The Legal Position of Digital Forensic Experts in the Settlement of Information Technology Crime Cases

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v8i1.2952

Abstract

Digital forensic expert testimony is required by judges to resolve cases related to information technology. However, there are allegations of violations committed by certain parties on several servers such as illegal access, configuration changes, and shutdowns. This is increased by the destruction of crime scene and digital evidence.  In some cases, analyzing the data collected can be time-consuming, and practical understanding is needed by judges to avoid irrelevant questions for digital forensic experts in court. Therefore, this research aims to determine and analyze forensic digital experts in court hearings, the duties and roles of judges in resolving information and technology cases as well as the position of forensic experts in the judicial process. The doctrinal research is sourced from secondary data in the form of Electronic Information and Transaction laws, criminal procedure laws, research reports, books, and scientific journals. The results show that digital forensics expert testimony is needed to assist judges as gatekeepers in obtaining material truth. Practical digital forensic knowledge is used to increase the efficiency of case examination time by avoiding irrelevant questions. Best practices are used in the actions, procedures, handling, and analysis of electronic evidence as well as digital forensic expert testimony in judicial practice.

References

Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin, and Ahmad Siboy. “Menulis Artikel Karya Ilmiah Hukum Di Jurnal Nasional Dan Internasional Bereputasi.” Inteligensia Media, 2021.

Amarini, Indriati. Saksi Ahli Dalam Praktik Peradilan. Semarang: Saraswati Nitisara, 2019.

Amarini, Indriati, and Ratna Kartikawati. “Strengthening the Position of Expert Witness in Judicial Process.” Jurnal Media Hukum 27, no. 1 (2020): 44–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.20200141.

Beek, H M A van, J van den Bos, A Boztas, E J van Eijk, R Schramp, and M Ugen. “Digital Forensics as a Service: Stepping up the Game.” Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation 35 (2020): 301021. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2020.301021.

Booth, Brad D, Joel Watts, and Mathieu Dufour. “Lessons from Canadian Courts for All Expert Witnesses.” The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 47, no. 3 (May 16, 2019): 278–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.003838-19.

Cahyadri, Rizky Aulia. Apa Yang Harus Ditanyakan Kepada Ahli Digital Forensic? Panduan Bagi Praktisi Hukum. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2021.

Caviglione, Luca, Steffen Wendzel, and Wojciech Mazurczyk. “The Future of Digital Forensics: Challenges and the Road Ahead.” IEEE Security & Privacy 15, no. 6 (2017): 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2017.4251117.

Dmitrieva, Anna A, and Pavel S Pastukhov. “Concept of Electronic Evidence in Criminal Legal Procedure.” Journal of Digital Technologies and Law 1, no. 1 (2023): 270–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21202/jdtl.2023.11.

Du, Mingxiao. “Legal Control of Expert Witness Bias.” The International Journal of Evidence & Proof 21, no. 1–2 (December 29, 2016): 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712716674798.

Ewald, Uwe. “Digital Forensics vs. Due Process: Conflicting Standards or Complementary Approaches?” In CECC 2019: Proceedings of the Third Central European Cybersecurity Conference, 1–2, 2019. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3360664.3362697.

Fähndrich, Johannes, Wilfried Honekamp, Roman Povalej, Heiko Rittelmeier, Silvio Berner, and Dirk Labudde. “Digital Forensics and Strong AI: A Structured Literature Review.” Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation 46 (2023). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2023.301617.

Garrett, Brandon L, Brett O Gardner, Evan Murphy, and Patrick Grimes. “Judges and Forensic Science Education: A National Survey.” Forensic Science International 321 (2021): 110714. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110714.

Guo, Hong, and Junlei Hou. “Review of the Accreditation of Digital Forensics in China.” Forensic Sciences Research 3, no. 3 (July 3, 2018): 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2018.1503526.

Hamzah, Ismail, Finley Febiyanto, Kevin, and J V Moniaga. “Methods to Prevent Privacy Violations on the Internet on the Personal Level in Indonesia.” Procedia Computer Science 216 (2022): 650–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.180.

Henseler, Hans, and Sophie van Loenhout. “Educating Judges, Prosecutors and Lawyers in the Use of Digital Forensic Experts.” Digital Investigation 24 (2018): S76–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2018.01.010.

Horsman, Graeme. “Digital Evidence Strategies for Digital Forensic Science Examinations.” Science & Justice 63, no. 1 (2023): 116–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2022.11.004.

Horsman, Graeme, and Nina Sunde. “Unboxing the Digital Forensic Investigation Process.” Science & Justice 62, no. 2 (2022): 171–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2022.01.002.

Kazemi, Seyyed Sajjad, and Sajjad Heidari. “Digital Forensics and It’s Role in Promoting Criminal Prosecution.” Revista Eletrônica Em Gestão, Educação e Tecnologia Ambiental 25, no. 0 SE-ENVIRONMENTAL THECNOLOGY (August 2, 2022): e5. https://doi.org/10.5902/2236117063798.

Kebande, Victor R, Stacey Baror, Reza M Parizi, Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, and H S Venter. “Mapping Digital Forensic Application Requirement Specification to an International Standard.” Forensic Science International: Reports 2 (2020): 100137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2020.100137.

Masory, Oren. “From Litigation Consulting to Research and Education.” In 17 Th LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education, and Technology, 2019. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18687/laccei2019.1.1.250.

Muhidin, Eman Suparman, M Guntur Hamzah, and Indra Officer. “Implementation of The Ius Curia Novit Principle in Examining Case At The Constitutional Court of The Republic of Indonesia.” Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 15, no. 1 (2022): 453–65. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2022-00030.

Oppong, John Kwaku. “Evidence Confidentiality and Digital Forensic Experts.” Research Nexus in IT, Law, Cyber Security & Forensics 1, no. 1 (2022): 161–66. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.22624/aims/crp-bk3-p26.

Pandey, Abhisek Kumar, Ashutosh Kumar Tripathi, Gayatri Kapil, Virendra Singh, Mohd. Waris Khan, Alka Agrawal, Rajeev Kumar, and Raees Ahmad Khan. “Current Challenges of Digital Forensics in Cyber Security.” In M. Husain & M. Khan (Eds.), Critical Concepts, Standards, and Techniques in Cyber Forensics, 31–46. IGI Global, 2020. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1558-7.ch003.

Paul, Stephan R, Sandeep K Narang, William M McDonnell, Robin L Altman, Steven A Bondi, Jon Mark Fanaroff, Richard L Oken, et al. “Expert Witness Participation in Civil and Criminal Proceedings.” Pediatrics 139, no. 3 (March 1, 2017): e20163862. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-3862.

Pribadi, Bagus, Sri Rosdiana, and Samsul Arifin. “Digital Forensics on Facebook Messenger Application in an Android Smartphone Based on NIST SP 800-101 R1 to Reveal Digital Crime Cases.” Procedia Computer Science 216 (2023): 161–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.123.

Reedy, Paul. “Artificial Intelligence in Digital Forensics.” Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences, Third Edition 1 (2023): 170–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823677-2.00236-1.

Reedy, Paul. Strategic Leadership in Digital EvidenceWhat Executives Need to Know. Academic Press, 2020. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/C2018-0-05426-2.

Reynard, John. “Being an Expert Witness.” In Medicolegal Issues in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, edited by Swati Jha and Emma Ferriman, 51–54. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78683-4_10.

Roussev, Vassil. “Issues, Methods, and Challenges.” In Digital Forensic Science. Springer Cham, 2017. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02351-4.

Sabillon, Regner, Jordi Serra-Ruiz, Victor Cavaller, and Jeimy J Cano. “Digital Forensic Analysis of Cybercrimes: Best Practices and Methodologies.” International Journal of Information Security and Privacy 11, no. 2 (2017): 25–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/IJISP.2017040103.

Schiltenwolf, Marcus, Nickolas Beckmann, and Peter Gaidzik. “Erörterung Eines Sachverständigengutachtens Vor Gericht Und Die Haftung Des Sachverständigen [Expert Opinions in Court: Liability of the Expert].” Z Orthop Unfall 155, no. 6 (2017): 727–31. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-116798.

Selamat, Siti Rahayu, Y Robiah, Shahrin Sahib, and Nor Hafeizah Hassan. “Traceability in Digital Forensic Investigation Process.” In 2011 IEEE Conference on Open Systems (ICOS2011), 101–6, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOS.2011.6079259.

Sharevski, Filipo. “Rules of Professional Responsibility in Digital Forensics: A Comparative Analysis.” Journal of Digital Forensics, Security, and Law 10, no. 2 (2015): 39–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15394/jdfsl.2015.1201.

Sharma, Bhoopesh Kumar, Michelle Ann Joseph, Biju Jacob, and Bryan Miranda. “Emerging Trends in Digital Forensic and Cyber Security- An Overview.” In 2019 Sixth HCT Information Technology Trends (ITT), 309–13, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITT48889.2019.9075101.

Simatupang, Benget Hasudungan. “Alat Bukti Keterangan Ahli Hukum Pidana Dalam Proses Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana.” Ensiklopedia Sosial Review 2, no. 3 (2020): 304–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33559/esr.v2i3.637.

Soltani, Somayeh, and Seyed Amin Hosseini Seno. “Detecting the Software Usage on a Compromised System: A Triage Solution for Digital Forensics.” Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation 44 (2023): 301484. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2022.301484.

Suadi, Amran. Sosiologi Hukum: Penegakan, Realitas Dan Nilai Moralitas Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2018.

Todd, N V. “Expert Witnesses, Contempt of Court and Custodial Sentencing.” The Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 102, no. 1 (December 31, 2019): 34–36. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsbull.2020.34.

Downloads

Article ID

2952

Published

2024-09-22

How to Cite

The Legal Position of Digital Forensic Experts in the Settlement of Information Technology Crime Cases. (2024). Lex Scientia Law Review, 8(1), 355-384. https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v8i1.2952