana. “Constitutional Identity.” Iustinianus Primus Law Review 3, no. 1 (2012).
Lailam, Tanto. “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Federal Jerman dalam Perlindungan Hak Fundamental Warga Negara Berdasarkan Kewenangan Pengaduan Konstitusional.” Jurnal HAM 13, no. 1 (2022): 65. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2022.13.65-80.
Landau, David. “Abusive Constitutionalism.” University of California Davis Law Review 47, no. 1 (2013): 189–260. https://lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu/archives/47/1/abusive-constitutionalism.
Law Number 7 of 1950 concerning Amendments to the Temporary Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia to Become the Provisional Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (2024). http://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38102/uu-no-7-tahun-1950.
Lee, Yvonne Tew and Hoong Phun. “The Law and Politics of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments in Malaysia.” In The Law and Politics of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments in Asia, edited by Ngoc Son Rehan Abeyratne, 94. (New York: Rouletdge, 2021).
Ley 1354 de 2009 - Gestor Normativo - Función Pública (2024). https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=37303.
“Ley 796 de 2003 Congreso de La República de Colombia,” February 21, 2024. https://www.alcaldiabogota.gov.co/sisjur/normas/Norma1.jsp?i=7144.
Linares Cantillo, Alejandro, Camilo Valdivieso-León, and Santiago García-Jaramillo. Constitutionalism: Old Dilemmas, New Insights. 1st ed. (Oxford University Press, 2021).
“Lok Sabha: SC to Hear on Nov 21 Pleas Challenging Validity of Extending Reservation of Seats for SCs/STs in LS, Assemblies, ET LegalWorld,” January 30, 2024. https://legal.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/litigation/sc-to-hear-on-nov-21-pleas-challenging-validity-of-extending-reservation-of-seats-for-scs/sts-in-ls-assemblies/103817713.
Mahfud MD, Moh. Konstitusi dan Hukum dalam Kontroversi Isu. (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2009).
M. Nggilu, Novendri, Dian Ekawaty Ismail, Tri Sulistyowati, and Mohamad Rivaldi Moha. “Constitutional Crisis: Intensifying Disobedience to the Decisions of the Indonesian Constitutional Court.” Revista Chilena de Derecho 50, no. 2 (2023): 115–32. https://doi.org/10.7764/R.502.5.
Macfarlane, Emmett. “The Unconstitutionality of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments.” Manitoba Law Journal 45 (2022): 198–218. http://files/204/Macfarlane - 2022 - The Unconstitutionality of Unconstitutional Consti.pdf.
Manan, Bagir. Memahami Konstitusi: Makna dan Aktualisasi. (Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2014).
Nazriyah, Riri. “Status Hukum Ketetapan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat/Sementara Setelah Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” Jurnal Hukum 28, no. 12 (2005).
Nggilu, Novendri Momahad, Indra Perwira, Ali Abdurahman. “Constitutionality Review of Indonesian Constitutional Amendments: History and Future.” Russian Law Journal 11, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.52783/rlj.v11i2.517.
People’s Consultative Assembly Decree No. IV/MPR/1983 concerning Referendum. (n.d.). http://files/294/85uu005.pdf.
Polzin, Monika. “The Basic-Structure Doctrine and Its German and French Origins: A Tale of Migration, Integration, Invention and Forgetting.” Indian Law Review 5, no. 1 (2021): 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2020.1866882.
PTI. “Pleas Challenging Constitutional Validity of Extending Reservation to SC/ST in Lok Sabha, State Assemblies to Be Heard on November 21.” Deccan Herald, November 20, 2023. https://www.deccanherald.com/india/pleas-challenging-constitutional-validity-of-extending-reservation-to-scst-in-lok-sabha-state-assemblies-to-be-heard-on-november-21-2693546.
Ragone, Sabrina. “The ‘Basic Structure’ of the Constitution as an Enforceable Yardstick in Comparative Constitutional Adjudication.” Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria Do Direito 11, no. 3 (2020): 327–40. https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2019.113.02.
Ramirez-Cleves, Gonzalo Andres. “The Unconstitutionality of Constitutional Amendments in Colombia: The Tension Between Majoritarian Democracy and Constitutional Democracy.” In Democratizing Constitutional Law: Perspectives on Legal Theory and the Legitimacy of Constitutionalism, edited by Thomas Bustamante and Bernardo Gonçalves Fernandes, 213–29. (Law and Philosophy Library, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28371-5_10.
Ramírez, Tania. “Viability of Judicial Review of (Un)Constitutional Amendments in Mexico: Lessons From Colombia.” Cetral European University, 2021. http://files/252/ramirez_tania.pdf.
Rasyid, Usman, Novendri Mohamad Nggilu, Fence Wantu, Julisa Aprilia Kaluku, and Ahmad Ahmad. “Reformulation of the Authority of Judicial Commission: Safeguarding the Future of Indonesian Judicial Power.” Jambura Law Review 5, no. 2 (2023): 386–413. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v5i2.24239.
Richard Albert, Malkhaz Nakashidze, and Tarik Olcay. “The Formalist Resistance to Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments.” UC Law Journal 70, no. 3 (2019): 639.
Roznai, Y., and S. Yolcu. “An Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment--The Turkish Perspective: A Comment on the Turkish Constitutional Court’s Headscarf Decision.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 10, no. 1 (2012): 175–207. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mos007.
Roznai, Yaniv. “Constitutional Amendability and Unamendability in South-East Asia.” Journal of Comparative Law 14, no. 1 (2019): 188–204.
Roznai, Yaniv. “Towards a Theory of Constitutional Unamendability: On the Nature and Scope of The Constituional Amendment Powers.” Jus Politicum 18 (2017).
Roznai, Yaniv. “Unconstitutional Constitutional Amandments: A Study of The Nature and Limits of Constitutional Amandment.” The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), 2014.
Roznai, Yaniv. “Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments—The Migration and Success of a Constitutional Idea.” American Journal of Comparative Law 61, no. 3 (2013): 657–719. https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2012.0027.
Roznai, Yaniv. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: The Limits of Amendment Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Safa’at., Muchamad Ali. Sejarah Konstitusi Indonesia. (Malang: Universitas Brawijaya, 2015).
Sata, Robert, and Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski. “Caesarean Politics in Hungary and Poland.” In The (Not So) Surprising Longevity of Identity Politics, 60–79. (London: Routledge, 2022). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003271840-4.
Satrio, Abdurrachman. “The Existence of the Unamendable Provision of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia: The Role of the Constitutional Court.” Comparative Constitutional Law and Administrative Law Journal 3 (2016): 18.
Sijoria, Siddharth. “Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment: Limiting Amendment Power in India.” Thesis. (Vienna: Central European University, 2018).
Silva, Luis Alejandro, and Fernando Contreras. “La doctrina de la sustitución de la Constitución en Colombia.” Estudios constitucionales 18, no. 1 (2020): 395–434. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52002020000100395.
Silvia Suteu. Eternity Clauses in Democratic Constitutionalism. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2021).
Stender-Vorwachs, Jutta. “The Decision of the Bundesverfassungsgericht of March 3, 2004 Concerning Acoustic Surveillance of Housing Space.” German Law Journal 5, no. 11 (2004): 1337–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200013262.
Sulistyowati, Tri, Ali Ridho, and M. Imam Nasef. "Constitutional Compliance Solution to Law Testing Rulings in the Constitutional Court." Jambura Law Review 3, no. SI (2021): 117-134.
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (2002).
The Constitution of India (n.d.).
The German federal constitutional court Decision, BVerfGE 94, 12 (1990) (BvR 1452/90, 1459/90 and 2031/94) § (n.d.).
Varol, Ozan. “Stealth Authoritarianism.” Iowa Law Review 100, no. 4 (2015): 1673–1742. https://ilr.law.uiowa.edu/print/volume-100-issue-4/stealth-authoritarianism.
Wijaya, Ahmad, and Nasran Nasran. "Comparison of Judicial Review: A Critical Approach to the Model in Several Countries." Jurnal Legalitas 14, no. 2 (2021): 85-106.
Downloads
Article ID
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Novendri Nggilu, Nohamad Rivaldi Moha, Muhammad Ridho Sinaga, Adelia Rachmaniar (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the view of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Authors retain the copyrights under this license, see our copyrights notice.
